Wynajem oprogramowania systemu zarządzania przepływami akredytacji i logistyki wraz z adaptacją systemu

This tender for software rental and services is generally well-structured, with a clear description and sufficient documentation. However, it lacks specific evaluation criteria and details on e-submission, impacting practicality.

The tender adheres to open procedure (2014/24/ES) and uses a proper CPV code. Deadlines are provided, and the organization is a public body. No disputes are indicated. The primary concern is the lack of a specified reveal date for submissions, which is a minor procedural gap.

The title and description clearly outline the subject of the procurement. While specific requirements are not detailed in the AI-extracted section, the presence of numerous attached documents (24 total) suggests that detailed requirements are likely contained within them. The absence of explicit evaluation criteria is a clarity concern.

Most basic information is present, including title, reference, organization, estimated value, and contract duration. A significant number of documents are attached, indicating a comprehensive set of tender materials. However, the lack of explicit details on eligibility, technical, and financial requirements in the AI-extracted section, and the absence of a reveal date, slightly reduce completeness.

The tender is an open procedure, suggesting a fair process. The estimated value is disclosed, and the CPV code is provided. The use of e-procurement is noted. There are no immediately apparent requirements tailored to specific companies. The main concern is the lack of specified evaluation criteria, which could lead to subjective assessments.

The tender is active and has a submission deadline. However, the 'Characteristics: E-Procurement' is listed, but the AI extraction notes 'No e-submission', which is contradictory and a significant concern for practical submission. The lack of a specified contract start date also impacts practicality.

Key fields such as title, reference, organization, estimated value, and deadlines are populated. The tender status is 'active', and there are no reported disputes or suspensions. Dates are logically presented, with a submission deadline preceding the opening date. The contract duration is specified.

There is no explicit mention of green procurement, social aspects, or innovation within the provided tender details. The tender is not indicated as EU funded. This suggests a lack of focus on sustainability criteria.