Roboty budowlane wraz z przygotowaniem projektu wykonawczego (Instalacja placu zabaw przy budynkach przy ul. S. Žukausko 21, 22, 23, wraz z przygotowaniem projektu wykonawczego)

This tender for construction and design services is generally well-structured with clear basic information and a reasonable estimated value. However, it lacks specific details on evaluation criteria and some practical aspects of submission.

The tender adheres to EU procurement directives and uses a standard open procedure. The CPV code is appropriate for the scope of work. While deadlines are provided, the submission deadline might be considered short given the complexity implied by the attached documents. There are no immediate flags for regulatory non-compliance based on the provided information.

The title and description clearly state the nature of the work (square installation and project preparation). Key documents like General and Special Procurement Conditions are mentioned. However, the absence of specified evaluation criteria creates ambiguity for bidders regarding how their proposals will be assessed.

Most essential information such as title, reference, organization, estimated value, and contract duration is present. A significant number of tender documents are available, including general and special conditions, and forms. However, the lack of explicit details on eligibility, technical, financial, and submission requirements within the main text, and the absence of a reveal date for opening, detract from overall completeness.

The tender is open to all bidders and uses e-procurement, promoting fairness. The estimated value is disclosed. The criteria for exclusion and qualification are likely detailed within the attached documents (e.g., ESPD form), suggesting a structured approach. Deadlines are provided, though their reasonableness is debatable.

The tender is marked as 'E-Procurement', implying electronic submission is possible. However, the 'Issues' section notes 'No e-submission', which is contradictory and needs clarification. The contract start date is not specified, and financing information is absent. The duration is provided, but the lack of a clear start date impacts practical planning.

Key fields like title, reference, organization, value, and deadlines are populated. The tender status is 'active', and there are no reported disputes or suspensions. Dates provided (submission, opening) are logical in sequence. The CPV code is present and relevant.

The tender is marked as 'EU Funded', which often implies adherence to certain standards. However, specific green procurement requirements are mentioned in one document (SPS priedas Nr. 6), but the overall focus on sustainability, social aspects, or innovation is not explicitly highlighted as a core characteristic of the tender itself.