Neutralizator zapachów PL-93 (przetarg publiczny)

This tender for odor neutralizer is generally well-structured with clear basic information and a reasonable estimated value. However, it lacks specific details on evaluation criteria and some documents are not fully accessible, impacting completeness and practicality.

The tender adheres to general legal compliance by specifying a CPV code, indicating EU funding (though later contradicted), and following an open tender procedure. The deadlines appear reasonable given the short contract duration. The reference to Directive 2014/25/ES suggests regulatory awareness.

The core requirement (odor neutralizer) and the evaluation criterion (price/costs) are stated. However, the absence of detailed evaluation criteria within the provided information reduces overall clarity on how proposals will be assessed beyond just price.

Most basic information like title, reference, organization, estimated value, and deadlines are present. However, the crucial tender documents (exclusion grounds, qualification requirements, technical specification, etc.) are listed but their content is not extracted or summarized, significantly hindering a full assessment of completeness.

The tender is an open procedure, and the estimated value is disclosed. The evaluation criterion is stated as price/costs, which is objective. There are no immediate indications of requirements tailored to specific companies. The e-procurement characteristic is noted.

The tender is active and uses e-procurement. However, the submission deadline is very short (7 days from publication), which might be impractical for suppliers to prepare and submit comprehensive bids. The contract duration is also very short (2 months). The lack of accessible content in the tender documents further impacts practicality.

Key fields such as title, reference, organization, value, and deadlines are populated. The dates provided are logical and consistent with an active tender. There are no indications of disputes or suspensions.

The tender mentions 'EU Funded' but this is contradicted in the detailed description. There are no explicit mentions of green procurement, social aspects, or innovation, which are common sustainability considerations in public tenders.