Usługi ochrony w Beaufort House i Ty Parc Newydd

This tender offers a moderate level of detail with key information present, but lacks specific criteria for evaluation and technical/financial requirements, impacting clarity and completeness. Fairness is generally good due to open procedure, but accessibility of full documentation needs improvement.

The tender uses an open procedure, which is compliant. The CPV code is correctly specified. However, the lack of a 'reveal date' is a minor procedural omission. Deadlines, while present, might be considered tight by some bidders given the scope, though not explicitly stated as unreasonable.

The description of services (Security Guarding, Alarm Response, Key Holding) is clear. However, the absence of specified evaluation criteria and detailed technical/financial requirements leaves ambiguity for bidders on how their proposals will be assessed.

Basic information such as title, reference, organization, estimated value, duration, and deadline are present. The core services are outlined. However, critical details regarding submission requirements, technical capabilities, and financial standing are missing, reducing the completeness of the tender package.

The open procedure ensures broad access. The value is disclosed, and deadlines, while present, are typical for such tenders. There are no immediately apparent requirements tailored to specific companies. However, the limited access to full document content (0 documents with content/summaries) and the absence of e-submission raise concerns regarding equal access and efficiency.

The contract start date is clearly defined. Financing information is not provided, and the lack of e-submission options makes the process less practical and modern for potential bidders.

Key fields like title, reference, organization, value, and dates are populated. There are no reported disputes. The dates provided are logical and do not indicate any inconsistencies.

There is no mention of green procurement, social aspects, or innovation within the tender description, nor is it indicated as EU funded. This limits the focus on sustainability aspects.