Opracowanie i nadzór autorski dokumentacji projektowej budowy "Budowa wielopoziomowego parkingu w celu utworzenia multimodalnego punktu połączeń transportu publicznego przy stacji kolejowej Jelgava"

This tender for construction design documentation and author supervision for a multi-story parking lot in Jelgava is generally well-structured, with clear documentation and a reasonable timeline. However, the estimated value is not disclosed, and there are concerns regarding document access and the explicit specification of evaluation criteria.

The tender adheres to standard procurement procedures, including a clear CPV code and a reasonable submission deadline. The procedure is open, and there is no indication of disputes. The contract duration is specified. The main concern is the 'Restricted document access' flag, which could impact legal compliance if it prevents full understanding of requirements.

The tender title and description are clear, outlining the specific service required. The attached documents, such as the contract draft and requirements, provide detailed information. However, the explicit 'No evaluation criteria specified' issue suggests a potential lack of clarity in how the economically most advantageous offer will be determined, despite a document referencing evaluation criteria.

Most basic information is present, including the title, reference, organization, and description. Deadlines and contract duration are specified. Five tender documents are available, which is a good sign. However, the estimated value is not disclosed, which is a significant omission for completeness.

The tender is an open procedure and uses e-procurement, promoting fairness. The criteria for evaluation are mentioned, although their explicit detail is flagged as an issue. The main concern is 'Restricted document access', which can significantly hinder fair competition if not all potential bidders can access necessary information. The value not being disclosed also impacts transparency.

The tender utilizes e-procurement, which is a positive aspect for practical submission. The contract duration is clearly stated. However, the 'No e-submission' flag is contradictory to the 'E-Procurement' characteristic and needs clarification. Financing information is not explicitly detailed, and the contract start date is not specified, only the duration.

Key fields such as title, reference, organization, and deadlines are populated. The dates provided (Reveal, Submission, Opening) are logically sequenced. There are no reported disputes or suspensions. The contract duration and tender validity period are also consistent.

The tender is marked as 'EU Funded', which often implies adherence to certain standards. However, there are no explicit mentions of green procurement, social aspects, or innovation within the provided information, leading to a moderate score in this category.