Skip to main content
Tenders

Przetarg na catering Sullivan Upper School

Otwarty
Termin składania ofert
Pozostało 95 dni
Czerwiec 30, 2026
Szczegóły umowy
Kategoria
Restricted Procedure
Numer Referencyjny
006413-2026
Wartość
£1,755,000
Lokalizacja
Northern Ireland, Wielka Brytania
Published
Marzec 20, 2026
Organizacja
Kod CPV
Harmonogram Projektu

Ogłoszenie przetargu

Styczeń 24, 2026

Termin składania pytań

Czerwiec 23, 2026

Termin składania ofert

Czerwiec 30, 2026

Data rozpoczęcia kontraktu

Czerwiec 30, 2026

Budget
£1,755,000
Duration
36 months
Lokalizacja
Northern Ireland
Type
Restricted Procedure
44
Ocena Jakości/100
Umiarkowana

Oryginalny Opis Przetargu

Usługi cateringowe dla uczniów i personelu oraz usługi hotelarskie, świadczone na miejscu. Szacowana sprzedaż 351 000 GBP rocznie.

Analiza ryzyka

Zaloguj się, aby korzystać z analizy ryzyka.

Zaloguj się

Strategia wygrywania

Zaloguj się, aby uzyskać dostęp do rekomendacji strategii wygrywania.

Zaloguj się

Konkurenci

Ulepsz plan, aby zobaczyć, które firmy prawdopodobnie złożą ofertę w tym przetargu, na podstawie historycznych danych zamówień publicznych.

Zaloguj się

Wymagania i Kwalifikacje

14 wymagań w 5 kategoriach

Składanie (3)
Obowiązkowe (1)
Zgodność (3)
Techniczne (4)
Finansowe (3)
SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS3
--Submit a request to participate, including the pre-qualifying Supplier Questionnaire, by March 2, 2026.
--If invited, submit the final tender bid by July 1, 2026 (00:00:00+01:00).
--Prepare a bid that addresses both quality (82% weighting) and price (18% weighting).
MANDATORY EXCLUSION GROUNDS1
--No specific mandatory exclusion grounds are detailed in the provided summaries.
ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS3
--Be capable of providing comprehensive on-site catering and hospitality services.
--Submit a pre-qualifying Supplier Questionnaire (SQS) as part of the request to participate.
--Adhere to the restricted procurement procedure, which involves an initial request to participate.
TECHNICAL CAPABILITY REQUIREMENTS4
--Demonstrate the ability to deliver catering services to students and staff.
--Demonstrate the ability to deliver hospitality services on-site.
--Possess the capacity to manage a contract for 5 to 7 years.
FINANCIAL REQUIREMENTS3
--Demonstrate financial capacity to manage a contract with an approximate annual sales value of £351,000.
--Demonstrate financial capacity to manage a contract with an estimated total value of £1.755 million over 5-7 years.
--Submit a competitive price, as price accounts for 18% of the evaluation criteria.

Podgląd wymagań

Zarejestruj się, aby zobaczyć pełne wymagania i analizę

Dokumenty

5 dokumentów dostępnych z podsumowaniami AI

Attachment A-10867HTM
A-10867.html

This document is a tender notice from King's College Hospital NHS Foundation Trust inviting bids for comprehensive professional interpreting and translation services across its sites, including face-to-face, telephone, video, and AI-assisted interpretation, as well as document translation.

OCDS RecordDOC
006413-2026_ocds_record.json

This OCDS Record provides structured data about Sullivan Upper School's restricted tender for on-site catering and hospitality services, with an approximate annual value of £351,000.

OCDS Release PackageDOC
006413-2026_ocds_release.json

This OCDS Release Package provides structured data about the Sullivan Upper School's restricted tender for on-site catering services, including the contracting authority's details and the tender's initiation.

Official PDF VersionPDF
006413-2026_official.pdf

This document is a tender notice from Sullivan Upper School for restricted catering services, including hospitality, with an estimated value of £1.755 million over 5-7 years, inviting requests to participate by 2 March 2026.

Tender NoticeHTM
006413-2026.html

Sullivan Upper School is seeking bids for a 5-year contract (with a possible 2-year extension) for on-site catering and hospitality services valued at an estimated £1.755 million, with submissions requiring a pre-qualifying Supplier Questionnaire by March 2, 2026, and evaluation based 82% on quality and 18% on price.

Podgląd dokumentów

Zarejestruj się, aby zobaczyć podsumowania i analizę dokumentów

44
Umiarkowana

Ocena Jakości Przetargu

This tender exhibits significant data inconsistencies and documentation errors, particularly the inclusion of an irrelevant document and conflicting contract durations, which severely impact its quality and potential for smooth execution.

Szczegółowy Wynik

Zgodność z przepisami40/100

Legal compliance is significantly hampered by the inconsistent contract duration (36 months vs 5-7 years) and the inclusion of a document pertaining to a completely different tender (King's College Hospital). While CPV codes are correct and no disputes are noted, these fundamental documentation errors pose considerable legal risks and ambiguities.

Inconsistent contract duration (36 months vs 5-7 years)
Inclusion of a document for a different tender (Document 1)
Przejrzystość65/100

The tender description and AI-extracted requirements are generally clear, and evaluation criteria are specified. However, the fundamental inconsistency regarding the contract duration (36 months in basic info vs 5-7 years in description/requirements) creates significant ambiguity for potential bidders.

Inconsistent contract duration (36 months vs 5-7 years)
Kompletność45/100

While most basic information is present, the tender is incomplete due to the missing 'Liable Person' and the critical issue of Document 1 being irrelevant to this tender. The inconsistent contract duration also points to a lack of thoroughness in defining key terms.

Missing 'Liable Person'
Inconsistent contract duration
Uczciwość60/100

The tender discloses its value and uses objective evaluation criteria (quality/price weighting). However, the absence of electronic submission limits equal access for all potential bidders. The inclusion of an irrelevant document also creates unnecessary confusion, potentially hindering fair participation.

No electronic submission option
Inclusion of an irrelevant document (Document 1) potentially causing confusion
Praktyczność40/100

Practicality is low due to the lack of electronic submission, which is a significant barrier in modern procurement. Furthermore, the contract start date being identical to the submission deadline is illogical and highly impractical, suggesting an administrative error.

No electronic submission option
Contract start date listed as submission deadline (illogical)
Spójność danych20/100

This category scores very poorly due to multiple critical inconsistencies. Document 1 is for a different entity, the contract duration is stated inconsistently (36 months vs 5-7 years), and the contract start date is illogically set as the submission deadline. Several key fields are also unpopulated.

Document 1 is for a different tender
Inconsistent contract duration (36 months vs 5-7 years)
Zrównoważony rozwój20/100

The tender does not include any explicit requirements or considerations for green procurement, social aspects, or innovation, resulting in a low score for sustainability.

No explicit mention of green procurement
No explicit mention of social aspects

Mocne strony

Clear description of required catering services
Evaluation criteria (quality/price weighting) are specified
Estimated value and CPV code are provided
Value is disclosed, not classified

Wątpliwości

Inclusion of an irrelevant document (Document 1) for a different tender
Significant inconsistency in stated contract duration (36 months vs 5-7 years)
Contract start date is illogically set as the submission deadline
Lack of electronic submission option
Absence of sustainability, social, or innovation criteria

Rekomendacje

1. Immediately rectify the tender documentation by removing irrelevant documents and ensuring all attached files pertain to this specific procurement.
2. Clarify and correct the contract duration and contract start date to ensure consistency and logical sequencing.
3. Implement an electronic submission system to enhance fairness and practicality for bidders.

Podgląd oceny AI

Zarejestruj się, aby zobaczyć pełne wymagania i analizę

Pełna analiza oceny jakości
Szczegółowy rozkład ocen cząstkowych
Mocne strony i obawy – informacje
Rekomendacje strategiczne

Karta kredytowa nie jest wymagana • Konfiguracja w 2 minuty

Nowa usługa

Chcesz, żebyśmy zajęli się tym przetargiem?

Nasi eksperci ds. zamówień publicznych przygotowują wszystko. Sprawdzone rozwiązanie — Ty przeglądasz, zatwierdzasz i składasz.

~1hTylko Twój czas
80%+80%+
$0Z góry
Zobacz pełne porównanie
Bez TaaSZ TaaS
40–80 godz.
Czas przygotowania
~1 godz.
Tylko Twój czas
15–25%
Średni wskaźnik wygranych
80%+
Wskaźnik wygranych
Ryzyko błędów
Ręczna kontrola
Ekspert QA
Kontrola zgodności
Robisz wszystko sam
Zajmujesz się wszystkim
My robimy wszystko
Kompleksowa obsługa
Wygrajmy ten przetarg!
Płacisz tylko w przypadku wygranej — tylko opłata za sukces · Zaufanie ponad 400 firm
Lub zrób to sam

Dodaj do pipeline'u