Roboty budowlane pierwszego etapu budowy - kształtowanie zbiornika stacji pomp polderu Laveru "Laveri"

This tender for construction works is generally well-structured with clear documentation, but lacks transparency in financial details and specific evaluation criteria. The process is largely compliant with e-procurement standards.

The tender appears to comply with general procurement regulations, including the use of a proper CPV code and an open procedure. Deadlines are reasonable. The primary concern is the lack of disclosed evaluation criteria, which can impact legal compliance if not clearly defined within the tender documents. No disputes are reported.

The description of the works is clear, and the requirements are documented across multiple technical specification documents. However, the absence of explicitly stated evaluation criteria within the main tender notice or summary reduces overall clarity for bidders regarding how their proposals will be assessed.

Most basic information is present, including the title, organization, and contract duration. However, the estimated value is not disclosed, which is a significant omission. While deadlines and duration are specified, the lack of financial transparency impacts completeness.

The tender utilizes e-procurement, which promotes fairness. However, the 'Issues: Restricted document access' flag suggests potential limitations in full document access for all potential bidders, which is a significant concern for fairness. The lack of disclosed evaluation criteria also raises questions about objective assessment.

The tender is active and uses e-procurement, facilitating online submission. The contract start date is not explicitly mentioned, but the duration is provided. The primary drawback is the 'Restricted document access' flag, which hinders practical preparation for potential bidders.

Key fields such as title, reference, organization, and deadlines are populated. The dates provided (Reveal Date, Submission Deadline, Opening Date) are logically ordered. There are no reported suspensions or disputes, indicating good data consistency.

The tender mentions 'EU Funded' and 'ELFLA' funding, which often implies adherence to certain EU standards. However, there are no explicit mentions of green procurement, social aspects, or innovation within the provided information, limiting the sustainability score.