Badania nad zapobieganiem bezdomności i spaniu na ulicy

This tender provides a clear research objective with essential financial and timeline details. However, it lacks specific evaluation criteria and readily accessible document content, impacting procedural transparency and bidder practicality.

The tender adheres to general regulatory requirements by specifying a CPV code and indicating an open competition procedure. Deadlines are provided, although the submission deadline appears relatively short given the contract value and scope. No disputes are reported. The procedure is described as 'Below threshold - open competition', suggesting adherence to applicable thresholds.

The title and description clearly define the research objective: to develop an evidence base and strategic action plan for homelessness and rough sleeping prevention. Key requirements are listed generically as exclusion, eligibility, technical, financial, and submission requirements, which is standard. However, the absence of specified evaluation criteria is a significant clarity issue.

Most basic information is present, including title, reference, organization, estimated value, and duration. The contract start and submission deadline are specified. However, the lack of content or summaries for the 5 tender documents severely hinders completeness, as bidders cannot fully assess the scope without accessing these documents. The 'Liable Person' field is also empty.

The tender is an open competition, indicating a fair process. The estimated value is disclosed. While specific evaluation criteria are missing, there are no explicitly tailored requirements suggesting favoritism towards specific companies. The procedure is open, and basic financial information is available.

The tender specifies a contract duration and start date. Financial information is disclosed. However, the lack of explicit mention of e-submission, coupled with the unavailability of document content, reduces practicality. Bidders must likely engage in a manual process to obtain and understand the tender requirements.

Key fields such as title, reference, organization, value, and deadlines are populated and appear logically consistent. There are no reported disputes or suspensions. The contract start date is after the submission deadline, which is logical. The 'reveal date' is noted as missing, but this does not impact internal consistency.

The tender does not explicitly mention any green procurement, social aspects, or innovation focus. It is also not indicated as EU funded. This suggests a lack of integration of sustainability principles into the procurement process.