Modernizacja boiska piłkarskiego przy ul. Bażantowej w Oławie

This tender for the modernization of a football field in Oława is generally well-structured, with clear technical requirements and available documentation. However, the absence of disclosed financial value and specific evaluation criteria slightly impacts its completeness and fairness.

The tender adheres to general procurement principles with a clear CPV code and active status. The procedure type is not specified, which is a minor omission. Deadlines are present but could be considered short given the scope, though not explicitly flagged as unreasonable. Regulatory compliance is assumed based on the provided information.

The description of the works is detailed and comprehensive, outlining all necessary components for the football field modernization. The technical requirements are clearly listed, and the reference to design documentation ensures further clarity. The main area for improvement is the lack of specified evaluation criteria.

Most basic information is present, including title, reference, organization, and a detailed description of works. Key documents such as the draft contract, offer form, and technical specifications are attached. However, the estimated value is not disclosed, and contract duration is missing, which are significant omissions.

The tender utilizes e-procurement, which promotes fairness. The requirements are technical and objective, not tailored to specific companies. The full documentation is accessible. The lack of disclosed estimated value and specific evaluation criteria could be perceived as a minor fairness concern, as it limits full transparency for potential bidders.

The tender specifies e-procurement and provides URLs for documents. However, the contract start date is not explicitly mentioned, and financing information is absent. The submission deadline is provided, but its practicality depends on the complexity of the required documentation, which is not fully detailed.

Key fields such as title, reference, organization, CPV code, and deadline are populated. There are no reported disputes or suspensions. The dates provided are logical. The only minor inconsistency is the missing procedure type code.

The tender does not explicitly mention any green procurement, social aspects, or innovation focus. While the project involves construction, there are no indicators of sustainability being a key consideration in the tender requirements.