Umowa 96 – Instalacja wentylatorów wyciągowych

This tender for the installation of extractor fans is generally well-structured, with clear objectives and a reasonable estimated value. However, it lacks detailed evaluation criteria and information on e-submission, impacting its overall practicality and fairness.

The tender appears to comply with basic legal requirements, including a clear procedure (below threshold open competition) and a specified CPV code. Deadlines are provided, though the submission deadline might be considered tight by some. No disputes are noted. The absence of a reveal date is a minor procedural oversight.

The description of the works required (installation of extractor fans and PAUs for damp/mould management) is clear. Eligibility and technical capability requirements are reasonably well-defined, focusing on the necessary experience and responsiveness. However, the lack of specified evaluation criteria leaves some ambiguity for bidders.

Most basic information is present, including title, reference, organization, estimated value, contract duration, and start date. The description is adequate. However, the lack of accessible tender documents with content or summaries is a significant gap, hindering a full assessment of completeness.

The tender is an open competition, which promotes fairness. The estimated value is disclosed, and the criteria for eligibility and technical capability are objective. The main concern is the lack of specified evaluation criteria, which could lead to subjective assessments. The absence of explicit e-submission requirements also detracts from modern fairness standards.

The tender specifies a contract duration and start date, and the estimated value is clear. However, the lack of information regarding e-submission and the unavailability of document content significantly reduce its practicality for potential bidders. Financing information is also not detailed.

Key fields such as title, reference, organization, value, and deadlines are populated. The dates provided (submission deadline, contract start) are logically sequenced. No suspensions or disputes are indicated, contributing to high data consistency.

The tender does not explicitly mention any green procurement, social aspects, or innovation focus. It is also not indicated as EU funded, suggesting a lack of emphasis on these modern procurement characteristics.