Dostawca usług namiotowych – Jordania

This tender offers a clear scope of work with a defined budget and timeline, but lacks detailed evaluation criteria and sustainability considerations.

The tender appears compliant with standard procurement procedures for below-threshold open competitions. The CPV code is appropriate, and there are no immediate indications of disputes. The deadlines are set, although the submission deadline might be considered tight given the contract start date.

The description of services required (supply, delivery, installation, dismantling of tents) is generally clear. However, the absence of specified evaluation criteria makes it difficult for bidders to fully understand how their proposals will be assessed, impacting clarity. The eligibility requirements are basic but could be more detailed.

Most essential information such as title, reference, organization, estimated value, contract duration, and start date are provided. The CPV code is also present. However, the critical issue of missing document content or summaries significantly impacts the completeness for potential bidders wishing to review the full tender package.

The tender is open competition, and the value is disclosed, which promotes fairness. The criteria for eligibility and technical capability, while basic, are not tailored to specific companies. The lack of detailed evaluation criteria might unintentionally disadvantage some bidders, but the overall structure is fair.

The tender specifies a contract start date and duration. However, the absence of explicit mention of e-submission and the lack of accessible document content create practical hurdles for bidders. The financing information is implicitly linked to the estimated value.

Key fields such as title, reference, organization, value, and dates are consistently populated and appear logical. There are no indications of suspension or disputes, and the dates provided for submission, contract start, and duration are coherent.

There is no mention of green procurement, social aspects, innovation, or EU funding in the tender. This lack of focus on sustainability criteria limits its score in this category.