Tenders

Zaproszenie do składania ofert - Ochrona obiektu Brooklands House, Cambridge (UID 58)

Otwarty
Termin składania ofert
Pozostało 7 dni
Marzec 10, 2026
Szczegóły umowy
Kategoria
Inne
Numer Referencyjny
012261-2026
Wartość
£48,000
Lokalizacja
Gloucestershire, Wiltshire and Bristol/Bath area, Wielka Brytania
Published
Luty 24, 2026
Organizacja
Kod CPV
Harmonogram Projektu

Ogłoszenie przetargu

Luty 11, 2026

Termin składania pytań

Marzec 03, 2026

Termin składania ofert

Marzec 10, 2026

Data rozpoczęcia kontraktu

Marzec 31, 2026

Analityka zamawiającegoPRO
🔒
Odblokuj analitykę zamawiającego
Zobacz wzorce wydatków, preferowane procedury i więcej.
Uaktualnij do wersji profesjonalnej →
Budget
£48,000
Duration
36 months
Lokalizacja
Gloucestershire, Wiltshire and Bristol/Bath area
Type
Inne
72
Ocena Jakości/100
Dobra

Oryginalny Opis Przetargu

Usługa ochrony wymagana przez Historic England w jej biurze w Cambridge, Brooklands House. Podsumowując, HE wymaga od Wykonawcy świadczenia usługi ochrony obejmującej kontrolę kluczy (BS 7984), zamykanie i otwieranie budynków oraz reagowanie na wezwania związane z aktywacją alarmu.

Analiza ryzyka

Zaloguj się, aby korzystać z analizy ryzyka.

Zaloguj się

Strategia wygrywania

Zaloguj się, aby uzyskać dostęp do rekomendacji strategii wygrywania.

Zaloguj się

Konkurenci

Ulepsz plan, aby zobaczyć, które firmy prawdopodobnie złożą ofertę w tym przetargu, na podstawie historycznych danych zamówień publicznych.

Zaloguj się

Wymagania i Kwalifikacje

15 wymagań w 5 kategoriach

Składanie (4)
Obowiązkowe (1)
Zgodność (3)
Techniczne (5)
Finansowe (2)
SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS4
--Submit the tender through Historic England's In-tend e-tendering portal.
--Submit all required tender documents by the deadline: 2026-03-10T09:30:00+00:00.
--Provide information for the quality evaluation (70% weighting).
MANDATORY EXCLUSION GROUNDS1
--No specific mandatory exclusion grounds are mentioned in the provided summaries.
ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS3
--Register on Historic England's In-tend e-tendering portal.
--Express interest in the tender via the In-tend portal.
--Submit tender documents via the In-tend portal.
TECHNICAL CAPABILITY REQUIREMENTS5
--Provide security services at Historic England's Cambridge office, Brooklands House.
--Deliver key control services in accordance with BS 7984.
--Perform locking and unlocking of buildings.
FINANCIAL REQUIREMENTS2
--Submit a price proposal, as price accounts for 30% of the evaluation criteria.
--Be capable of delivering services for an estimated contract value of 48000 EUR (or £40,000).

Podgląd wymagań

Zarejestruj się, aby zobaczyć pełne wymagania i analizę

Dokumenty

5 dokumentów dostępnych z podsumowaniami AI

Lot L-1HTM
L-1.html

This document provides instructions on how to register and use Historic England's In-tend e-tendering portal to access, express interest in, and submit tender documents.

OCDS RecordDOC
012261-2026_ocds_record.json

This OCDS record provides structured data about Historic England's open tender for security services at its Cambridge office, encompassing key control, building access, and alarm response.

OCDS Release PackageDOC
012261-2026_ocds_release.json

Historic England requires a security service for its Cambridge office, including key control (BS 7984), building locking/unlocking, and alarm response.

Official PDF VersionPDF
012261-2026_official.pdf

Historic England seeks a security service for its Cambridge office, Brooklands House, including key control (BS 7984), locking/unlocking, and alarm response, with an estimated value of £40,000 and a 70% quality / 30% price evaluation.

Tender NoticeHTM
012261-2026.html

Historic England requires a security service for its Cambridge office, Brooklands House, encompassing key control (BS 7984), building locking/unlocking, and alarm response, with evaluation based on 70% quality and 30% price.

Podgląd dokumentów

Zarejestruj się, aby zobaczyć podsumowania i analizę dokumentów

72
Dobra

Ocena Jakości Przetargu

This tender documentation is generally clear and practical, but its fairness and completeness are impacted by the lack of detailed quality evaluation criteria. Sustainability aspects are entirely absent.

Szczegółowy Wynik

Zgodność z przepisami75/100

The procedure type and CPV codes are clearly defined, and there are no disputes. The absence of specific mandatory exclusion grounds in the summaries is a minor oversight, but the overall legal framework appears sound for a below-threshold open competition.

No specific mandatory exclusion grounds are mentioned in the provided summaries.
Przejrzystość80/100

The service description and technical requirements are clear. The evaluation criteria weighting (70% quality, 30% price) is stated, but the detailed criteria for the 70% quality component are missing, which reduces clarity for bidders on how to best demonstrate their capabilities.

Detailed breakdown of the 70% quality evaluation criteria is not provided in the summaries.
Kompletność70/100

Basic information, deadlines, value, and duration are present, and documents are available. However, the primary gap is the lack of a detailed breakdown for the 70% quality evaluation criteria, which is crucial for a comprehensive tender.

Detailed breakdown of the 70% quality evaluation criteria is not provided in the summaries.
Uczciwość65/100

The value is disclosed, e-procurement is supported, and requirements do not appear tailored. However, the absence of detailed, objective criteria for the 70% quality component significantly impacts objectivity and transparency, potentially leading to subjective evaluation.

Lack of detailed, objective criteria for the 70% quality evaluation component.
Praktyczność85/100

Electronic submission via a dedicated portal is supported, and the contract start date and duration are clearly specified, making the process practical for potential bidders.

Direct public URL for tender documents not explicitly provided in the basic information (though accessible via portal).
Spójność danych70/100

While some fields like 'Liable Person', 'Type Code', and 'Procedure Code' are empty, the dates are logical. A notable inconsistency exists between the automated check's claim of 'No evaluation criteria specified' and the content summaries explicitly stating '70% quality and 30% price'.

Empty fields for 'Liable Person', 'Type Code', 'Procedure Code'.
Contradiction between automated check ('No evaluation criteria specified') and content summaries ('70% quality and 30% price').
Zrównoważony rozwój30/100

The tender does not explicitly mention any green procurement, social aspects, or innovation focus, indicating a missed opportunity to integrate broader sustainability goals.

No explicit mention of green procurement, social aspects, or innovation focus.

Mocne strony

Clear description of required services.
Transparent disclosure of estimated value and contract duration.
Electronic submission via a dedicated portal is supported.
Evaluation criteria weighting (70% quality, 30% price) is specified.
CPV codes are correctly assigned.

Wątpliwości

Lack of detailed, objective criteria for the 70% quality evaluation.
Absence of specific mandatory exclusion grounds in the provided summaries.
No explicit mention of green procurement, social aspects, or innovation focus.
Some basic fields (e.g., Liable Person, Type Code, Procedure Code) are empty.
The automated check results contradict the tender content regarding evaluation criteria.

Rekomendacje

1. Provide a comprehensive breakdown of the 70% quality evaluation criteria to enhance objectivity and transparency.
2. Ensure all mandatory legal requirements, including specific exclusion grounds, are clearly detailed in the tender documents.
3. Consider incorporating sustainability, social, or innovation clauses where applicable, even for standard services.

Podgląd oceny AI

Zarejestruj się, aby zobaczyć pełne wymagania i analizę

Pełna analiza oceny jakości
Szczegółowy rozkład ocen cząstkowych
Mocne strony i obawy – informacje
Rekomendacje strategiczne

Karta kredytowa nie jest wymagana • Konfiguracja w 2 minuty

Dodaj do pipeline'u