Tenders

Wymiana / naprawa dachu

Otwarty
Termin składania ofert
Pozostało 10 dni
Marzec 13, 2026
Szczegóły umowy
Kategoria
Inne
Numer Referencyjny
010354-2026
Wartość
£2,160,000
Lokalizacja
Gloucestershire, Wiltshire and Bristol/Bath area, Wielka Brytania
Published
Luty 24, 2026
Kod CPV
Harmonogram Projektu

Ogłoszenie przetargu

Luty 05, 2026

Termin składania pytań

Marzec 06, 2026

Termin składania ofert

Marzec 13, 2026

Data rozpoczęcia kontraktu

Maj 28, 2026

Analityka zamawiającegoPRO
🔒
Odblokuj analitykę zamawiającego
Zobacz wzorce wydatków, preferowane procedury i więcej.
Uaktualnij do wersji profesjonalnej →
Budget
£2,160,000
Duration
5 months
Lokalizacja
Gloucestershire, Wiltshire and Bristol/Bath area
Type
Inne
71
Ocena Jakości/100
Dobra

Oryginalny Opis Przetargu

Powołanie Głównego Wykonawcy do przeprowadzenia wymaganych prac związanych z wymianą i naprawą dachu w centrum handlowym Kings Chase.

Analiza ryzyka

Zaloguj się, aby korzystać z analizy ryzyka.

Zaloguj się

Strategia wygrywania

Zaloguj się, aby uzyskać dostęp do rekomendacji strategii wygrywania.

Zaloguj się

Konkurenci

Ulepsz plan, aby zobaczyć, które firmy prawdopodobnie złożą ofertę w tym przetargu, na podstawie historycznych danych zamówień publicznych.

Zaloguj się

Wymagania i Kwalifikacje

14 wymagań w 5 kategoriach

Składanie (4)
Obowiązkowe (1)
Zgodność (2)
Techniczne (5)
Finansowe (2)
SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS4
--Submit the tender proposal by the deadline of 2026-03-13T14:00:00+00:00.
--Address and provide detailed information regarding Quality aspects of the proposed work.
--Provide a comprehensive price proposal.
MANDATORY EXCLUSION GROUNDS1
--No specific mandatory exclusion grounds are detailed in the provided tender information summaries.
ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS2
--Must be a Main Contractor capable of undertaking roof replacement and repair work.
--Must be eligible to operate as a contractor within the United Kingdom and specifically for South Gloucestershire Council.
TECHNICAL CAPABILITY REQUIREMENTS5
--Demonstrate proven experience and technical capability in undertaking roof replacement and repair projects.
--Demonstrate the ability to act as a Main Contractor for construction projects of similar scope and value.
--Possess the necessary resources and expertise to complete the project within the specified 5-month duration.
FINANCIAL REQUIREMENTS2
--Possess the financial capacity to undertake a project with an estimated value of £1.8M / 2.16M EUR.
--Submit a competitive price proposal, which will be evaluated as 40% of the award criteria.

Podgląd wymagań

Zarejestruj się, aby zobaczyć pełne wymagania i analizę

Dokumenty

4 dokumentów dostępnych z podsumowaniami AI

OCDS RecordDOC
010354-2026_ocds_record.json

South Gloucestershire Council is seeking a main contractor for roof replacement and repair work at Kings Chase Shopping Centre.

OCDS Release PackageDOC
010354-2026_ocds_release.json

This OCDS Release Package provides structured, machine-readable data detailing the tender for roof replacement and repair work at Kings Chase Shopping Centre, including information about the contracting authority, South Gloucestershire Council.

Official PDF VersionPDF
010354-2026_official.pdf

South Gloucestershire Council seeks a Main Contractor for roof replacement and repair work at Kings Chase Shopping Centre, with an estimated value of £1.8M, requiring submissions by March 13, 2026, and evaluated on quality (50%), price (40%), and social value (10%).

Tender NoticeHTM
010354-2026.html

This notice announces an open tender by South Gloucestershire Council for a main contractor to undertake roof replacement and repair work at Kings Chase Shopping Centre, with an estimated value of £1.8M, a submission deadline of 13 March 2026, and award criteria focusing on Quality (50%), Price (40%), and Social Value (10%).

Podgląd dokumentów

Zarejestruj się, aby zobaczyć podsumowania i analizę dokumentów

71
Dobra

Ocena Jakości Przetargu

This tender for roof replacement and repairs is generally clear and transparent, with well-defined requirements and evaluation criteria including social value. However, the absence of electronic submission and detailed mandatory exclusion grounds in the summary are significant drawbacks impacting fairness and practicality.

Szczegółowy Wynik

Zgodność z przepisami75/100

The procedure type and CPV codes are clearly defined. The 37-day submission period is generally reasonable for a below-threshold tender, assuming documents were available from the start. However, the 'missing reveal date' prevents full assessment of the preparation time, and the lack of detailed mandatory exclusion grounds in the provided summaries is a notable legal compliance gap.

Missing reveal date for full assessment of preparation time
No specific mandatory exclusion grounds detailed in summaries
Przejrzystość80/100

The project description is clear, and the AI-extracted requirements are well-documented and understandable. Evaluation criteria (Quality 50%, Price 40%, Social Value 10%) are explicitly stated, contradicting an automated flag. Performance conditions are implied but could be more detailed.

Performance conditions could be more explicitly detailed beyond duration and quality weighting
Kompletność70/100

Most basic information, including title, reference, organization, value, duration, and deadlines, is provided. Requirements and evaluation criteria are defined. However, the liable person and specific procedure codes are missing, and the summary lacks detailed mandatory exclusion grounds.

Liable person not specified
Specific procedure codes are missing
Uczciwość65/100

The tender value is disclosed, and requirements appear generic, not tailored to a specific company. Evaluation criteria are objective and transparently weighted. However, the flagged absence of electronic submission ('No e-submission') is a significant barrier to equal access and reduces overall fairness.

No electronic submission supported, hindering equal access
Praktyczność60/100

The contract start date and duration are clearly specified. However, the lack of electronic submission is a major practical deficiency in modern procurement, potentially increasing administrative burden for bidders and the contracting authority.

No electronic submission supported
Spójność danych90/100

Key fields are largely populated, and there are no reported disputes or suspensions. Dates are logical and consistent. Minor gaps like the missing liable person do not create inconsistencies within the provided data.

Zrównoważony rozwój50/100

The tender explicitly includes social value objectives, weighted at 10% of the award criteria, which is a positive aspect. However, there is no mention of green procurement or innovation focus, limiting its overall sustainability score.

No explicit green procurement criteria
No innovation focus

Mocne strony

Clear project description and well-defined requirements
Transparently disclosed estimated value and evaluation criteria
Inclusion of social value objectives in award criteria
Availability of OCDS data for transparency
Requirements appear generic and not tailored

Wątpliwości

Absence of electronic submission capability
Lack of detailed mandatory exclusion grounds in summaries
Missing reveal date for full assessment of preparation time
No explicit green procurement or innovation focus
Missing liable person and specific procedure codes

Rekomendacje

1. Implement electronic submission for improved fairness and practicality.
2. Ensure all mandatory exclusion grounds are clearly detailed in the tender documentation.
3. Provide a clear publication/reveal date to ensure transparency regarding the bidding period.

Podgląd oceny AI

Zarejestruj się, aby zobaczyć pełne wymagania i analizę

Pełna analiza oceny jakości
Szczegółowy rozkład ocen cząstkowych
Mocne strony i obawy – informacje
Rekomendacje strategiczne

Karta kredytowa nie jest wymagana • Konfiguracja w 2 minuty

Dodaj do pipeline'u