Tenders

NUN - Odrodzenie Parku Riversley w Nuneaton - Prace Głównego Wykonawcy przy Rewitalizacji Parku

Otwarty
Termin składania ofert
Pozostało 3 dni
Marzec 06, 2026
Szczegóły umowy
Kategoria
Inne
Numer Referencyjny
012391-2026
Wartość
£1,440,000
Lokalizacja
Herefordshire, Worcestershire and Warwickshire, Wielka Brytania
Published
Luty 24, 2026
Kod CPV
Harmonogram Projektu

Ogłoszenie przetargu

Luty 11, 2026

Termin składania pytań

Luty 27, 2026

Termin składania ofert

Marzec 06, 2026

Data rozpoczęcia kontraktu

Czerwiec 08, 2026

Budget
£1,440,000
Duration
6 months
Lokalizacja
Herefordshire, Worcestershire and Warwickshire
Type
Inne
61
Ocena Jakości/100
Dobra

Oryginalny Opis Przetargu

Projekt ma na celu zwiększenie dostępności i użyteczności parku dla rowerzystów i pieszych poprzez budowę nowej ścieżki rowerowej od Ogrodów George'a Elliota (na północy) przez Muzeum i Galerię Sztuki Nuneaton (na południu; znane również jako Plac Melly). Projekt został podzielony na następujące fazy/sekcje: 1. Ogrody George'a Elliota. 2. Przejście podziemne. 3. Plac Melly. Tradycyjna, jednoetapowa umowa JCT D&B 2024. Dodatkowe informacje dotyczące programu, specyfikacji, projektów i informacji z badań znajdują się w pakiecie dokumentacji przetargowej.

Analiza ryzyka

Zaloguj się, aby korzystać z analizy ryzyka.

Zaloguj się

Strategia wygrywania

Zaloguj się, aby uzyskać dostęp do rekomendacji strategii wygrywania.

Zaloguj się

Konkurenci

Ulepsz plan, aby zobaczyć, które firmy prawdopodobnie złożą ofertę w tym przetargu, na podstawie historycznych danych zamówień publicznych.

Zaloguj się

Wymagania i Kwalifikacje

14 wymagań w 5 kategoriach

Składanie (4)
Obowiązkowe (1)
Zgodność (2)
Techniczne (5)
Finansowe (2)
SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS4
--Submit the bid by the deadline: March 6, 2026, 12:00:00 UTC.
--The submission must include a price proposal, which will account for 60% of the evaluation.
--The submission must include a quality proposal, which will account for 40% of the evaluation.
MANDATORY EXCLUSION GROUNDS1
--No specific mandatory exclusion grounds are detailed in the provided tender notice information. Bidders should refer to the full tender documentation for these.
ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS2
--Bidders must be capable of acting as a Main Contractor.
--Bidders must be willing to contract under a Traditional single stage JCT Design & Build Contract 2024.
TECHNICAL CAPABILITY REQUIREMENTS5
--Demonstrate capability in building demolition, wrecking work, and earthmoving work (CPV 45110000).
--Demonstrate capability in constructing new cycle paths.
--Demonstrate capability to manage and deliver a project split into phases (George Elliot Gardens, The Underpass, Melly Square).
FINANCIAL REQUIREMENTS2
--Demonstrate financial capacity to undertake a project with an estimated value of £1.2 million (or 1.44 million EUR).
--Ability to provide a competitive price proposal for evaluation.

Podgląd wymagań

Zarejestruj się, aby zobaczyć pełne wymagania i analizę

Dokumenty

4 dokumentów dostępnych z podsumowaniami AI

OCDS RecordDOC
012391-2026_ocds_record.json

This OCDS record provides structured data about Nuneaton and Bedworth Borough Council's open tender for the construction of a new cycle path to enhance accessibility in the park, detailing project phases and contract type.

OCDS Release PackageDOC
012391-2026_ocds_release.json

This OCDS Release Package provides structured data detailing the Nuneaton and Bedworth Borough Council's open tender for constructing a new cycle path to enhance accessibility in the park, outlining project phases and the contracting authority.

Official PDF VersionPDF
012391-2026_official.pdf

This tender notice from Nuneaton and Bedworth Borough Council invites main contractors for the Riversley Park Revival project, involving the construction of a new cycle path with an estimated value of £1.2M, and details an extended submission deadline of March 6, 2026, with evaluation based on 60% price and 40% quality.

Tender NoticeHTM
012391-2026.html

This is a tender notice for the main contractor work on the Riversley Park Revival project in Nuneaton, involving the construction of a new cycle path, and it includes the submission deadline.

Podgląd dokumentów

Zarejestruj się, aby zobaczyć podsumowania i analizę dokumentów

61
Dobra

Ocena Jakości Przetargu

This tender presents a clear project scope but suffers from significant gaps in detailed evaluation criteria and a lack of modern e-submission capabilities, impacting fairness and clarity. Its sustainability integration is minimal.

Szczegółowy Wynik

Zgodność z przepisami75/100

The tender generally appears compliant with national regulations for a below-threshold open competition. The procedure type and CPV codes are defined, and deadlines are reasonable. However, specific codes for the procedure type are missing, and mandatory exclusion grounds are not detailed in the provided summary, requiring reference to full documentation.

Missing specific codes for procedure type
Mandatory exclusion grounds not detailed in summary
Przejrzystość60/100

The project description and general requirements are clear and unambiguous. However, a significant clarity issue exists as the detailed evaluation criteria for the 40% quality component are not specified in the provided information, making it difficult for bidders to formulate a targeted quality proposal.

Missing detailed quality evaluation criteria
Kompletność65/100

Most essential information, such as title, organization, value, duration, and location, is present. Nevertheless, the tender lacks detailed quality evaluation criteria, specific mandatory exclusion grounds in the summary, and some administrative codes for the procedure type. The 'Liable Person' field is also empty.

Missing detailed quality evaluation criteria
Missing specific mandatory exclusion grounds in summary
Uczciwość50/100

While the value is disclosed and requirements seem generic, two major issues impact fairness. Firstly, the absence of e-submission creates a barrier to equal access for potential bidders. Secondly, the lack of detailed quality evaluation criteria reduces transparency and objectivity in the assessment process.

No electronic submission support
Lack of detailed quality evaluation criteria
Praktyczność55/100

The contract start date and duration are clearly specified. However, the absence of electronic submission support is a significant practical drawback in modern procurement, potentially increasing administrative burden for both bidders and the contracting authority.

No electronic submission support
Spójność danych70/100

Key dates are logical and there are no reported disputes or suspensions. However, some fields like 'Liable Person' are empty, and specific codes for the procedure type are missing. There is also an internal contradiction in the provided data regarding the presence of evaluation criteria, which has been interpreted as missing *detailed* criteria.

Empty 'Liable Person' field
Missing specific codes for procedure type
Zrównoważony rozwój30/100

The tender does not explicitly integrate green procurement, social clauses (beyond the inherent project outcome), or innovation-focused criteria into its requirements. This indicates a low emphasis on broader sustainability objectives within the procurement process itself.

No explicit green procurement criteria
No explicit social criteria

Mocne strony

Clear project description and scope
Value and key timelines (duration, start date) are specified
Appropriate CPV code assigned
Open competition procedure for transparency
OCDS data provided for structured information

Wątpliwości

Lack of detailed quality evaluation criteria
No electronic submission support
Absence of explicit sustainability, social, or innovation criteria
Missing specific mandatory exclusion grounds in the summary
Some administrative fields (e.g., Liable Person, procedure codes) are incomplete

Rekomendacje

1. Provide comprehensive and detailed quality evaluation criteria to ensure transparency and objectivity.
2. Implement an e-submission platform to facilitate equal access and streamline the bidding process.
3. Integrate explicit sustainability, social value, and innovation criteria into the tender requirements where applicable.

Podgląd oceny AI

Zarejestruj się, aby zobaczyć pełne wymagania i analizę

Pełna analiza oceny jakości
Szczegółowy rozkład ocen cząstkowych
Mocne strony i obawy – informacje
Rekomendacje strategiczne

Karta kredytowa nie jest wymagana • Konfiguracja w 2 minuty

Dodaj do pipeline'u