Strukturalne i wizualne oceny zasobów oświetlenia ulicznego Rady Miasta York zgodnie z GN22

This tender for street lighting asset assessments offers a clear scope and reasonable financial details. However, it lacks explicit evaluation criteria and details on document content, impacting completeness and clarity.

The tender appears to comply with general procurement regulations, including a specified CPV code and a clear procedure type. The deadline appears reasonable for a below-threshold open competition. No disputes are reported.

The description of services is clear, and the subject matter is well-defined. Mandatory requirements are listed, but the absence of specified evaluation criteria reduces overall clarity on how submissions will be judged.

Basic information such as title, reference, organization, value, and duration is provided. However, the lack of accessible document content and missing evaluation criteria means key details for a complete understanding are absent.

The tender is an open competition, suggesting a fair process. The value is disclosed, and criteria, although not specified, are implied to be objective. The procedure is below threshold, which typically offers good accessibility.

While the contract start date and duration are provided, the absence of e-submission details and information on financing limits the practicality. Access to document content is also a significant hurdle.

Key fields like title, reference, organization, value, and dates are populated. There are no reported disputes or suspensions, and the dates provided are logical and consistent.

The tender does not explicitly mention green procurement, social aspects, innovation, or EU funding, which are common sustainability considerations in modern tenders.