UWTSD2526/235. Ramy dla profesjonalnych konsultacji w zakresie rozwoju kapitału

This tender for a Capital Development Professional Consultancy Framework is generally well-structured with clear lot divisions and a disclosed value. However, it lacks specific evaluation criteria and details on green or social aspects, impacting its completeness and sustainability scores.

The tender follows an open procedure and references the Procurement Act 2023, indicating a commitment to regulatory compliance. The CPV code is provided. While deadlines are present, the submission deadline might be considered short given the complexity of a framework agreement. No disputes are noted. The absence of a reveal date is a minor procedural oversight.

The description of the framework, its purpose, and the seven distinct lots is clear. The requirements for tenderers to indicate their chosen lots and possess the necessary capacity and capability are well-defined. The instruction to adhere to a specified format for responses enhances clarity.

Most basic information is present, including the estimated value, contract duration, and start date. The division into seven lots is detailed. However, crucial information such as specific evaluation criteria and mandatory exclusion grounds is missing, which affects the overall completeness of the tender documentation.

The tender is conducted via an e-procurement portal (Sell2Wales), ensuring broad access. The estimated value is disclosed, and the division into lots allows for specialized bidding. The criteria for capacity and capability are objective. The lack of specific evaluation criteria is a minor concern for fairness, but the overall process appears equitable.

The tender is conducted via an e-procurement portal, which is a positive aspect. However, the provided text does not explicitly confirm e-submission functionality or provide a direct URL to the documents beyond mentioning the Sell2Wales portal. Financing information is not detailed, and while the contract start date is present, the lack of explicit e-submission confirmation limits this score.

Key fields such as title, reference, organization, estimated value, contract duration, and start date are populated logically. The CPV code and NUTS code are present. No disputes or suspensions are noted, contributing to high data consistency.

The tender documentation does not explicitly mention any requirements or considerations for green procurement, social aspects, or innovation. It is also not indicated as EU funded. This lack of focus on sustainability aspects results in a moderate score.