„Remont nawierzchni drogi ul. Piastowskiej wraz z siecią wodociągową oraz systemem odwodnienia w Świeradowie-Zdroju- II Etap”

This tender for road renovation is generally well-structured with a good number of supporting documents. However, the lack of disclosed estimated value and explicit evaluation criteria are notable drawbacks.

The tender appears to comply with general procurement regulations, including the use of a proper CPV code and the indication of e-procurement. The procedure type is not specified, which is a minor omission. No disputes are indicated. Deadlines are present but could be considered tight given the scope.

The title and description clearly define the scope of works. A significant number of documents are provided, suggesting detailed requirements are available within them. However, explicit evaluation criteria are missing, which impacts overall clarity.

Most basic information is present, including the title, reference, organization, and deadline. The estimated value is not disclosed, which is a significant omission. The duration of the contract is also not specified. A large number of documents are attached, which aids completeness.

The tender utilizes e-procurement, which promotes fairness. The value is not disclosed, which can be a concern for bidders assessing the opportunity. No specific requirements appear tailored to individual companies, indicating a good level of fairness. Objective criteria are not explicitly stated.

The tender specifies e-procurement, which is positive. However, the contract start date is not provided, and financing information is absent. The duration is also missing, impacting practical planning for bidders.

Key fields such as title, reference, organization, and deadline are populated. There are no indications of suspension or disputes. The dates provided are logical, with the submission deadline well after the tender date.

There is no explicit mention of green procurement, social aspects, or innovation. The tender does not indicate if it is EU-funded. This suggests a lack of focus on sustainability criteria.