Budowa i rozbudowa drogi gminnej Dylewo - Łodziska

This tender for municipal road construction is generally well-documented with clear technical requirements and available project documentation. However, it lacks disclosed financial value and specific evaluation criteria, impacting completeness and fairness.

The tender adheres to standard procurement practices with a clear CPV code and location. Deadlines are present, though the submission deadline might be considered short given the scope. No disputes or suspensions are noted. Regulatory compliance is assumed based on the available information.

The description of the road construction works is detailed and specific, outlining the required elements such as carriageway width, length, accesses, shoulders, ditches, culverts, signage, and utility coordination. The reference to technical specifications, bills of quantities, and design documentation further enhances clarity.

Most basic information is present, including title, reference, organization, type, CPV, and duration. However, the estimated financial value is not disclosed, which is a significant omission. While many documents are attached, the absence of explicit financial details impacts overall completeness.

The tender utilizes e-procurement, which promotes accessibility. The technical requirements are specific to the project scope and do not appear to be tailored to any particular company. The main concern regarding fairness is the lack of disclosed evaluation criteria, which can make it difficult for bidders to understand how their submissions will be assessed.

The tender specifies e-procurement, which is a positive aspect for submission practicality. The contract duration is clearly stated. However, the absence of a 'reveal date' for the contract award and the lack of explicit financing information could pose minor challenges for bidders in their planning.

Key fields such as title, reference, organization, CPV, and deadlines are populated. The dates are logical, and there are no indications of suspension or disputes. The contract duration is consistent with the scope of works.

The tender does not explicitly mention any green procurement, social aspects, or innovation requirements. It is also not indicated as EU-funded. This suggests a lack of focus on sustainability criteria.