Skip to main content
Tenders

Remont bloków QRSV 5, 6 i 7

Zamknięty
Termin składania ofert
Pozostało 0 dni
Marzec 27, 2026
Szczegóły umowy
Kategoria
Open Procedure
Numer Referencyjny
013903-2026
Wartość
£300,000
Lokalizacja
Hampshire and Isle of Wight, Wielka Brytania
Published
Marzec 19, 2026
Kod CPV
Harmonogram Projektu

Ogłoszenie przetargu

Luty 16, 2026

Termin składania pytań

Marzec 20, 2026

Termin składania ofert

Marzec 27, 2026

Data rozpoczęcia kontraktu

Czerwiec 28, 2026

Analityka zamawiającegoPRO
🔒
Odblokuj analitykę zamawiającego
Zobacz wzorce wydatków, preferowane procedury i więcej.
Uaktualnij do wersji profesjonalnej →
Budget
£300,000
Duration
2 months
Lokalizacja
Hampshire and Isle of Wight
Type
Open Procedure
67
Ocena Jakości/100
Dobra

Oryginalny Opis Przetargu

Uniwersytet w Winchesterze zaprasza wykonawców do składania ofert na prace związane z odnowieniem i układaniem podłóg w trzech naszych blokach mieszkalnych w Queens Road Student Village.

Analiza ryzyka

Zaloguj się, aby korzystać z analizy ryzyka.

Zaloguj się

Strategia wygrywania

Zaloguj się, aby uzyskać dostęp do rekomendacji strategii wygrywania.

Zaloguj się

Konkurenci

Ulepsz plan, aby zobaczyć, które firmy prawdopodobnie złożą ofertę w tym przetargu, na podstawie historycznych danych zamówień publicznych.

Zaloguj się

Wymagania i Kwalifikacje

12 wymagań w 5 kategoriach

Składanie (3)
Obowiązkowe (1)
Zgodność (1)
Techniczne (5)
Finansowe (2)
SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS3
--Submit a tender response by the deadline of March 27, 2026, at 00:00:00.
--Submit the tender response via the University of Winchester's electronic tendering site.
--Adhere to the outlined login, registration, e-signature, and submission process for the electronic tendering site.
MANDATORY EXCLUSION GROUNDS1
--No specific mandatory exclusion grounds are detailed in the provided information.
ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS1
--Must be a contractor capable of performing construction work, specifically redecoration and flooring works.
TECHNICAL CAPABILITY REQUIREMENTS5
--Must be capable of performing redecoration works in residential blocks.
--Must be capable of performing flooring works in residential blocks.
--Must be able to complete works across three residential blocks within Queens Road Student Village.
FINANCIAL REQUIREMENTS2
--Must be able to undertake a contract with an estimated value of £300,000.
--The price of the proposed works will be evaluated, accounting for 70% of the overall tender score.

Podgląd wymagań

Zarejestruj się, aby zobaczyć pełne wymagania i analizę

Dokumenty

5 dokumentów dostępnych z podsumowaniami AI

Lot L-1HTM
L-1.html

This document outlines the login, registration, e-signature, and submission process for the University of Winchester's electronic tendering site.

OCDS RecordDOC
013903-2026_ocds_record.json

This OCDS record provides structured data about the University of Winchester's tender for redecoration and flooring works at three student residential blocks, including buyer details and publication metadata.

OCDS Release PackageDOC
013903-2026_ocds_release.json

This document is an OCDS data package providing structured information about the University of Winchester's tender for redecoration and flooring works in three residential blocks.

Official PDF VersionPDF
013903-2026_official.pdf

The University of Winchester invites contractors to submit tenders by March 27, 2026, for redecoration and flooring works in three residential blocks, valued at £300,000, with evaluation based on 70% price and 30% quality.

Tender NoticeHTM
013903-2026.html

The University of Winchester invites contractors to submit tenders for redecoration and flooring works across three residential blocks at Queens Road Student Village, with submissions due by March 27, 2026, and evaluation based on price (70%) and quality (30%).

Podgląd dokumentów

Zarejestruj się, aby zobaczyć podsumowania i analizę dokumentów

67
Dobra

Ocena Jakości Przetargu

This tender provides basic information for a refurbishment project but is significantly hampered by numerous data inconsistencies and contradictions across key fields. While the procedure type and core requirements are clear, these inconsistencies pose a risk to clarity, completeness, and data reliability for potential bidders.

Szczegółowy Wynik

Zgodność z przepisami75/100

The tender generally complies with basic requirements for an open, below-threshold procedure. The CPV code is correct, and there are no disputes. However, the contradiction between "Value Classified: Yes" and the disclosed estimated value raises transparency concerns. The AI summary also lacks specific mandatory exclusion grounds.

Contradiction: 'Value Classified: Yes' vs disclosed estimated value
Lack of specific mandatory exclusion grounds in AI summary
Przejrzystość80/100

The project description and core requirements are clear. However, a direct contradiction exists between the AI-extracted evaluation criteria (70% price, 30% quality) and the 'Issues' flag ('No evaluation criteria specified'). The mention of 'Divided into Parts' without further detail also adds ambiguity.

Contradiction regarding evaluation criteria (AI-extracted vs Issues flag)
Lack of detail on 'Divided into Parts'
Kompletność70/100

Most essential information (title, reference, organization, description, deadlines, value, duration, CPV, NUTS) is present. Documents are listed. However, critical inconsistencies in financial value currency (EUR vs GBP) and submission deadline time, along with the 'Value Classified: Yes' flag, make the financial information incomplete or confusing. Details on 'parts' are also missing.

Currency discrepancy for estimated value (EUR vs GBP)
Submission deadline time discrepancy (12:00 vs 00:00)
Uczciwość85/100

The tender appears generally fair with an open procedure, a reasonable submission period, and objective evaluation criteria (70% price, 30% quality) as stated in the AI-extracted requirements. Electronic submission is supported, and requirements are generic. The 'Value Classified: Yes' flag, despite the value being disclosed, creates a minor transparency concern.

Contradiction: 'Value Classified: Yes' vs disclosed value
Praktyczność65/100

Electronic submission is supported, and the contract start date and duration are clearly specified. However, no direct document URL is provided in the snippet, and detailed financing information beyond the estimated value is absent.

No direct document URL provided in the snippet
Limited detailed financing information
Spójność danych30/100

This category suffers significantly from multiple, high-impact contradictions. These include currency (EUR vs GBP) and classification of the estimated value, discrepancy in submission deadline time, conflicting statements on evaluation criteria, and conflicting statements on e-submission. These inconsistencies make the tender documentation unreliable.

Currency discrepancy for estimated value (EUR vs GBP)
Contradiction: 'Value Classified: Yes' vs disclosed value
Zrównoważony rozwój20/100

There is no mention of green procurement, social aspects, or innovation focus within the provided information. This indicates a complete lack of integration of sustainability principles.

No green procurement criteria
No social aspects mentioned

Mocne strony

Clear project description and scope
Open competition procedure
Electronic submission supported
Objective evaluation criteria (price/quality split) are stated in AI-extracted requirements
CPV code and NUTS code provided

Wątpliwości

Multiple critical data inconsistencies (estimated value currency/classification, submission deadline time, evaluation criteria, e-submission)
Lack of detail on how the tender is 'Divided into Parts'
Absence of sustainability, social, or innovation considerations
Contradiction between 'Value Classified: Yes' and the disclosed estimated value

Rekomendacje

1. Rectify all conflicting information, especially regarding the estimated value (currency and classification), submission deadline time, and evaluation criteria, to ensure a single, consistent source of truth.
2. Provide clear details on the scope and requirements for each 'part' if the tender is divided, to allow bidders to understand the full structure.
3. Consider incorporating green procurement, social clauses, or innovation requirements to align with modern public procurement best practices.

Podgląd oceny AI

Zarejestruj się, aby zobaczyć pełne wymagania i analizę

Pełna analiza oceny jakości
Szczegółowy rozkład ocen cząstkowych
Mocne strony i obawy – informacje
Rekomendacje strategiczne

Karta kredytowa nie jest wymagana • Konfiguracja w 2 minuty

Nowa usługa

Chcesz, żebyśmy zajęli się tym przetargiem?

Nasi eksperci ds. zamówień publicznych przygotowują wszystko. Sprawdzone rozwiązanie — Ty przeglądasz, zatwierdzasz i składasz.

~1hTylko Twój czas
80%+80%+
$0Z góry
Zobacz pełne porównanie
Bez TaaSZ TaaS
40–80 godz.
Czas przygotowania
~1 godz.
Tylko Twój czas
15–25%
Średni wskaźnik wygranych
80%+
Wskaźnik wygranych
Ryzyko błędów
Ręczna kontrola
Ekspert QA
Kontrola zgodności
Robisz wszystko sam
Zajmujesz się wszystkim
My robimy wszystko
Kompleksowa obsługa
Wygrajmy ten przetarg!
Płacisz tylko w przypadku wygranej — tylko opłata za sukces · Zaufanie ponad 400 firm
Lub zrób to sam

Dodaj do pipeline'u