Ønsker du å legge inn bud på offentlige anbud? Se vår TaaS-tjeneste for anbudsklargjøring
Anbud

Dartmouth Park & Ride

Lukket

Fristen for innlevering er utløpt

Fristen for innlevering av dette anbudet er utløpt og aksepterer ikke lenger søknader. Informasjonen nedenfor beholdes for referanseformål.

Se aktive anbud
Frist
Utløpt
mars 09, 2026
Kontraktsdetaljer
Kategori
Open Procedure
Referanse
012014-2026
Verdi
£600,000
Sted
Devon, Storbritannia
Publisert
april 12, 2026
CPV-kode
Prosjektets tidslinje

Anbud publisert

februar 10, 2026

Frist for spørsmål

mars 02, 2026

Frist for innlevering

mars 09, 2026

Kontraktens startdato

mars 25, 2026

KjøperinnsiktPRO
🔒
Lås opp kjøperinnsikt
Se forbruksmønstre, foretrukne prosedyrer og mer.
Oppgrader til Professional →
Budsjett
£600,000
Varighet
37 måneder
Sted
Devon
Type
Open Procedure
67
Kvalitetsscore/100
God

Opprinnelig anbudsbeskrivelse

A 3 + 1 year contract for the provision of a park and ride service in Dartmouth. The full details of this can be found within Volume 3 of the Invitation To Tender documents, this will include the specification, scoring criteria, etc.

Risikoanalyse

Risikoanalyse er ikke tilgjengelig for dette landets anbud ennå. Støttes for øyeblikket: Estland, Latvia, Litauen, Polen, Frankrike, Storbritannia, Danmark, Nederland, Norge og Finland.

Vinnstrategi

Få en AI-drevet vinnerstrategi skreddersydd for dette anbudet. Inkluderer sannsynlighetsscore for å vinne, viktige muligheter og utfordringer, anbefalte fokusområder for tilbudet, innsikt i konkurranseposisjonering og handlingsrettede anbefalinger for å maksimere sjansene dine.

Logg inn

Konkurrenter

Oppgrader for å se hvilke selskaper som sannsynligvis vil legge inn tilbud på dette anbudet, basert på historiske anskaffelsesdata.

Logg inn

Krav og kvalifikasjoner

11 krav på tvers av 3 kategorier

Innlevering (5)
Teknisk (4)
Finansiell (2)
SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS5
--Submit the bid electronically via the ProActis portal.
--Submit the bid by the deadline: March 9, 2026, 12:00:00 UTC.
--Provide a quality proposal that addresses the scoring criteria, as quality accounts for 30% of the evaluation.
TECHNICAL CAPABILITY REQUIREMENTS4
--Demonstrate capability to provide public road transport services (CPV 60112000).
--Demonstrate capability to provide a park and ride service in Dartmouth.
--Be able to deliver a contract for a duration of 3+1 years (37 months).
FINANCIAL REQUIREMENTS2
--Be able to deliver a service with an estimated contract value of approximately £500,000 (ex VAT) / 600,000 EUR.
--Submit a competitive price proposal, as price accounts for 70% of the evaluation criteria.

Forhåndsvisning av krav

Registrer deg for å se komplette krav og analyser

Dokumenter

3 dokumenter tilgjengelig med AI-sammendrag

OCDS RecordDOC
012014-2026_ocds_record.json

This OCDS record provides structured data about a tender from South Hams District Council for a 3+1 year park and ride service in Dartmouth, including buyer details and the tender's planning status.

Vis
OCDS Release PackageDOC
012014-2026_ocds_release.json

This OCDS Release Package provides structured, machine-readable data about the tender for a 3+1 year park and ride service in Dartmouth, published by South Hams District Council.

Vis
Official PDF VersionPDF
012014-2026_official.pdf

South Hams District Council is seeking bids for a 3+1 year park and ride service in Dartmouth, with an estimated value of £500,000, requiring electronic submission via the ProActis portal by March 9, 2026.

Vis

Forhåndsvisning av dokumenter

Registrer deg for å se dokumentoppsummeringer og analyser

67
God

Anbudskvalitetsscore

This tender presents a generally clear and fair procurement process with good legal compliance, but suffers from significant data inconsistencies regarding contract duration and practical hurdles due to missing document access information. Sustainability aspects are entirely absent.

Poengfordeling

Juridisk samsvar75/100

The tender defines the procedure type and CPV codes clearly, and the submission period of 27 days is reasonable for an open procedure. However, the absence of a clear reveal date is a minor administrative oversight.

Missing tender reveal date
Klarhet80/100

The description of the service and the high-level evaluation criteria (70% price, 30% quality) are clear. Detailed requirements and scoring criteria are appropriately referred to Volume 3 of the ITT documents, which is standard practice.

Fullstendighet65/100

Basic information, estimated value, and key dates are provided. However, the full specification and detailed criteria are externalized to Volume 3, and the provided data does not offer direct access to its content, limiting the completeness of the immediate tender information.

Full specification and detailed criteria not directly accessible in provided data
Inconsistency in contract duration description
Rettferdighet80/100

The tender discloses the estimated value and supports electronic submission, promoting equal access. The evaluation criteria split is transparent, and requirements appear generic. Fairness largely depends on the accessibility of Volume 3 to all bidders.

Praktisk gjennomførbarhet60/100

Electronic submission is supported, and the contract start date is known. However, the absence of a direct URL or clear instructions for accessing the full tender documents (Volume 3) poses a significant practical barrier for potential bidders.

No direct URL or clear instructions for accessing full tender documents (Volume 3)
Datakonsistens50/100

A major inconsistency exists between the stated '3 + 1 year contract' and the '37 months' contract duration, as 3+1 years typically equates to 48 months. This ambiguity requires clarification. Some minor fields like 'Liable Person' and procedure codes are also unpopulated.

Inconsistency between '3 + 1 year contract' and '37 months' duration
Missing 'Liable Person' and procedure codes
Bærekraft20/100

The tender makes no mention of green procurement, social aspects, or innovation focus. This indicates a complete lack of integration of sustainability considerations.

No green procurement criteria
No social aspects considered

Styrker

Clear procedure type and CPV code
Electronic submission supported via ProActis portal
Transparent evaluation criteria split (70% price, 30% quality)
Estimated value and key dates (submission, start) are specified
No disputes or suspensions reported

Bekymringer

Significant inconsistency in contract duration (3+1 years vs. 37 months)
Lack of direct URL or clear access instructions for full tender documents (Volume 3)
Absence of sustainability, social, or innovation criteria
Missing tender reveal date
Reliance on external documents for detailed requirements and criteria

Anbefalinger

1. Clarify the exact contract duration to resolve the '3+1 year' vs. '37 months' inconsistency.
2. Provide a direct URL or explicit instructions for accessing all tender documents, especially Volume 3.
3. Integrate sustainability, social, or innovation criteria into future procurement processes to align with modern best practices.

Forhåndsvisning av AI-score

Registrer deg for å se komplette krav og analyser

Fullstendig analyse av kvalitetsresultat
Detaljert nedbrytning av delresultater
Innsikt i styrker og bekymringer
Strategiske anbefalinger

Ingen kredittkort kreves • Oppsett på 2 minutter

Legg til i pipeline