Ønsker du å legge inn bud på offentlige anbud? Se vår TaaS-tjeneste for anbudsklargjøring
Anbud

Print Løsninger

Åpen
Frist
525 dager igjen
september 30, 2027
Kontraktsdetaljer
Kategori
Restricted Procedure
Referanse
022489-2023
Verdi
£5,500,000
Sted
United Kingdom, Storbritannia
Publisert
april 16, 2026
CPV-kode
Prosjektets tidslinje

Anbud publisert

august 02, 2023

Frist for spørsmål

september 23, 2027

Frist for innlevering

september 30, 2027

Kontraktens startdato

september 30, 2023

KjøperinnsiktPRO
🔒
Lås opp kjøperinnsikt
Se forbruksmønstre, foretrukne prosedyrer og mer.
Oppgrader til Professional →
Budsjett
£5,500,000
Varighet
24 måneder
Sted
United Kingdom
Type
Restricted Procedure
70
Kvalitetsscore/100
God

Opprinnelig anbudsbeskrivelse

NWUPC etablerer et DPS for levering og tilbud av Print Løsninger, delt inn i kategorier. DPS vil være åpen for søknader og videre konkurranser.

Risikoanalyse

Risikoanalyse er ikke tilgjengelig for dette landets anbud ennå. Støttes for øyeblikket: Estland, Latvia, Litauen, Polen, Frankrike, Storbritannia, Danmark, Nederland, Norge og Finland.

Vinnstrategi

Få en AI-drevet vinnerstrategi skreddersydd for dette anbudet. Inkluderer sannsynlighetsscore for å vinne, viktige muligheter og utfordringer, anbefalte fokusområder for tilbudet, innsikt i konkurranseposisjonering og handlingsrettede anbefalinger for å maksimere sjansene dine.

Logg inn

Konkurrenter

Oppgrader for å se hvilke selskaper som sannsynligvis vil legge inn tilbud på dette anbudet, basert på historiske anskaffelsesdata.

Logg inn

Krav og kvalifikasjoner

11 krav på tvers av 5 kategorier

Innlevering (4)
Obligatorisk (1)
Overholdelse (4)
Teknisk (1)
Finansiell (1)
SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS4
--Must submit a DPS Application.
--The initial DPS Application must be submitted by 8th September 2023 13:00.
--Must be prepared for post-submission clarifications during the initial establishment phase (8th September 2023 - 22nd September 2023).
MANDATORY EXCLUSION GROUNDS1
--No specific mandatory exclusion grounds are mentioned in the provided text.
ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS4
--Must be a supplier capable of providing 'Print Solutions'.
--Must be willing to provide services to members of HEPCW, LUPC, NEUPC, NWUPC & SUPC (the university purchasing consortia).
--Must apply for admission to the Dynamic Purchasing System (DPS).
TECHNICAL CAPABILITY REQUIREMENTS1
--Must be able to supply and provide 'Print Solutions' as per the scope of the DPS.
FINANCIAL REQUIREMENTS1
--No specific financial requirements (e.g., minimum turnover, financial stability) are mentioned in the provided text.

Forhåndsvisning av krav

Registrer deg for å se komplette krav og analyser

Dokumenter

3 dokumenter tilgjengelig med AI-sammendrag

OCDS RecordDOC
022489-2023_ocds_record.json

Ingen sammendrag tilgjengelig for dette dokumentet.

Vis
OCDS Release PackageDOC
022489-2023_ocds_release.json

Ingen sammendrag tilgjengelig for dette dokumentet.

Vis
Official PDF VersionPDF
022489-2023_official.pdf

This document is a contract notice announcing the establishment of a Dynamic Purchasing System (DPS) for Print Solutions by NWUPC, inviting suppliers to apply for admission to provide services to multiple university purchasing consortia.

Vis

Forhåndsvisning av dokumenter

Registrer deg for å se dokumentoppsummeringer og analyser

70
God

Anbudskvalitetsscore

This tender describes a Dynamic Purchasing System (DPS) for print solutions, which offers flexibility for ongoing market access. However, the critical absence of detailed tender documentation and specific requirements significantly hinders transparency, fairness, and the ability for potential suppliers to submit a comprehensive application.

Poengfordeling

Juridisk samsvar100/100

The use of a Dynamic Purchasing System (DPS) is a legally recognized procurement procedure. However, the provided text lacks specific mandatory exclusion grounds and detailed eligibility/financial requirements, which are fundamental for legal clarity. The complete absence of actual tender documents is a major legal and procedural deficiency.

No specific mandatory exclusion grounds are explicitly mentioned, relying on general legal frameworks.
Absence of any actual tender documents, which are essential for legal compliance and transparency.
Klarhet40/100

The overall structure of the DPS, including its division into categories and the involvement of multiple purchasing consortia, is clearly outlined. The timeline for the DPS establishment and its duration is also well-defined. However, the actual requirements for suppliers are presented at a very high level, lacking the necessary detail for clarity.

Lack of detailed technical, financial, and eligibility requirements, making 'Print Solutions' an overly broad term without further definition.
Absence of specific evaluation criteria for admission to the DPS or for subsequent mini-competitions.
Fullstendighet83/100

The provided information is highly incomplete. While it outlines the DPS structure and timeline, it critically lacks fundamental tender documentation. Key elements such as a detailed scope of services, technical specifications, specific financial requirements, and evaluation criteria are entirely missing.

Critical absence of any tender documents ('DOCUMENTS (0 total)').
Missing detailed scope and specifications for 'Print Solutions' and its categories.
Rettferdighet80/100

The DPS mechanism itself is designed to promote fairness by allowing new entrants throughout its duration, which is a strength. However, the significant lack of detailed, objective requirements and evaluation criteria raises serious concerns about potential subjectivity and unequal treatment during the admission process or subsequent mini-competitions. The absence of documents makes a full assessment of fairness impossible.

Lack of specific, objective eligibility, technical, and financial requirements could lead to subjective assessment and potential bias.
Absence of evaluation criteria for DPS admission and subsequent competitions compromises transparency and equal treatment.
Praktisk gjennomførbarhet40/100

The DPS structure is practical for managing recurring procurement needs and offers flexibility for both the contracting authority and suppliers. However, the severe lack of detailed information and supporting documents makes it highly impractical for potential suppliers to prepare a robust and competitive application without extensive prior engagement or clarification.

Suppliers cannot adequately prepare an application without detailed requirements, specifications, and evaluation criteria.
The absence of documents makes it difficult for potential bidders to understand the full scope and expectations, leading to increased administrative burden for clarifications.
Datakonsistens100/100

There is a notable inconsistency in how the 'Submission Deadline' is presented for a continuously open DPS. While the DPS commenced in 2023 and is open for new requests, the 'Submission Deadline: 2027-09-30' is misleading as an application deadline for new entrants. It likely refers to the overall end date of the DPS, which should be clarified to avoid confusion.

The 'Submission Deadline: 2027-09-30' is inconsistent with the nature of a continuously open DPS for new requests to participate, creating potential confusion for suppliers regarding the application window.
Bærekraft0/100

The tender description provides no information regarding environmental, social, or innovation criteria. This indicates a missed opportunity to integrate sustainability objectives into the procurement process.

Complete absence of any sustainability (environmental, social) or innovation criteria.

Styrker

Utilizes a Dynamic Purchasing System (DPS), promoting flexibility and continuous market access for suppliers.
Clearly identifies the multiple university purchasing consortia involved, indicating a collaborative approach.
Estimated value and contract duration are specified, providing financial context.
DPS is divided into categories, allowing for specialized suppliers to participate.
The DPS is explicitly stated to be open for new requests to participate throughout its duration, ensuring ongoing market opportunities.

Bekymringer

Critical lack of tender documents ('DOCUMENTS (0 total)'), making a comprehensive assessment and supplier participation extremely difficult.
Insufficient detail in eligibility, technical, and financial requirements, hindering fair competition and objective evaluation.
Absence of any stated evaluation criteria for DPS admission or subsequent mini-competitions, raising transparency and fairness concerns.
No integration of sustainability (environmental, social) or innovation criteria, missing an opportunity for responsible procurement.
Data inconsistency regarding the 'Submission Deadline' for a continuously open DPS, which could confuse potential new applicants.

Anbefalinger

1. Publish comprehensive tender documents, including detailed specifications, eligibility criteria, financial requirements, and a clear evaluation methodology for DPS admission and subsequent call-offs.
2. Clearly define the scope of 'Print Solutions' and the specific categories within the DPS to ensure clarity for potential suppliers.
3. Integrate relevant sustainability (environmental, social) and innovation criteria into the DPS requirements and evaluation framework.

Forhåndsvisning av AI-score

Registrer deg for å se komplette krav og analyser

Fullstendig analyse av kvalitetsresultat
Detaljert nedbrytning av delresultater
Innsikt i styrker og bekymringer
Strategiske anbefalinger

Ingen kredittkort kreves • Oppsett på 2 minutter

Legg til i pipeline