Ønsker du å legge inn bud på offentlige anbud? Se vår TaaS-tjeneste for anbudsklargjøring
Anbud

Portadown flomsikringsprosjekt Fase 1

Åpen
Frist
173 dager igjen
november 01, 2026
Kontraktsdetaljer
Kategori
Restricted Procedure
Referanse
007137-2026
Verdi
£57,600,000
Sted
Northern Ireland, Storbritannia
Publisert
mai 04, 2026
CPV-kode
Prosjektets tidslinje

Anbud publisert

januar 27, 2026

Frist for spørsmål

oktober 25, 2026

Frist for innlevering

november 01, 2026

Kontraktens startdato

november 01, 2026

Budsjett
£57,600,000
Varighet
73 måneder
Sted
Northern Ireland
Type
Restricted Procedure
67
Kvalitetsscore/100
God

Opprinnelig anbudsbeskrivelse

Økonomiske aktører inviteres til å søke i en NEC-deltakelsesprosess for Portadown flomsikringsprosjekt. Opptil 8 leverandører vil bli kortlistet for tilbudsfasen for Fase 1. De 6 best rangerte tilbyderne vil bli utnevnt til en rammeavtale og invitert til å gi tilbud for Fase 2 og Fase 3.

Risikoanalyse

Risikoanalyse er ikke tilgjengelig for dette landets anbud ennå. Støttes for øyeblikket: Estland, Latvia, Litauen, Polen, Frankrike, Storbritannia, Danmark, Nederland, Norge og Finland.

Vinnstrategi

Få en AI-drevet vinnerstrategi skreddersydd for dette anbudet. Inkluderer sannsynlighetsscore for å vinne, viktige muligheter og utfordringer, anbefalte fokusområder for tilbudet, innsikt i konkurranseposisjonering og handlingsrettede anbefalinger for å maksimere sjansene dine.

Logg inn

Konkurrenter

Oppgrader for å se hvilke selskaper som sannsynligvis vil legge inn tilbud på dette anbudet, basert på historiske anskaffelsesdata.

Logg inn

Krav og kvalifikasjoner

12 krav på tvers av 5 kategorier

Innlevering (4)
Obligatorisk (1)
Overholdelse (4)
Teknisk (2)
Finansiell (1)
SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS4
--Apply in the initial NEC Participation Stage process.
--Adhere to the Participation Stage submission deadline of 2026-11-01T00:00:00+00:00.
--If shortlisted from the Participation Stage, submit a tender for Phase 1 of the Portadown Flood Alleviation Scheme.
MANDATORY EXCLUSION GROUNDS1
--Suppliers must not be subject to any mandatory exclusion grounds.
ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS4
--Satisfy all completeness and compliance checks during the Participation Stage.
--Satisfy all requirements related to legal capacity during the Participation Stage.
--Achieve sufficiently high overall scores in the Participation Stage evaluation to be shortlisted (up to 8 suppliers, including ties).
TECHNICAL CAPABILITY REQUIREMENTS2
--Demonstrate proven technical capability and experience in civil engineering works, specifically for flood alleviation schemes.
--Be familiar with NEC contracts, as the procurement involves an NEC Participation Stage process.
FINANCIAL REQUIREMENTS1
--Satisfy all requirements related to financial capacity during the Participation Stage.

Forhåndsvisning av krav

Registrer deg for å se komplette krav og analyser

Dokumenter

3 dokumenter tilgjengelig med AI-sammendrag

OCDS RecordDOC
007137-2026_ocds_record.json

This tender outlines a restricted procurement process for the Portadown Flood Alleviation Scheme, requiring an initial Participation Stage to shortlist up to 8 suppliers based on legal, financial, and scoring criteria for Phase 1, with a Framework Agreement for subsequent phases.

Vis
OCDS Release PackageDOC
007137-2026_ocds_release.json

This tender outlines a restricted procurement process for the Portadown Flood Alleviation Scheme, involving a participation stage to shortlist up to 8 suppliers for Phase 1, with the top 6 forming a framework for subsequent phases.

Vis
Official PDF VersionPDF
007137-2026_official.pdf

This document is a tender notice for the Portadown Flood Alleviation Scheme, detailing a two-stage restricted procurement process involving an initial Participation Stage to shortlist up to 8 suppliers for Phase 1, followed by the establishment of a Framework Agreement for the top 6 ranked tenderers for subsequent phases.

Vis

Forhåndsvisning av dokumenter

Registrer deg for å se dokumentoppsummeringer og analyser

67
God

Anbudskvalitetsscore

This tender outlines a complex multi-stage procurement for a significant flood alleviation scheme, demonstrating good clarity in process description but suffering from critical issues such as missing detailed evaluation criteria, lack of e-submission, and an irrelevant attached document.

Poengfordeling

Juridisk samsvar75/100

The tender clearly defines the restricted procedure and competitive flexible approach, with an appropriate CPV code. The submission deadline for the Participation Stage is exceptionally generous, ensuring ample preparation time. However, the absence of detailed evaluation criteria and a missing reveal date are minor transparency concerns.

Missing detailed evaluation criteria and weightings
Missing reveal date
Klarhet80/100

The description of the multi-stage process, including shortlisting, tie-breaking rules, and the framework agreement for subsequent phases, is very clear and unambiguous. Requirements are well-categorized. The primary deficiency is the lack of specific, detailed evaluation criteria and their weightings for the Participation Stage and Phase 1.

No specific, detailed evaluation criteria and weightings provided
Fullstendighet70/100

Basic information such as title, reference, organization, estimated value, duration, and location are well-provided. However, the inclusion of an entirely irrelevant document (Lichfield District Council tender) is a significant error in the tender package. Furthermore, detailed evaluation criteria are not fully defined.

Irrelevant document attached to the tender package
Missing detailed evaluation criteria and weightings
Rettferdighet65/100

The tender value is disclosed, and the deadline for the Participation Stage is very reasonable, promoting fair preparation. Requirements do not appear tailored to a specific company. Nevertheless, the absence of detailed evaluation criteria reduces transparency and objectivity, and the lack of e-submission creates a barrier to equal access for potential bidders.

No e-submission functionality
Missing detailed evaluation criteria and weightings
Praktisk gjennomførbarhet55/100

The absence of electronic submission support is a major practical drawback in modern procurement. The contract start date being identical to the submission deadline is illogical and creates ambiguity, hindering practical planning. While documents are available, a direct URL is not explicitly provided in the summary.

No e-submission functionality
Illogical contract start date (same as submission deadline)
Datakonsistens55/100

Most key fields are populated, and no disputes are reported. However, the 'Liable Person' field is empty, and codes for 'Type' and 'Procedure' are missing. Critically, the contract start date is identical to the submission deadline, which is illogical. The presence of an irrelevant document also indicates a significant inconsistency in the overall tender data package.

Contract start date is illogical (same as submission deadline)
Irrelevant document attached
Bærekraft50/100

The tender explicitly mentions 'social value' as a criterion for Phases 2 and 3, which is a positive inclusion of social aspects. However, there is no explicit focus on green procurement or innovation in the provided information for the initial stages, and it is not EU funded.

No explicit green procurement focus
No explicit innovation focus

Styrker

Clear description of the multi-stage procurement process and framework
High estimated value disclosed and not classified
Very reasonable deadline for the Participation Stage (over 9 months)
CPV code is appropriate for the works
Requirements appear generic and not tailored

Bekymringer

Missing detailed evaluation criteria and weightings for all stages
Lack of e-submission functionality
Inclusion of an irrelevant document in the tender package
Illogical contract start date (same as submission deadline)
Limited explicit focus on green procurement or innovation

Anbefalinger

1. Publish detailed evaluation criteria and weightings for all stages to enhance transparency and fairness.
2. Implement e-submission functionality to improve accessibility and efficiency of the procurement process.
3. Rectify the tender package by removing irrelevant documents and ensuring all attached files pertain to this specific tender.

Forhåndsvisning av AI-score

Registrer deg for å se komplette krav og analyser

Fullstendig analyse av kvalitetsresultat
Detaljert nedbrytning av delresultater
Innsikt i styrker og bekymringer
Strategiske anbefalinger

Ingen kredittkort kreves • Oppsett på 2 minutter

Legg til i pipeline