Ønsker du å legge inn bud på offentlige anbud? Se vår TaaS-tjeneste for anbudsklargjøring
Anbud

Merton Voksenopplæring Hovedleveringstjeneste

Åpen
Frist
109 dager igjen
august 02, 2026
Kontraktsdetaljer
Kategori
Open Procedure
Referanse
005889-2026
Verdi
£3,900,000
Sted
Outer London - South, Storbritannia
Publisert
april 08, 2026
CPV-kode
Prosjektets tidslinje

Anbud publisert

januar 22, 2026

Frist for spørsmål

juli 26, 2026

Frist for innlevering

august 02, 2026

Kontraktens startdato

august 02, 2026

KjøperinnsiktPRO
🔒
Lås opp kjøperinnsikt
Se forbruksmønstre, foretrukne prosedyrer og mer.
Oppgrader til Professional →
Budsjett
£3,900,000
Varighet
36 måneder
Sted
Outer London - South
Type
Open Procedure
61
Kvalitetsscore/100
God

Opprinnelig anbudsbeskrivelse

Rådet tilbyr voksenopplæringstjenester for innbyggerne i bydelen. Denne kontrakten gjelder levering av hovedkontrakten for voksenopplæring på vegne av rådet i Merton, med prioritering av innbyggernes ferdigheter og velferdsbehov.

Risikoanalyse

Risikoanalyse er ikke tilgjengelig for dette landets anbud ennå. Støttes for øyeblikket: Estland, Latvia, Litauen, Polen, Frankrike, Storbritannia, Danmark, Nederland, Norge og Finland.

Vinnstrategi

Få en AI-drevet vinnerstrategi skreddersydd for dette anbudet. Inkluderer sannsynlighetsscore for å vinne, viktige muligheter og utfordringer, anbefalte fokusområder for tilbudet, innsikt i konkurranseposisjonering og handlingsrettede anbefalinger for å maksimere sjansene dine.

Logg inn

Konkurrenter

Oppgrader for å se hvilke selskaper som sannsynligvis vil legge inn tilbud på dette anbudet, basert på historiske anskaffelsesdata.

Logg inn

Krav og kvalifikasjoner

10 krav på tvers av 5 kategorier

Innlevering (2)
Obligatorisk (1)
Overholdelse (1)
Teknisk (5)
Finansiell (1)
SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS2
--Submit bids by 24 February 2026.
--The bid must be structured to address the award criteria: Quality (50%), Price (45%), and Social Value (5%).
MANDATORY EXCLUSION GROUNDS1
--(No specific requirements found in the provided text.)
ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS1
--(No specific requirements found in the provided text.)
TECHNICAL CAPABILITY REQUIREMENTS5
--Bidder must be capable of delivering adult education services.
--Services provided must prioritize the skills and wellbeing needs of Merton residents.
--Services must be delivered within the Borough of Merton.
FINANCIAL REQUIREMENTS1
--The bid must include a clear pricing proposal for the adult learning services.

Forhåndsvisning av krav

Registrer deg for å se komplette krav og analyser

Dokumenter

3 dokumenter tilgjengelig med AI-sammendrag

OCDS RecordDOC
005889-2026_ocds_record.json

This OCDS data record provides structured information about the London Borough of Merton's tender for adult education services, detailing the buyer and the planning phase of the procurement.

Vis
OCDS Release PackageDOC
005889-2026_ocds_release.json

This OCDS Release Package provides structured data detailing the London Borough of Merton's tender for the Main Adult Learning Service Contract, focusing on residents' skills and wellbeing needs.

Vis
Official PDF VersionPDF
005889-2026_official.pdf

This document is a tender notice for the London Borough of Merton's £3.9M adult education services contract, detailing the 3-year term, 24 February 2026 submission deadline, and award criteria weighted 50% Quality, 45% Price, and 5% Social Value.

Vis

Forhåndsvisning av dokumenter

Registrer deg for å se dokumentoppsummeringer og analyser

61
God

Anbudskvalitetsscore

This tender for adult learning services exhibits significant data inconsistencies and practical flaws, particularly regarding deadlines and contract start, alongside a lack of detailed requirements. While basic information and award criteria are clear, the overall quality is hampered by these critical issues.

Poengfordeling

Juridisk samsvar75/100

The tender defines the procedure type and CPV codes clearly. Deadlines are reasonable from today's date. However, the AI-extracted requirements lack explicit mention of mandatory exclusion grounds and detailed eligibility criteria, which are fundamental legal requirements, suggesting potential incompleteness in the provided summary of legal aspects.

Missing explicit mandatory exclusion and eligibility grounds in AI summary.
Klarhet70/100

The overall description of the service and the award criteria (Quality, Price, Social Value) are clear. However, the AI-extracted technical, eligibility, and exclusion requirements are either very high-level or missing, which reduces the overall clarity for potential bidders on specific expectations.

High-level or missing detailed technical, eligibility, and exclusion requirements.
Fullstendighet65/100

Basic information, estimated value, and duration are present. However, the AI-extracted requirements indicate a lack of explicit mandatory exclusion and eligibility criteria. Furthermore, while documents are listed, their summaries suggest they are administrative/OCDS data, and a detailed 'tender specification' document with comprehensive requirements appears to be missing from the provided content.

Missing explicit mandatory exclusion and eligibility criteria.
Apparent lack of a detailed tender specification document.
Rettferdighet65/100

The estimated value is disclosed, and requirements do not appear tailored. Award criteria are transparent and the 'Divided into Parts' characteristic is positive. However, the automated check indicates no e-submission, which significantly hinders equal access. The potential incompleteness of accessible documentation also impacts fairness.

No e-submission.
Potential incompleteness of detailed tender documentation.
Praktisk gjennomførbarhet45/100

The lack of electronic submission is a significant practical drawback. Critically, the contract start date is listed as the same day as the submission deadline, which is entirely impractical and illogical for any procurement process involving evaluation, award, and standstill periods.

No e-submission.
Illogical contract start date (same as submission deadline).
Datakonsistens35/100

There are severe inconsistencies in key dates: two different submission deadlines are provided (2026-08-02 vs. 24 February 2026). The contract start date is illogically set to the same day as one of the submission deadlines. Additionally, the 'Value Classified: Yes' flag contradicts the explicit disclosure of the estimated value.

Conflicting submission deadlines.
Illogical contract start date.
Bærekraft55/100

The tender explicitly includes social value aspects (5% weighting and requirement to address social value), which is a positive contribution to sustainability. However, there is no mention of green procurement or innovation focus, limiting its overall sustainability ambition.

No explicit green procurement or innovation focus.

Styrker

Clear definition of service and purpose.
Transparent award criteria (Quality, Price, Social Value).
Estimated value and duration are disclosed.
Includes social value aspects.
Procedure type and CPV codes are correctly assigned.

Bekymringer

Severe data inconsistencies regarding submission deadlines and contract start date.
Lack of explicit detailed technical specifications, eligibility, and exclusion criteria in the provided summaries.
No electronic submission option.
Illogical contract start date (same as submission deadline).
Apparent lack of a comprehensive tender specification document.

Anbefalinger

1. Rectify all data inconsistencies, especially conflicting deadlines and the illogical contract start date, and issue a clarification.
2. Provide a comprehensive tender specification document with detailed technical, eligibility, and exclusion criteria.
3. Implement an electronic submission system to enhance fairness and practicality for bidders.

Forhåndsvisning av AI-score

Registrer deg for å se komplette krav og analyser

Fullstendig analyse av kvalitetsresultat
Detaljert nedbrytning av delresultater
Innsikt i styrker og bekymringer
Strategiske anbefalinger

Ingen kredittkort kreves • Oppsett på 2 minutter

Ny tjeneste

Ønsker du at vi håndterer denne anbudskonkurransen?

Våre innkjøpseksperter forbereder alt. Du gjennomgår, godkjenner og sender inn.

~1hDin tid
80%+80 %+
$0På forhånd
Se full sammenligning
Uten TaaSMed TaaS
40-80 timer
Forberedelsestid
~1 time
Din tid
15-25 %
Gjennomsnittlig vinnerate
80 %+
Vinnerprosent
Risiko for feil
Manuell gjennomgang
Ekspert QA
Samsvarskontroll
Du gjør alt
Håndterer alt
Vi gjør alt
Heldekkende tjeneste
La oss vinne dette anbudet
Betal kun når du vinner · 400+ selskaper stoler på oss
Eller gjør det selv

Legg til i pipeline