Ønsker du å legge inn bud på offentlige anbud? Se vår TaaS-tjeneste for anbudsklargjøring
Anbud

ESPH De La Warr Pavilion – Hovedentreprenør (ESPH766)

Åpen
Frist
184 dager igjen
oktober 21, 2026
Kontraktsdetaljer
Kategori
Restricted Procedure
Referanse
027408-2026
Verdi
£16,560,000
Sted
Surrey, East and West Sussex, Storbritannia
Publisert
april 13, 2026
CPV-kode
Prosjektets tidslinje

Anbud publisert

mars 25, 2026

Frist for spørsmål

oktober 14, 2026

Frist for innlevering

oktober 21, 2026

Kontraktens startdato

oktober 21, 2026

KjøperinnsiktPRO
🔒
Lås opp kjøperinnsikt
Se forbruksmønstre, foretrukne prosedyrer og mer.
Oppgrader til Professional →
Budsjett
£16,560,000
Varighet
17 måneder
Sted
Surrey, East and West Sussex
Type
Restricted Procedure
75
Kvalitetsscore/100
God

Opprinnelig anbudsbeskrivelse

Rother District Council søker en kvalifisert og erfaren hovedentreprenør for auditorie- og foajearbeid ved De La Warr Pavilion, en fredet bygning av klasse I. Prosjektet omfatter renovering, ombygging av foajéområder og forbedret tilgjengelighet for besøkende. Omfanget inkluderer innvendig demontering, strukturelle reparasjoner, fasadeoppgraderinger, utskifting av MEP-tjenester og spesialiserte teaterinstallasjoner. Bygningen vil forbli delvis operativ.

Risikoanalyse

Risikoanalyse er ikke tilgjengelig for dette landets anbud ennå. Støttes for øyeblikket: Estland, Latvia, Litauen, Polen, Frankrike, Storbritannia, Danmark, Nederland, Norge og Finland.

Vinnstrategi

Få en AI-drevet vinnerstrategi skreddersydd for dette anbudet. Inkluderer sannsynlighetsscore for å vinne, viktige muligheter og utfordringer, anbefalte fokusområder for tilbudet, innsikt i konkurranseposisjonering og handlingsrettede anbefalinger for å maksimere sjansene dine.

Logg inn

Konkurrenter

Oppgrader for å se hvilke selskaper som sannsynligvis vil legge inn tilbud på dette anbudet, basert på historiske anskaffelsesdata.

Logg inn

Krav og kvalifikasjoner

27 krav på tvers av 5 kategorier

Innlevering (1)
Obligatorisk (1)
Overholdelse (1)
Teknisk (23)
Finansiell (1)
SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS1
--No specific submission requirements are detailed in the provided text.
MANDATORY EXCLUSION GROUNDS1
--No specific mandatory exclusion grounds are detailed in the provided text.
ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS1
--Must be a suitable qualified and experienced Main Contractor.
TECHNICAL CAPABILITY REQUIREMENTS23
--Experience in theatre construction work (CPV: 45212322).
--Experience in comprehensive refurbishment activities.
--Experience in renovating auditoriums.
FINANCIAL REQUIREMENTS1
--Value of the contract is 16,560,000 EUR.

Forhåndsvisning av krav

Registrer deg for å se komplette krav og analyser

Dokumenter

3 dokumenter tilgjengelig med AI-sammendrag

OCDS RecordDOC
027408-2026_ocds_record.json

Ingen sammendrag tilgjengelig for dette dokumentet.

Vis
OCDS Release PackageDOC
027408-2026_ocds_release.json

Ingen sammendrag tilgjengelig for dette dokumentet.

Vis
Official PDF VersionPDF
027408-2026_official.pdf

Ingen sammendrag tilgjengelig for dette dokumentet.

Vis

Forhåndsvisning av dokumenter

Registrer deg for å se dokumentoppsummeringer og analyser

75
God

Anbudskvalitetsscore

This tender for the De La Warr Pavilion refurbishment is generally well-structured with a clear scope of works and a substantial estimated value. However, it lacks explicit evaluation criteria and details on submission procedures, impacting overall transparency and accessibility.

Poengfordeling

Juridisk samsvar75/100

The tender adheres to basic legal requirements by providing a reference number, organization, CPV code, and a clear procedure type. The estimated value and contract duration are specified. The primary concern is the absence of a reveal date for the planned procurement notice, which is unusual and could indicate a deviation from standard timelines. The deadline, while provided, is noted as potentially short in the general checks.

Missing reveal date for planned procurement notice.
Klarhet80/100

The description of works is detailed and comprehensive, providing a good understanding of the project's scope, including specific refurbishment activities and the context of working within a live building. The AI-extracted requirements further break down the technical expectations. However, the lack of specified evaluation criteria leaves potential bidders uncertain about how their submissions will be assessed.

No evaluation criteria specified.
Fullstendighet70/100

Most essential information is present, including the title, reference, organization, estimated value, contract duration, and a detailed scope of works. The AI-extracted requirements also highlight the necessary qualifications. The main deficiency is the lack of accessible content for the attached tender documents, hindering a full assessment of completeness.

No document content available for attached tender documents.
Rettferdighet85/100

The tender is characterized by a competitive flexible procedure and a disclosed estimated value, which promotes fairness. The requirements are generally objective and based on experience and technical capability. The absence of specific company tailoring is positive. However, the lack of explicit evaluation criteria and the potential for a short deadline could be perceived as less fair to some bidders.

Praktisk gjennomførbarhet65/100

The tender specifies a contract start date and duration. However, the absence of information regarding e-submission procedures and financing details limits its practicality for potential bidders. The availability of documents is also hampered by the lack of content.

No e-submission specified.
No financing information provided.
Datakonsistens90/100

Key fields such as title, reference, organization, estimated value, and deadlines are populated logically. There are no reported disputes or suspensions. The contract start date aligns with the submission deadline, which is a common practice but could be tighter for practical reasons.

Bærekraft50/100

The tender does not explicitly mention any green procurement, social aspects, innovation focus, or EU funding. This indicates a lack of emphasis on sustainability criteria within the procurement process.

Not green procurement.
No social criteria.

Styrker

Detailed and comprehensive scope of works.
Clear identification of organization and reference number.
Substantial estimated contract value disclosed.
Competitive flexible procedure indicated.

Bekymringer

Lack of specified evaluation criteria.
No content available for tender documents.
Absence of e-submission details.
No explicit sustainability considerations.

Anbefalinger

1. Provide clear and detailed evaluation criteria to ensure transparency.
2. Make the content of all tender documents fully accessible.
3. Specify the e-submission process and any associated platforms.

Forhåndsvisning av AI-score

Registrer deg for å se komplette krav og analyser

Fullstendig analyse av kvalitetsresultat
Detaljert nedbrytning av delresultater
Innsikt i styrker og bekymringer
Strategiske anbefalinger

Ingen kredittkort kreves • Oppsett på 2 minutter

Legg til i pipeline