Ønsker du å legge inn bud på offentlige anbud? Se vår TaaS-tjeneste for anbudsklargjøring
Anbud

Kjøp av et samarbeidende robotkompleks

Åpen
Frist
4 dager igjen
april 20, 2026
Kontraktsdetaljer
Kategori
Varer
Referanse
307784
Verdi
€100,000
Sted
Estonia, Estland
Publisert
mars 23, 2026
CPV-kode
Evalueringskriterier
Collaborative robot complex100%
Prosjektets tidslinje

Anbud publisert

mars 23, 2026

Frist for spørsmål

april 13, 2026

Frist for innlevering

april 20, 2026

Anbudsåpning

april 20, 2026

VinnersjansePRO
🔒
Oppgrader til Professional
Se din estimerte vinnersjanse basert på historiske data.
Oppgrader til Professional →
KjøperinnsiktPRO
🔒
Lås opp kjøperinnsikt
Se forbruksmønstre, foretrukne prosedyrer og mer.
Oppgrader til Professional →
SektorinnsiktPRO
🔒
Lås opp sektorinnsikt
Se gjennomsnittlige vinnerpriser, konkurransenivåer og markedstrender.
Oppgrader til Professional →
Budsjett
€100,000
Varighet
4 måneder
Sted
Estonia
Type
Varer
75
Kvalitetsscore/100
God
Markedsbenchmark
Gj.snittlig vinnerpris
€87,029
Gj.snittlig antall tilbud
2.9
Konkurranse
Lav
SMB-vinnere
96%
388 analyserte anbud

Opprinnelig anbudsbeskrivelse

Kjøp av et samarbeidende robotkompleks
EU-finansiertElektronisk innlevering

Kjør risikoanalyse

Identifiser potensielle risikoer, inkonsekvenser og varsellamper i alle anbudsunderlag. Få en detaljert risikorapport med alvorlighetsgrader og anbefalinger for risikoreduserende tiltak.

Logg inn

Vinnstrategi

AI-drevet analyse av dette anbudets krav, muligheter og utfordringer. Få strategiske innsikter for å maksimere vinnersjansene dine.

70%
Estimert vinnersjanseModerat match

This tender for a collaborative robot complex is heavily weighted on price. A winning strategy will focus on delivering the lowest possible compliant bid while ensuring a technically sound and compatible system. Demonstrating robust project management for the 4-month duration is also crucial.

Viktigste vinnermeldinger

Cost-Effective, Compliant Collaborative Robot Solution

Seamless Integration and Deployment within 4 Months

Sentrale muligheter
Price is the sole evaluation criterion, offering a clear path to maximizing score by being the lowest bidder.
The tender is not divided into lots, simplifying the bid submission and management for a single supplier.
The relatively short 4-month duration suggests a need for efficient project execution and delivery.
Sentrale utfordringer
Intense price competition due to 100% weight on cost.

Focus on lean operations, optimized supply chain, and potentially offering bundled services to reduce overall cost without compromising quality.

Ensuring absolute system and part compatibility as a single, non-divisible lot.

Thorough technical due diligence, detailed system architecture planning, and clear articulation of compatibility assurance in the technical description.

The absence of detailed mandatory exclusion grounds and specific eligibility criteria requires careful interpretation of the Hankepass/ESPD and 'Vastavustingimused'.

Thorough review of all provided tender documents, including 'Hankepass täiendatavate selgitustega' and 'Vastavustingimused', and seeking clarification from the contracting authority if any ambiguity exists.

Ideell leverandørprofil
A supplier with a proven track record in providing collaborative robot systems, capable of offering competitive pricing and possessing strong technical expertise to ensure system compatibility. They should also have efficient project management capabilities to deliver within the 4-month timeframe.
Sentrale krav
Technical description of the collaborative robot complex, ensuring system and part compatibility.
Lowest bid price for the collaborative robot complex, including delivery, installation, and training.
Confirmation of meeting contracting authority's conditions and qualification requirements (via Hankepass/ESPD).
Confirmation of compliance with sanctions.
Indication of business secrets.
Viktigste differensiatorer
The most aggressive and sustainable pricing strategy that still allows for profitable delivery.
A highly detailed and convincing technical description that explicitly addresses system and part compatibility, potentially including case studies of similar integrated systems.
Demonstrated ability to deliver within the tight 4-month timeframe, perhaps through a clear project plan and resource allocation.
Muligheter for samfunnsverdi
While social value is not explicitly required, a bidder could subtly weave in commitments to local employment or sustainable logistics for delivery as part of their overall project execution narrative, if feasible without impacting cost.
Fokusområder for anbud
Collaborative robot complex (Cost)100.0%

Aggressively price the entire package (robot, delivery, installation, training) to be the lowest. Conduct thorough cost analysis to identify all cost drivers and optimize for the lowest possible compliant bid. Ensure all ancillary costs are clearly itemized and competitive.

Anbefalinger6
Aggressively Price for Lowest Bid
KritiskMye arbeid

Given the 100% weight on cost, the primary focus must be on submitting the lowest possible compliant bid. This requires meticulous cost breakdown, supply chain optimization, and potentially leveraging existing stock or favorable supplier agreements. Ensure all included components (delivery, installation, training) are priced competitively.

Directly maximizes score for the sole evaluation criterion.
Provide Comprehensive Technical Description with Compatibility Assurance
KritiskMiddels arbeid

Submit a detailed technical description of the collaborative robot complex. Crucially, explicitly address and demonstrate how all system components and parts are compatible. This could involve detailed schematics, interface specifications, or a statement of guaranteed interoperability.

Meets a critical technical requirement and mitigates risk of rejection.
Thoroughly Complete Hankepass/ESPD and Declarations
KritiskMiddels arbeid

Ensure the Hankepass (ESPD) and any other required declarations (e.g., sanctions compliance) are completed accurately and comprehensively. As the Hankepass is a self-declaration, ensure internal processes are robust to confirm all stated qualifications and conditions are met.

Essential for eligibility and avoiding exclusion.
Develop a Clear 4-Month Project Execution Plan
HøyMiddels arbeid

Outline a realistic and efficient project plan demonstrating the ability to deliver the entire complex, including installation and training, within the 4-month timeframe. This plan should highlight key milestones and resource allocation.

Builds confidence in delivery capability and addresses the short duration.
Seek Clarification on Ambiguities
HøyLite arbeid

Review all tender documents, especially 'Hankepass täiendatavate selgitustega' and 'Vastavustingimused', for any potential ambiguities regarding eligibility, technical requirements, or submission formats. Proactively seek clarification from the contracting authority to avoid misinterpretation.

Reduces risk of non-compliance and bid rejection.
Highlight Proven Integration Expertise
MediumLite arbeid

If possible, subtly highlight past experience in integrating complex robotic systems or providing end-to-end solutions. This can add value beyond just the price, demonstrating a higher level of technical competence.

Adds a layer of technical credibility beyond pure price.
Konkurranseposisjonering
Position as the most cost-effective provider of a fully integrated and compatible collaborative robot system, emphasizing efficient delivery within the specified timeframe. Highlight the simplicity of dealing with a single supplier for all aspects of the contract.

Konkurrenter

Oppgrader for å se hvilke selskaper som sannsynligvis vil legge inn tilbud på dette anbudet, basert på historiske anskaffelsesdata.

Logg inn

Krav og kvalifikasjoner

12 krav på tvers av 5 kategorier

Innlevering (6)
Obligatorisk (1)
Overholdelse (1)
Teknisk (2)
Finansiell (2)
SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS6
--The tender is not divided into lots because the lots form a complete system, and dividing it into lots is not practical to ensure system and part compatibility.
--The bidder must confirm compliance with sanctions.
--If applicable, a power of attorney for joint bidders must be submitted.
MANDATORY EXCLUSION GROUNDS1
--No specific mandatory exclusion grounds are detailed in the provided text.
ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS1
--The bidder must provide a confirmation of meeting the contracting authority's conditions and qualification requirements, which is initially evidenced by the bidder's own confirmation, but is not filled out directly.
TECHNICAL CAPABILITY REQUIREMENTS2
--The bidder must submit a technical description of the collaborative robot complex.
--The system and its parts must be compatible.
FINANCIAL REQUIREMENTS2
--The tender is for a collaborative robot complex with a value of 100,000.0 EUR.
--The cost of the collaborative robot complex will be evaluated, with the lowest bid receiving maximum points.

Forhåndsvisning av krav

Registrer deg for å se komplette krav og analyser

Dokumenter

4 dokumenter tilgjengelig med AI-sammendrag

VastavustingimusedPDF
307784_vastavustingimused.pdf -- 9.3 KB

The bidder must submit a technical description, confirm compliance with sanctions, and provide a power of attorney for joint bidders if applicable, while also identifying trade secrets.

Vis
Hindamiskriteeriumid ja hinnatavad näitajadPDF
307784_hindamiskriteeriumid.pdf -- 3.0 KB

The tender evaluates the cost of the collaborative robot complex, where the lowest bid receives the maximum points.

Vis
Hankepass täiendatavate selgitustegaPDF
307784_hankepass_taiendavate_selgitustega.pdf -- 62.9 KB

The 'Hankepass' (ESPD) is a self-declaration by the economic operator serving as preliminary evidence of meeting the contracting authority's conditions and qualification requirements, but it is not filled out directly.

Vis
HankedokumendidSIG
307784_HD.asice -- 1.9 MB

Ingen sammendrag tilgjengelig for dette dokumentet.

Vis

Forhåndsvisning av dokumenter

Registrer deg for å se dokumentoppsummeringer og analyser

75
God

Anbudskvalitetsscore

This tender for a collaborative robot complex is generally well-structured with clear financial and timeline information. However, it lacks specific details on exclusion and eligibility grounds, and sustainability aspects are minimal.

Poengfordeling

Juridisk samsvar75/100

The tender adheres to general legal compliance by providing a clear procedure, CPV code, and a reasonable submission deadline. The absence of reported disputes and the presence of EU funding contribute positively. However, the lack of explicit mandatory exclusion grounds and detailed eligibility criteria could be improved.

Lack of specific mandatory exclusion grounds detailed.
Eligibility requirements are vaguely described as a self-declaration without specific criteria.
Klarhet80/100

The description of the collaborative robot complex is concise. Requirements for technical capability (technical description, compatibility) and financial aspects (cost evaluation) are present. The evaluation criteria are stated as relative weighting, which is a good indicator of clarity.

Fullstendighet70/100

Basic information such as title, reference, organization, estimated value, and deadlines are present. The contract duration is specified. However, the AI could not fully analyze all attached documents due to format, potentially missing crucial details. The 'Hankepass' is noted as not being filled out directly, which might indicate missing information for bidders.

AI could not fully analyze all attached documents (.xml, .asice formats).
The 'Hankepass' is described as not being filled out directly, suggesting potential ambiguity for bidders.
Rettferdighet85/100

The tender is conducted via e-procurement with electronic submission, promoting accessibility. The estimated value is disclosed, and the evaluation criterion (lowest bid gets maximum points) is objective. The deadline is reasonable. There are no apparent requirements tailored to specific companies.

Praktisk gjennomførbarhet65/100

Electronic submission and e-procurement are positive aspects. The contract duration is specified. However, the contract start date is not explicitly mentioned, and financing information is limited to the EU funding characteristic. The tender validity period is provided.

Contract start date is not explicitly mentioned.
Financing information is limited to 'EU Funded'.
Datakonsistens90/100

Key fields such as title, reference, organization, value, and deadlines are populated. There are no reported disputes or suspensions. The dates provided (Reveal, Submission, Opening) are logically sequenced.

Bærekraft50/100

The tender is marked as 'EU Funded', which implies adherence to certain EU standards. However, there are no specific mentions of green procurement, social aspects, or innovation within the provided text, limiting the sustainability score.

No specific green procurement criteria mentioned.
No explicit social or innovation aspects are detailed.

Styrker

Clear financial and timeline information.
Electronic submission and e-procurement.
Objective evaluation criterion (lowest bid).
EU Funded characteristic.

Bekymringer

Lack of specific mandatory exclusion grounds.
Vague eligibility requirements.
Limited sustainability considerations.

Anbefalinger

1. Provide specific mandatory exclusion grounds.
2. Clarify eligibility requirements with concrete criteria.
3. Incorporate specific green or social procurement objectives.

Forhåndsvisning av AI-score

Registrer deg for å se komplette krav og analyser

Fullstendig analyse av kvalitetsresultat
Detaljert nedbrytning av delresultater
Innsikt i styrker og bekymringer
Strategiske anbefalinger

Ingen kredittkort kreves • Oppsett på 2 minutter

Legg til i pipeline