Ønsker du å legge inn bud på offentlige anbud? Se vår TaaS-tjeneste for anbudsklargjøring
Anbud

Augmentasjoner for utskifting av hofteleddsdeformiteter

Åpen
Frist
6 dager igjen
april 21, 2026
Kontraktsdetaljer
Kategori
Varer
Referanse
307722
Verdi
€260,000
Sted
Estonia, Estland
Publisert
mars 18, 2026
CPV-kode
Evalueringskriterier
Mark the total cost of the implant for restoring one volume.100%
Prosjektets tidslinje

Anbud publisert

mars 18, 2026

Frist for spørsmål

april 14, 2026

Frist for innlevering

april 21, 2026

Anbudsåpning

april 21, 2026

Kontraktens startdato

mai 17, 2026

VinnersjansePRO
🔒
Oppgrader til Professional
Se din estimerte vinnersjanse basert på historiske data.
Oppgrader til Professional →
KjøperinnsiktPRO
🔒
Lås opp kjøperinnsikt
Se forbruksmønstre, foretrukne prosedyrer og mer.
Oppgrader til Professional →
SektorinnsiktPRO
🔒
Lås opp sektorinnsikt
Se gjennomsnittlige vinnerpriser, konkurransenivåer og markedstrender.
Oppgrader til Professional →
Budsjett
€260,000
Varighet
36 måneder
Sted
Estonia
Type
Varer
75
Kvalitetsscore/100
God
Markedsbenchmark
Gj.snittlig vinnerpris
€92,792
Gj.snittlig antall tilbud
2.2
Konkurranse
Lav
SMB-vinnere
86%
3,220 analyserte anbud

Opprinnelig anbudsbeskrivelse

Formålet med denne anskaffelsen er å inngå en rammeavtale for kjøp av augmentasjoner som er nødvendige for utskifting av hofteleddsdeformiteter, sammen med levering av instrumenter som er nødvendige for implantasjon av augmentasjonene, eller inntil den maksimale kostnaden er nådd, avhengig av hvilken betingelse som inntreffer først.
Elektronisk innlevering

Kjør risikoanalyse

Identifiser potensielle risikoer, inkonsekvenser og varsellamper i alle anbudsunderlag. Få en detaljert risikorapport med alvorlighetsgrader og anbefalinger for risikoreduserende tiltak.

Logg inn

Vinnstrategi

AI-drevet analyse av dette anbudets krav, muligheter og utfordringer. Få strategiske innsikter for å maksimere vinnersjansene dine.

60%
Estimert vinnersjanseModerat match

This tender for hip joint augmentations is a pure price-driven competition. Success hinges on offering the absolute lowest cost per implant while rigorously meeting all technical and compliance requirements. Bidders must leverage efficient supply chains and lean operations to achieve a winning price point.

Viktigste vinnermeldinger

Unbeatable Value: Delivering the lowest cost per implant without compromising quality.

Reliable Supply: Ensuring consistent availability of high-quality augmentations and instruments.

Seamless Integration: Providing instruments that perfectly complement the augmentations for efficient surgical procedures.

Sentrale muligheter
Leverage economies of scale in manufacturing and procurement to drive down unit costs.
Optimize instrument provision strategy – either through competitive pricing or demonstrating superior value/efficiency.
Streamline supply chain and logistics to minimize overheads and delivery costs.
Sentrale utfordringer
Intense price competition due to the 100% cost evaluation criterion.

Conduct thorough cost analysis to identify all cost-saving opportunities in manufacturing, sourcing, and logistics. Explore potential for long-term supplier agreements for raw materials.

Ensuring strict compliance with all mandatory exclusion grounds, particularly regarding Russian Federation connections.

Implement robust due diligence processes for all suppliers and subcontractors. Obtain explicit declarations of non-affiliation with Russian entities.

Meeting detailed technical specifications in Annex 1 while maintaining a low price.

Thoroughly review Annex 1 and ensure product development or sourcing aligns with these requirements. If modifications are needed, assess cost implications carefully.

Ideell leverandørprofil
A well-established medical device supplier with a strong track record in orthopedic implants, possessing a highly optimized manufacturing and distribution network. The ideal bidder will have a deep understanding of cost drivers for augmentations and instruments, and the ability to offer competitive pricing without compromising quality or compliance.
Sentrale krav
Compliance with technical specifications for implants, components, and instruments (Annex 1)
Submission of Hankepass (procurement pass) and completed Form II
Absence of subcontractors or suppliers connected to the Russian Federation
Lowest total cost of the implant for restoring one volume
Viktigste differensiatorer
Demonstrably superior cost-efficiency in production and supply chain management, allowing for a significantly lower price point than competitors.
A proven track record of delivering high-volume orthopedic implants with consistent quality and reliability.
A highly efficient and integrated instrument offering that demonstrably reduces surgical time or complexity, even if not explicitly evaluated, it can be a subtle differentiator.
Muligheter for samfunnsverdi
While the tender explicitly states 'No' for social aspects, a bidder could proactively highlight any existing internal initiatives that align with broader societal benefits, such as waste reduction in manufacturing or employee training programs, framing them as contributing to operational efficiency and long-term sustainability.
Fokusområder for anbud
Total cost of the implant for restoring one volume100.0%

Achieve the absolute lowest possible price per implant. This requires meticulous cost engineering, efficient sourcing, optimized manufacturing processes, and lean logistics. Every cost component must be scrutinized for reduction opportunities.

Anbefalinger6
Price Optimization is Paramount
KritiskMye arbeid

Given the 100% cost evaluation, the primary focus must be on achieving the lowest possible price per implant. Conduct a granular cost breakdown of all components, manufacturing, and logistics. Explore all avenues for cost reduction without compromising quality or compliance.

Directly determines the bid's score and competitiveness.
Rigorous Technical Compliance
KritiskMye arbeid

Thoroughly analyze Annex 1 for all technical specifications of implants, components, and instruments. Ensure all proposed products precisely meet these requirements. Any deviation will lead to disqualification.

Ensures eligibility and avoids disqualification.
Strict Exclusion Ground Adherence
KritiskMiddels arbeid

Implement stringent checks to ensure no subcontractors or suppliers are connected to the Russian Federation. This requires robust due diligence and clear contractual clauses.

Avoids mandatory exclusion and disqualification.
Optimize Instrument Provision Strategy
HøyMiddels arbeid

Evaluate the cost-effectiveness of providing instruments. If offering them as part of the package, ensure their cost is competitive or that their value proposition (e.g., efficiency in surgery) is clearly articulated, even if not directly scored.

Contributes to the overall cost-effectiveness and can be a subtle differentiator.
Streamline Supply Chain and Logistics
HøyMiddels arbeid

Focus on efficient inventory management, warehousing, and transportation to minimize overheads and delivery times. This directly impacts the final cost per implant.

Reduces overall bid cost and improves delivery reliability.
Highlight Operational Efficiency
MediumLite arbeid

While price is king, subtly highlight operational efficiencies in manufacturing, quality control, and logistics that enable the low price. This builds confidence in the bidder's ability to sustain the offering.

Builds trust and reinforces the value proposition.
Konkurranseposisjonering
Position as the most cost-effective provider of high-quality hip augmentations. Emphasize lean operations and supply chain mastery that enables the lowest price. Highlight reliability and adherence to all technical specifications to build trust despite the price-centric evaluation.

Konkurrenter

Oppgrader for å se hvilke selskaper som sannsynligvis vil legge inn tilbud på dette anbudet, basert på historiske anskaffelsesdata.

Logg inn

Krav og kvalifikasjoner

9 krav på tvers av 5 kategorier

Innlevering (3)
Obligatorisk (1)
Overholdelse (3)
Teknisk (1)
Finansiell (1)
SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS3
--The tender is not divided into lots because it concerns functionally interacting products of different shapes and sizes.
--Bidders must submit a tender for the procurement of augmentations and instruments necessary for the replacement of hip joint deformities, explaining the purpose of the tender, technical requirements, and conditions for submitting a bid.
--The framework agreement regulates the sale of augmentations necessary for the replacement of hip joint deformities between Tartu University Hospital and the supplier, defining the terms of the agreement, product requirements, and the obligations of the parties.
MANDATORY EXCLUSION GROUNDS1
--Bidders shall not involve subcontractors or suppliers connected to the Russian Federation.
ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS3
--Bidders must submit an application to participate in the procurement procedure according to the provided Form II, entering their company data.
--Joint bidders must submit a power of attorney.
--The "Hankepass" (procurement pass) is an initial confirmation of the company itself, necessary for participation in the procurement procedure, and contains conditions set by the contracting authority.
TECHNICAL CAPABILITY REQUIREMENTS1
--Bidders must submit a tender that complies with the technical specifications, including implants, components, and instruments for the replacement of hip joint deformities, according to the detailed requirements provided in Annex 1.
FINANCIAL REQUIREMENTS1
--The cost of the bid is the sole evaluation criterion, where the lowest price receives the maximum score.

Forhåndsvisning av krav

Registrer deg for å se komplette krav og analyser

Dokumenter

8 dokumenter tilgjengelig med AI-sammendrag

VastavustingimusedPDF
307722_vastavustingimused.pdf -- 13.8 KB

The bidder must confirm that subcontractors or suppliers linked to the Russian Federation will not be involved in the contract execution, and joint bidders must submit a power of attorney.

Vis
Pakkuja esitab tehnilistele tingimustele vastava pakkumuse vastavalt Lisale 1 Wo...DOC
Lisa_1_tehnilised_tingimused.docx -- 18.9 KB

Bidders must submit a bid compliant with the technical specifications, including implants, components, and instruments for hip joint deformity replacement as per the detailed requirements in Appendix 1.

Vis
Pakkuja esitab hankemenetluses osalemise avalduse vastavalt Lisa 3 vormile IIDOC
Lisa_3_vorm_II.docx -- 31.7 KB

The bidder must submit an application to participate in the procurement procedure according to the provided Form II, entering their company details.

Vis
Hindamiskriteeriumid ja hinnatavad näitajadPDF
307722_hindamiskriteeriumid.pdf -- 2.8 KB

The bid price is the sole evaluation criterion, where the lowest price receives the maximum score.

Vis
Hankepass täiendatavate selgitustegaPDF
307722_hankepass_taiendavate_selgitustega.pdf -- 66.7 KB

The Tender Pass is an initial self-declaration by the economic operator, required for participation in the procurement procedure, and includes conditions set by the contracting authority.

Vis
Juhised pakkujalePDF
Juhised pakkujale.pdf -- 189.8 KB

This document provides instructions for bidders participating in the procurement of augmentations for hip socket deformities, clarifying the tender's objective, technical requirements, and submission conditions.

Vis
Ühispakkujate volikiriDOC
Lisa_3_vorm_I.docx -- 31.8 KB

A joint bidder authorization is a document that empowers one joint bidder to represent the others in the procurement procedure.

Vis
RaamlepingPDF
Raamleping.pdf -- 195.7 KB

This framework agreement governs the sale of augmentations for hip joint deformities between Tartu University Hospital and the supplier, outlining contract terms, product requirements, and party obligations.

Vis

Forhåndsvisning av dokumenter

Registrer deg for å se dokumentoppsummeringer og analyser

75
God

Anbudskvalitetsscore

This tender for hip joint deformity augmentations is generally well-structured with clear technical requirements and a straightforward evaluation criterion. However, it lacks explicit sustainability considerations and has some minor practical limitations regarding document accessibility.

Poengfordeling

Juridisk samsvar75/100

The tender appears to comply with general procurement regulations, including the use of a proper CPV code and a clear procedure. Deadlines are reasonable. No disputes are noted. The procedure type 'A' is standard.

Klarhet80/100

The description of the procurement's objective is clear, and technical requirements are detailed in Annex 1. The evaluation criterion (lowest price) is explicitly stated. Conditions for participation are documented.

Fullstendighet70/100

Most basic information is present, including estimated value, duration, and contract start date. However, the specific financing source is not explicitly detailed, and the 'Hankepass' in international format (ESPD) is not AI-analyzable, potentially hindering full document completeness assessment.

Rettferdighet85/100

The tender is open to e-submission and e-procurement, promoting fairness. The evaluation criterion is objective (lowest price). The exclusion of bidders connected to the Russian Federation is a specific requirement, but not necessarily unfair if justified by geopolitical context. The 'Max Participants: 1' is unusual and could be a point of concern if it implies a pre-selected supplier, though it might refer to the number of framework agreements.

Praktisk gjennomførbarhet65/100

E-submission is mandated. The contract start date is specified. However, the URL for the opening place is provided, but direct links to all required documents within the tender notice itself are not immediately apparent, requiring navigation through the e-procurement portal. The financing information is not detailed.

Datakonsistens90/100

Key fields such as title, reference, organization, value, and dates are populated logically. There are no reported suspensions or disputes. The timeline is consistent.

Bærekraft50/100

There is no explicit mention of green procurement, social aspects, or innovation. The tender is not indicated as EU-funded, which often encourages sustainability criteria.

Styrker

Clear technical specifications in Annex 1
Objective evaluation criterion (lowest price)
Mandatory e-submission and e-procurement
Well-defined basic tender information

Bekymringer

Lack of explicit sustainability criteria
Ambiguity regarding 'Max Participants: 1'
Potential difficulty in accessing all required documents directly

Anbefalinger

1. Clarify the 'Max Participants: 1' criterion.
2. Consider incorporating sustainability criteria into future tenders.
3. Ensure direct links to all essential tender documents are provided within the notice.

Forhåndsvisning av AI-score

Registrer deg for å se komplette krav og analyser

Fullstendig analyse av kvalitetsresultat
Detaljert nedbrytning av delresultater
Innsikt i styrker og bekymringer
Strategiske anbefalinger

Ingen kredittkort kreves • Oppsett på 2 minutter

Ny tjeneste

Ønsker du at vi håndterer denne anbudskonkurransen?

Våre innkjøpseksperter forbereder alt. Du gjennomgår, godkjenner og sender inn.

~1hDin tid
80%+80 %+
$0På forhånd
Se full sammenligning
Uten TaaSMed TaaS
40-80 timer
Forberedelsestid
~1 time
Din tid
15-25 %
Gjennomsnittlig vinnerate
80 %+
Vinnerprosent
Risiko for feil
Manuell gjennomgang
Ekspert QA
Samsvarskontroll
Du gjør alt
Håndterer alt
Vi gjør alt
Heldekkende tjeneste
La oss vinne dette anbudet
Betal kun når du vinner · 400+ selskaper stoler på oss
Eller gjør det selv

Legg til i pipeline