Ønsker du å legge inn bud på offentlige anbud? Se vår TaaS-tjeneste for anbudsklargjøring
Anbud

Prosjektering og bygging av drivhus

Åpen
Frist
7 dager igjen
april 22, 2026
Kontraktsdetaljer
Kategori
Bygg og anlegg
Referanse
307610
Verdi
€250,000
Sted
Estonia, Estland
Publisert
mars 27, 2026
CPV-kode
Evalueringskriterier
Total bid cost100%
Prosjektets tidslinje

Anbud publisert

mars 27, 2026

Frist for spørsmål

april 15, 2026

Frist for innlevering

april 22, 2026

Anbudsåpning

april 22, 2026

Kontraktens startdato

mai 10, 2026

VinnersjansePRO
🔒
Oppgrader til Professional
Se din estimerte vinnersjanse basert på historiske data.
Oppgrader til Professional →
KjøperinnsiktPRO
🔒
Lås opp kjøperinnsikt
Se forbruksmønstre, foretrukne prosedyrer og mer.
Oppgrader til Professional →
SektorinnsiktPRO
🔒
Lås opp sektorinnsikt
Se gjennomsnittlige vinnerpriser, konkurransenivåer og markedstrender.
Oppgrader til Professional →
Budsjett
€250,000
Varighet
Ikke spesifisert
Sted
Estonia
Type
Bygg og anlegg
75
Kvalitetsscore/100
God
Markedsbenchmark
Gj.snittlig vinnerpris
€524,963
Gj.snittlig antall tilbud
4.7
Konkurranse
Medium
SMB-vinnere
94%
5,932 analyserte anbud

Opprinnelig anbudsbeskrivelse

Prosjektere og bygge ett drivhus med minimumsmål på 25 x 53 meter, inkludert nødvendige eksterne nett for service, ved RMK Kullenga planteskolen (Lääne-Viru fylke, Tapa kommune, Porkuni bygd, Porkuni skog 65, gårdsnummer 78701:004:0640), i henhold til teknisk spesifikasjon og skisse.
Elektronisk innlevering

Kjør risikoanalyse

Identifiser potensielle risikoer, inkonsekvenser og varsellamper i alle anbudsunderlag. Få en detaljert risikorapport med alvorlighetsgrader og anbefalinger for risikoreduserende tiltak.

Logg inn

Vinnstrategi

AI-drevet analyse av dette anbudets krav, muligheter og utfordringer. Få strategiske innsikter for å maksimere vinnersjansene dine.

70%
Estimert vinnersjanseModerat match

This tender for the design and construction of a greenhouse at RMK Kullenga nursery presents a clear opportunity for a technically competent bidder focused on cost-efficiency. The primary evaluation driver is price, necessitating a lean, optimized bid. Key to success will be demonstrating a streamlined design and construction process that minimizes costs while adhering strictly to technical specifications and deadlines.

Viktigste vinnermeldinger

Cost-Effective Design and Construction Excellence

Guaranteed On-Time Delivery and Compliance

Streamlined Project Execution without Subcontractors

Sentrale muligheter
The explicit emphasis on the lowest price receiving maximum score is a significant opportunity for cost-focused bidders.
The prohibition of subcontractors simplifies the bid and reduces potential coordination risks, allowing a single entity to control costs and timelines.
The clear construction and occupancy permit deadlines provide a defined scope for project planning and resource allocation.
Sentrale utfordringer
The absence of specified evaluation criteria beyond price means that price will be the sole determinant of success, potentially leading to aggressive bidding.

Develop a highly accurate cost model that accounts for all design, material, labor, and permitting costs, while ensuring profitability. Explore efficiencies in material sourcing and construction methods to achieve the lowest possible price without compromising quality or compliance.

The requirement for bidders to obtain permits and connect external networks can be time-consuming and subject to external delays.

Proactively engage with local authorities and utility providers during the bid preparation phase to understand permit timelines and connection processes. Build buffer time into the project schedule for these activities and clearly outline the proposed approach in the bid.

The tender is for a single, integrated project, requiring a bidder with comprehensive design and construction capabilities.

Ensure the bid team has all necessary in-house expertise for both design and construction, or clearly demonstrate how integrated project management will be achieved. Highlight past experience in delivering similar end-to-end projects.

Ideell leverandørprofil
An experienced construction company with a proven track record in designing and building specialized agricultural or horticultural structures. The ideal bidder will have strong project management capabilities, efficient supply chain management, and a deep understanding of cost optimization in construction, particularly within the Estonian context. They should also have a robust process for obtaining permits and managing external network connections.
Sentrale krav
Design and construction of a greenhouse (min. 25 x 53 meters) with external network connections.
Demolition work included in the scope.
Obtaining necessary permits.
Adherence to construction deadline (16.10.2026) and occupancy permit deadline (30.11.2026).
Submission of a Hankepass (ESPD) electronically.
Confirmation of site visit.
No subcontractors allowed.
Viktigste differensiatorer
Demonstrated ability to deliver projects within tight cost constraints while maintaining high quality.
A clear, efficient, and well-documented plan for permit acquisition and external network connections.
A highly optimized design that meets functional requirements with minimal material and construction complexity.
Muligheter for samfunnsverdi
While not explicitly required, consider a commitment to using locally sourced materials where feasible to support the local economy, and to implement waste reduction strategies during construction.
Fokusområder for anbud
PriceMaximum Score

Conduct a thorough cost analysis, identify all direct and indirect costs, and optimize the design for cost-efficiency. Benchmark against similar projects to ensure competitiveness while maintaining a healthy profit margin. Consider bulk purchasing of materials and efficient construction methodologies.

Anbefalinger5
Thorough Site Visit and Technical Specification Review
KritiskMiddels arbeid

Conduct a mandatory site visit and meticulously review the technical specification and sketch drawings. Understand the existing site conditions, potential challenges for demolition, and the exact requirements for external network connections. This will inform a more accurate and competitive cost estimate.

Ensures accurate pricing, identification of potential risks, and a bid that fully meets technical requirements.
Price Optimization Strategy
KritiskMye arbeid

Given that price is the primary evaluation criterion, develop a lean and cost-effective design and construction plan. Focus on material efficiency, streamlined construction processes, and minimizing labor hours. Explore innovative but proven construction techniques that reduce overall cost.

Maximizes score for the price criterion, significantly increasing win probability.
Proactive Permit and Network Connection Planning
HøyMiddels arbeid

Investigate the permit acquisition process and external network connection requirements early. Engage with relevant authorities and utility providers to understand timelines, procedures, and potential costs. Incorporate realistic timelines for these activities into the project schedule.

Reduces risk of delays and cost overruns related to external dependencies.
Demonstrate Integrated Project Management Expertise
MediumLite arbeid

Highlight the company's capability to manage the entire project lifecycle from design to construction, including all permitting and network connections, without subcontractors. Emphasize internal expertise and robust project management systems.

Builds confidence in the contracting authority regarding the bidder's ability to deliver efficiently and on time.
Accurate Hankepass (ESPD) Completion
KritiskLite arbeid

Ensure the Hankepass (ESPD) is completed accurately and electronically, providing all necessary self-declarations. Pay close attention to any specific instructions or clarifications provided in 'Hankepass täiendatavate selgitustega'.

Avoids disqualification due to administrative errors.
Konkurranseposisjonering
Position the bid as the most cost-effective solution that guarantees timely delivery and full compliance with all technical requirements, leveraging the absence of subcontractors as a strength for streamlined execution.

Konkurrenter

Oppgrader for å se hvilke selskaper som sannsynligvis vil legge inn tilbud på dette anbudet, basert på historiske anskaffelsesdata.

Logg inn

Krav og kvalifikasjoner

25 krav på tvers av 5 kategorier

Innlevering (11)
Obligatorisk (1)
Overholdelse (4)
Teknisk (6)
Finansiell (3)
SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS11
--The tender is for a single, integrated construction project.
--The contracting authority has the right to change the expected contract award date.
--The contracting authority has the right to award the contract earlier than expected.
MANDATORY EXCLUSION GROUNDS1
--Bidders must not have criminal convictions for fraud, money laundering, or terrorist financing.
ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS4
--Bidders must confirm site visit.
--If submitting a joint bid, a power of attorney for joint bidders must be submitted.
--Bidders must define business secrets.
TECHNICAL CAPABILITY REQUIREMENTS6
--The project involves the design and construction of a covered seed greenhouse.
--Scope includes demolition work.
--Scope includes obtaining permits.
FINANCIAL REQUIREMENTS3
--The total cost of the bid will be evaluated.
--The lowest price will receive the maximum score.
--The estimated value of the tender is 250,000.0 EUR.

Forhåndsvisning av krav

Registrer deg for å se komplette krav og analyser

Dokumenter

9 dokumenter tilgjengelig med AI-sammendrag

Alltöövõtjate kontrollimise tingimused lepingu täitmise etapisPDF
307610_alltoovotjate_kontrollimise_tingimused... -- 41.1 KB

The contracting authority will check subcontractors' backgrounds regarding criminal convictions for fraud, money laundering, or terrorist financing, requiring relevant explanations and proof of reliability.

Vis
VastavustingimusedPDF
307610_vastavustingimused.pdf -- 8.1 KB

Bidders must confirm site visit, submit power of attorney for joint bids, define trade secrets, and confirm non-engagement of subcontractors to ensure their bid complies with tender conditions.

Vis
Hindamiskriteeriumid ja hinnatavad näitajadPDF
307610_hindamiskriteeriumid.pdf -- 4.1 KB

The tender evaluates the total bid cost, where the lowest price receives the maximum score, covering design and construction works.

Vis
Hankepass täiendatavate selgitustegaPDF
307610_hankepass_taiendavate_selgitustega.pdf -- 72.4 KB

The Procurement Pass (ESPD) is a self-declaration by the economic operator, serving as preliminary evidence instead of certificates issued by authorities or third parties, and is filled out electronically.

Vis
Tehnilise kirjelduse lisa- Fotod olemasolevast olukorrastZIP
Fotod.zip -- 62.2 MB

Ingen sammendrag tilgjengelig for dette dokumentet.

Vis
HankedokumentDOC
HD_307610_3700.docx -- 60.1 KB

The State Forest Management Centre is seeking bids for the design and construction of a greenhouse for seedling production, with a completion deadline of 16.10.2026 and occupancy permit by 30.11.2026.

Vis
Ühispakkujate volikiri ja kinnitusDOC
HD Lisa 1, vorm 1 - Ühispakkujate volikiri (3... -- 35.5 KB

This document is a joint bidder authorization and confirmation, required for tender submission.

Vis
Tehniline kirjeldusDOC
Lisa 1 - Tehniline kirjeldus.docx -- 248.2 KB

The tender seeks proposals for the design and construction of a covering seedling greenhouse, including demolition, permit acquisition, and external network connections.

Vis
Hankelepingu vormDOC
Lisa 2- Hankelepingu vorm_307610_3700.docx -- 51.8 KB

The tender contract form defines the terms, parties, contract object, and general provisions for design and construction works, including insurance requirements and deadlines.

Vis

Forhåndsvisning av dokumenter

Registrer deg for å se dokumentoppsummeringer og analyser

75
God

Anbudskvalitetsscore

This tender for greenhouse design and construction is generally well-structured, with clear technical requirements and a reasonable process. However, it lacks explicit sustainability considerations and some practical aspects of e-submission could be improved.

Poengfordeling

Juridisk samsvar75/100

The tender appears to comply with general procurement regulations, including the use of a proper CPV code and a clear procedure. Deadlines are reasonable, and no disputes are noted. The procedure is classified as 'A' (Open Procedure), which is standard.

Klarhet80/100

The description of the project is clear, detailing the scope of work for designing and constructing a greenhouse with specific dimensions and external network connections. Technical specifications and site location are well-defined. Requirements are documented.

Fullstendighet70/100

Most basic information is present, including estimated value, duration, and deadlines. However, the contract start date is presented in a format that might require interpretation. While many documents are attached, the AI could not analyze all file types.

Rettferdighet85/100

The tender offers full document access and discloses the estimated value. Criteria are objective (relative weighting, lowest price gets max score). E-procurement is utilized. There are no obvious requirements tailored to specific companies, promoting fairness.

Praktisk gjennomførbarhet65/100

E-submission is mandated, and a document URL is provided for the opening place. The contract start date is specified. Financing information is not explicitly detailed, and the duration is defined by 'PERIOD' which is standard but could be more precise in the summary.

Datakonsistens90/100

Key fields such as title, reference, organization, and deadlines are populated. There are no noted suspensions or disputes. Dates appear logically sequenced, with a reasonable gap between submission and opening.

Bærekraft50/100

The tender does not explicitly mention green procurement, social aspects, or innovation. It is not indicated as EU funded. This area is underdeveloped.

Lack of explicit green procurement criteria
Absence of social responsibility considerations

Styrker

Clear technical description and scope of work
Well-defined project location and CPV code
Use of e-procurement and electronic submission
Objective evaluation criteria (price-based weighting)

Bekymringer

Limited explicit sustainability considerations
Some practicalities of e-submission could be clearer (e.g., file format compatibility)
Financing information not explicitly detailed

Anbefalinger

1. Incorporate specific sustainability criteria (e.g., energy efficiency, material sourcing) in future tenders.
2. Ensure all attached documents are in AI-analyzable formats or provide summaries for all.
3. Provide more explicit details on financing arrangements if applicable.

Forhåndsvisning av AI-score

Registrer deg for å se komplette krav og analyser

Fullstendig analyse av kvalitetsresultat
Detaljert nedbrytning av delresultater
Innsikt i styrker og bekymringer
Strategiske anbefalinger

Ingen kredittkort kreves • Oppsett på 2 minutter

Legg til i pipeline