Hulp van een aanbestedingsexpert nodig? Bekijk onze dienst voor aanbestedingsvoorbereiding
Aanbestedingen

Construction of a PVC hall

Gesloten

Deadline voor indiening verstreken

De deadline voor het indienen van deze aanbesteding is verstreken en er worden geen aanvragen meer geaccepteerd. De onderstaande informatie wordt ter referentie bewaard.

Bekijk actieve aanbestedingen
Deadline
Verlopen
4 februari 2026
Contractdetails
Categorie
Bouw
Referentie
304707
Waarde
€66,000
Locatie
Estonia, Estland
Gepubliceerd
20 januari 2026
Organisatie
CPV-code
Projecttijdlijn

Aanbesteding gepubliceerd

20 januari 2026

Deadline voor vragen

28 januari 2026

Deadline voor inschrijving

4 februari 2026

Opening van de aanbesteding

4 februari 2026

WinstkansPRO
🔒
Upgrade naar Professional
Bekijk je geschatte winstkans op basis van historische gegevens.
Upgrade naar Professional →
SectorinzichtenPRO
🔒
Ontgrendel Sectorinzichten
Bekijk gemiddelde winnende prijzen, concurrentieniveaus en markttrends.
Upgrade naar Professional →
Budget
€66,000
Looptijd
5 maanden
Locatie
Estonia
Type
Bouw
66
Kwaliteitsscore/100
Goed
Marktbenchmark
Gem. Winnende Prijs
€524,963
Gem. Inschrijvingen
4.7
Concurrentie
Gemiddeld
MKB-winnaars
94%
5,932 geanalyseerde aanbestedingen

Originele aanbestedingsbeschrijving

Hanke objektiks on Järva maakonnas Türi vallas Roovere külas (katastritunnus 93701:002:0118) asuvale Ragn-Sells AS territooriumile PVC halli rajamine ja hankijale üleandmine vastavalt hanketingimustele. Tööde lõpptähtaeg on 30.06.2026
Elektronische indiening

Risicoanalyse uitvoeren

Identificeer potentiële risico's, inconsistenties en rode vlaggen in alle aanbestedingsdocumenten. Ontvang een gedetailleerd risicorapport met ernstniveaus en aanbevelingen voor mitigatie.

Inloggen

Winststrategie

Ontvang een AI-gestuurde winnende strategie, afgestemd op deze aanbesteding. Inclusief winstkansscore, belangrijke kansen en uitdagingen, aanbevolen focusgebieden voor de inschrijving, inzichten in concurrentiepositie en actiegerichte aanbevelingen om je kansen te maximaliseren.

Inloggen

Concurrenten

Upgrade om te zien welke bedrijven waarschijnlijk op deze aanbesteding zullen inschrijven, gebaseerd op historische inkoopgegevens.

Inloggen

Vereisten & Kwalificaties

21 vereisten over 5 categorieën

Indiening (8)
Verplicht (8)
Naleving (1)
Technisch (3)
Financieel (1)
SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS8
--The bid must include a cost structure.
--The bid must include bidder confirmations.
--The bid must include a supplier confirmation letter.
MANDATORY EXCLUSION GROUNDS8
--The tenderer must not have tax debts.
--The tenderer must not be subject to sanctions.
--The tenderer must comply with legal norms.
ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS1
--The tenderer must demonstrate economic stability.
TECHNICAL CAPABILITY REQUIREMENTS3
--The tenderer must have installed at least three halls with an area of over 500 m² within the last 36 months.
--The bid must include a technical description of the PVC hall in accordance with the requirements.
--The PVC hall must meet technical requirements, including dimensions, materials, construction, doors, ventilation, anchoring, and a preliminary electrical and lighting project.
FINANCIAL REQUIREMENTS1
--The bid must include the total cost in euros excluding VAT.

Voorbeeld van vereisten

Meld je aan om volledige vereisten en analyse te bekijken

Documenten

12 documenten beschikbaar met AI-samenvattingen

VastavustingimusedPDF
304707_vastavustingimused.pdf -- 4.3 KB

This document outlines the tender submission requirements, including bid cost structure, bidder confirmations, technical description of the PVC hall, supplier confirmation letter, subcontractor details, and bid validity.

Pakkuja kinnitused lisas 1 toodud vormilDOC
Lisa 1 Kinnituste vorm.docx -- 576.1 KB

This document is a bidder's confirmation form, requiring the bidder to acknowledge, agree to tender conditions, and state the offer price.

PVC halli Tehniline kirjeldus ja vastavus nõuetele vastavalt lisale 2DOC
Lisa 2 PVC halli tehniline kirjeldus.docx -- 1.0 MB

This document outlines the technical specifications for a PVC hall, including dimensions, materials, structural requirements, doors, ventilation, anchoring, and preliminary electrical and lighting design.

Pakkuja peab olema viimase 36 kuu jooksul enne hanke välja kuulutamist paigaldan...DOC
Lisa 3 Teostatud tööd.docx -- 572.7 KB

Bidders must have installed at least three halls, each with an area of at least 500 m², within the last 36 months and provide the relevant data on the attached form for verification.

Pakkuja poolt täidetud Tarnija kinnituskiri lisa 4 vormilDOC
Lisa 4 Tarnija kinnituskiri.docx -- 103.6 KB

Bidders must complete this supplier confirmation letter, affirming adherence to Ragn-Sells' quality, environmental, and occupational health & safety standards, providing company and service details, and attaching relevant certifications if applicable.

Hindamiskriteeriumid ja hinnatavad näitajadPDF
304707_hindamiskriteeriumid.pdf -- 2.8 KB

The tender will be evaluated solely based on the lowest total cost in euros without VAT, with the lowest bid receiving the maximum score.

Kõrvaldamise alused ja kvalifitseerimistingimusedPDF
304707_korvaldamise_alused_ja_kvalifitseerimi... -- 6.8 KB

This document details bidder exclusion grounds (e.g., tax debts, sanctions) and qualification conditions, including economic stability and the requirement to have installed at least three halls exceeding 500 m² within the last 36 months.

HankedokumentPDF
Hankedokument.pdf -- 210.8 KB

Ragn-Sells AS is inviting tenders for the design and construction of a PVC hall at the Järvamaa landfill, outlining the procurement conditions, qualification criteria, and bid compliance requirements.

Lisa 5 PVC halli rajamise töövõtulepingu projektPDF
Lisa 5 PVC halli rajamise töövõtulepingu proj... -- 210.2 KB

This document is a draft contract for the construction of a PVC hall, outlining the terms of the agreement between the client and the contractor, including the scope of work and general provisions.

Lisa 8 PVC halli asukohtIMG
Lisa 8 PVC halli asukoht.png -- 1.6 MB

Geen samenvatting beschikbaar voor dit document.

Lisa 6 Ragn-Sells Grupi äripartneri tegevusjuhisedPDF
RS Grupi äripartneri tegevusjuhised.pdf -- 200.3 KB

This document outlines Ragn-Sells' Code of Conduct for business partners, covering legal compliance, business ethics, anti-corruption, and environmental requirements to ensure a responsible and sustainable supply chain.

Lisa 7 Ragn-Sells AS töö- ja tuleohutuse, turvalisuse ning keskkonnahoiu tagamis...PDF
Territooriumidel tegutsemise töö- ja tuleohut... -- 140.3 KB

This document outlines the mandatory occupational safety, fire safety, security, and environmental protection requirements that cooperation partners must adhere to when working with Ragn-Sells AS.

Voorbeeld van documenten

Meld je aan om document samenvattingen en analyse te bekijken

66
Goed

Kwaliteitsscore aanbesteding

This tender presents a moderate quality assessment, with clear project details and comprehensive documentation, but is significantly hampered by critical inconsistencies in evaluation criteria and potentially restrictive technical requirements.

Scoreoverzicht

Wettelijke naleving75/100

The tender generally adheres to basic legal requirements, with reasonable deadlines and disclosed information. However, the use of non-standard procedure type codes ("E", "MS") for an EU-funded project introduces ambiguity regarding full compliance with specific EU public procurement directives.

•Non-standard procedure type codes for an EU-funded project.
Duidelijkheid60/100

While the project description and technical requirements are clear, there is a critical contradiction regarding the evaluation criteria. The basic information states "relative_weighting," but a key document specifies evaluation "solely based on the lowest total cost." This ambiguity significantly hinders bidder understanding.

•Contradictory evaluation criteria (relative weighting vs. lowest cost).
Volledigheid70/100

The tender provides most essential information, including project details, financial aspects, timelines, and a comprehensive set of documents. However, the inconsistency in evaluation criteria slightly detracts from the overall completeness of a fully coherent tender package.

•Inconsistency in evaluation criteria impacts overall coherence.
Eerlijkheid65/100

The tender supports e-procurement and discloses the estimated value, promoting equal access. However, the technical capability requirement for bidders to have installed "at least three halls with an area of over 500 m² within the last 36 months" is quite restrictive for a project of this estimated value, potentially limiting competition. The contradictory evaluation criteria also reduce transparency.

•Restrictive technical capability requirement (3 halls > 500m² in 36 months) for the project value.
•Contradictory evaluation criteria reduce transparency.
Praktische uitvoerbaarheid75/100

The tender is practical, supporting electronic submission and clearly defining the contract duration and financing sources. While the exact contract start date is not explicitly stated, it is inferable from the project end date and duration.

•Contract start date is inferable but not explicitly stated.
Gegevensconsistentie50/100

There are significant data inconsistencies, primarily the direct contradiction between the stated "relative_weighting" evaluation criteria and the document specifying "lowest total cost." Additionally, the tender states the value is "classified" while simultaneously disclosing it.

•Contradiction in evaluation criteria (relative weighting vs. lowest cost).
•Contradiction: value stated as 'classified' but is disclosed.
Duurzaamheid40/100

Despite being partly EU-funded, the tender does not explicitly incorporate green procurement, social aspects, or innovation criteria beyond general environmental and ethical compliance requirements for the business partner. This represents a missed opportunity to promote broader sustainability goals.

•Lack of explicit green procurement, social, or innovation criteria.

Sterke punten

Clear project description and technical specifications.
Comprehensive set of supporting documents provided.
Electronic submission and e-procurement enabled.
EU funding indicates adherence to broader principles.
Reasonable submission deadline.

Aandachtspunten

Critical contradiction in evaluation criteria (relative weighting vs. lowest cost).
Restrictive technical capability requirement (3 halls > 500m² in 36 months) for the project value.
Use of non-standard procedure type codes for an EU-funded project.
Data inconsistency regarding value classification.
Absence of explicit green, social, or innovation criteria.

Aanbevelingen

1. Immediately clarify and correct the evaluation criteria to ensure consistency and transparency for all bidders.
2. Review and justify the technical capability requirement to ensure it is proportionate to the project's scope and value, promoting wider competition.
3. Adopt standard public procurement procedure codes for EU-funded projects to enhance legal clarity and compliance.

Voorbeeld van AI-score

Meld je aan om volledige vereisten en analyse te bekijken

Volledige analyse van de kwaliteitsscore
Gedetailleerde uitsplitsing van subscores
Inzichten in sterke en zwakke punten
Strategische aanbevelingen

Geen creditcard vereist • Setup in 2 minuten