Wil je inschrijven op overheidsaanbestedingen? Bekijk onze TaaS aanbestedingsvoorbereidingsservice
Aanbestedingen

Dynamisch Inkoopsysteem (DPS) voor Ontwerp, Drukwerk en Gerelateerde Diensten

Open
Deadline
210 dagen resterend
November 16, 2026
Contractdetails
Categorie
Restricted Procedure
Referentie
032644-2022
Waarde
£700,000
Locatie
United Kingdom, Verenigd Koninkrijk
Gepubliceerd
April 13, 2026
CPV-code
Projecttijdlijn

Aanbesteding gepubliceerd

November 17, 2022

Deadline voor vragen

November 09, 2026

Deadline voor inschrijving

November 16, 2026

Buyer IntelligencePRO
🔒
Ontgrendel Buyer Intelligence
Bekijk uitgavenpatronen, voorkeursprocedures en meer.
Upgrade naar Professional →
Budget
£700,000
Looptijd
48 maanden
Locatie
United Kingdom
Type
Restricted Procedure
70
Kwaliteitsscore/100
Goed

Originele aanbestedingsbeschrijving

Dynamisch Inkoopsysteem (DPS) voor Ontwerp, Drukwerk en Gerelateerde Diensten

Risicoanalyse

Risicoanalyse is nog niet beschikbaar voor aanbestedingen uit dit land. Momenteel ondersteund: Estland, Letland, Litouwen, Polen, Frankrijk, VK, Denemarken, Nederland, Noorwegen en Finland.

Winststrategie

Ontvang een AI-gestuurde winnende strategie, afgestemd op deze aanbesteding. Inclusief winstkansscore, belangrijke kansen en uitdagingen, aanbevolen focusgebieden voor de inschrijving, inzichten in concurrentiepositie en actiegerichte aanbevelingen om je kansen te maximaliseren.

Inloggen

Concurrenten

Upgrade om te zien welke bedrijven waarschijnlijk op deze aanbesteding zullen inschrijven, gebaseerd op historische inkoopgegevens.

Inloggen

Vereisten & Kwalificaties

14 vereisten over 5 categorieën

Indiening (5)
Verplicht (1)
Naleving (3)
Technisch (4)
Financieel (1)
SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS5
--Submit the application/bid by the deadline: 2026-11-16 12:00:00.
--Adhere to the procedures for a Restricted procurement type.
--Follow the specific application process for the Dynamic Purchasing System (DPS).
MANDATORY EXCLUSION GROUNDS1
--Bidders must not be subject to any mandatory exclusion grounds as detailed in the full tender documents and relevant procurement regulations (e.g., convictions for certain offenses, bankruptcy, grave professional misconduct, non-payment of taxes).
ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS3
--Bidders must be a legal entity capable of providing design, print, and related services.
--Bidders must be eligible to participate in a Dynamic Purchasing System (DPS) as per the contracting authority's rules.
--Bidders must meet any specific eligibility criteria set by Southampton City Council in the full tender documents.
TECHNICAL CAPABILITY REQUIREMENTS4
--Bidders must demonstrate the capability to provide design services.
--Bidders must demonstrate the capability to provide print services.
--Bidders must demonstrate the capability to provide related services as defined within the DPS.
FINANCIAL REQUIREMENTS1
--Bidders must meet any minimum financial standing requirements (e.g., minimum annual turnover, financial stability) as detailed in the full tender documents.

Voorbeeld van vereisten

Meld je aan om volledige vereisten en analyse te bekijken

Documenten

3 documenten beschikbaar met AI-samenvattingen

OCDS RecordDOC
032644-2022_ocds_record.json

Geen samenvatting beschikbaar voor dit document.

OCDS Release PackageDOC
032644-2022_ocds_release.json

Geen samenvatting beschikbaar voor dit document.

Official PDF VersionPDF
032644-2022_official.pdf

This document is a contract notice for a Dynamic Purchasing System (DPS) by Southampton City Council, seeking suppliers for design, print, and related services, with an estimated value of £700,000 and divided into lots.

Voorbeeld van documenten

Meld je aan om document samenvattingen en analyse te bekijken

70
Goed

Kwaliteitsscore aanbesteding

This tender outlines a Dynamic Purchasing System (DPS) for design, print, and related services, but the provided information is critically incomplete, lacking full tender documents and detailed evaluation criteria, which severely hinders a comprehensive assessment.

Scoreoverzicht

Wettelijke naleving100/100

There is a significant inconsistency in the tender's description, stating both 'Restricted procedure' and 'Dynamic Purchasing System (DPS)'. These are distinct procurement mechanisms with different legal frameworks. The absence of full tender documents prevents verification of compliance with specific procurement regulations and the chosen procedure.

Inconsistency between 'Restricted procedure' and 'Dynamic Purchasing System' designation.
Absence of full tender documents prevents verification of legal compliance and specific procedural adherence.
Duidelijkheid40/100

The extracted requirements are high-level and broadly stated. Without the full tender documents, the specific scope of 'related services', detailed technical and financial thresholds, and the precise application process for the DPS remain unclear. This ambiguity makes it difficult for potential bidders to understand the full expectations.

Lack of detailed scope for 'related services'.
Ambiguity regarding the specific application process for the DPS, especially in the context of a 'Restricted procedure'.
Volledigheid83/100

The tender information is severely incomplete. Crucially, no tender documents are attached or available, and detailed evaluation criteria are missing. Only high-level requirements are listed, making it impossible for bidders to prepare a comprehensive and compliant submission.

No tender documents attached or available, which is a critical omission.
Missing detailed evaluation criteria, making the assessment process opaque.
Eerlijkheid80/100

Without full tender documents, detailed evaluation criteria, or specific financial/technical thresholds, it is impossible to fully assess the fairness of this tender. The lack of transparency due to missing documents creates an information asymmetry, potentially disadvantaging bidders who lack prior insight. The mention of 'specific eligibility criteria set by Southampton City Council in the full tender documents' without those documents could lead to arbitrary exclusions.

Absence of full tender documents creates an information asymmetry among potential bidders.
Lack of detailed evaluation criteria prevents objective assessment of selection and award processes.
Praktische uitvoerbaarheid40/100

The tender is highly impractical for potential bidders due to the complete absence of supporting documents. Bidders cannot understand the full scope, detailed requirements, or the application process, making it impossible to prepare a meaningful and compliant bid. While a DPS aims for practicality in continuous entry, the initial setup information is insufficient.

Bidders cannot prepare a submission without access to full tender documents.
Unclear application process for the DPS due to missing detailed instructions.
Gegevensconsistentie100/100

A significant inconsistency exists between the tender's classification as 'Type: Restricted' and 'Procedure: Restricted procedure' and its description and requirements repeatedly referring to a 'Dynamic Purchasing System (DPS)'. These are fundamentally different procurement mechanisms and this conflict needs immediate resolution.

Inconsistency between 'Restricted procedure' and 'Dynamic Purchasing System' designation.
Duurzaamheid0/100

No information regarding green procurement criteria, social considerations, or innovation focus is provided in the extracted requirements or automated checks. This indicates a lack of emphasis on sustainability aspects within the tender's current presentation.

Absence of green procurement criteria.
No mention of social criteria.

Sterke punten

Clear title and reference number provided.
Organization and general description of services are specified.
Estimated value and contract duration are disclosed.
CPV code is provided for classification.
The use of a DPS, if correctly implemented, allows for flexibility and continuous entry for new suppliers.

Aandachtspunten

**Critical:** Complete absence of full tender documents and detailed content.
Fundamental inconsistency between 'Restricted procedure' and 'Dynamic Purchasing System' designations.
Missing detailed evaluation criteria, making the selection process opaque.
Lack of specific financial and technical thresholds, hindering bidder preparation.
No explicit inclusion of sustainability, social, or innovation criteria.

Aanbevelingen

1. Immediately publish all full tender documents, including detailed scope, terms and conditions, and comprehensive evaluation criteria.
2. Clarify the exact procurement procedure: explicitly state whether it is a Restricted procedure or a Dynamic Purchasing System, and ensure all related documentation aligns with the chosen procedure.
3. Provide specific, measurable, and objective financial and technical requirements to ensure fairness, transparency, and enable bidders to accurately assess their eligibility.

Voorbeeld van AI-score

Meld je aan om volledige vereisten en analyse te bekijken

Volledige analyse van de kwaliteitsscore
Gedetailleerde uitsplitsing van subscores
Inzichten in sterke en zwakke punten
Strategische aanbevelingen

Geen creditcard vereist • Setup in 2 minuten

Toevoegen aan pipeline