Wil je inschrijven op overheidsaanbestedingen? Bekijk onze TaaS aanbestedingsvoorbereidingsservice
Aanbestedingen

South Farnham Educational Trust - Schoonmaak Aanbesteding

Open
Deadline
107 dagen resterend
Juli 31, 2026
Contractdetails
Categorie
Open Procedure
Referentie
023901-2026
Waarde
£2,598,000
Locatie
Surrey, East and West Sussex, Verenigd Koninkrijk
Gepubliceerd
April 08, 2026
CPV-code
Projecttijdlijn

Aanbesteding gepubliceerd

Maart 17, 2026

Deadline voor vragen

Juli 24, 2026

Deadline voor inschrijving

Juli 31, 2026

Startdatum contract

Juli 31, 2026

Budget
£2,598,000
Looptijd
36 maanden
Locatie
Surrey, East and West Sussex
Type
Open Procedure
75
Kwaliteitsscore/100
Goed

Originele aanbestedingsbeschrijving

De succesvolle inschrijver zal worden verplicht om uitstekende schoonmaakdiensten te leveren in alle scholen. De contractduur die wordt aanbesteed is 3 jaar, van 01/08/2026 – 31/07/2029. Er is een optie voor een verdere verlengingsperiode van maximaal twee extra jaren tot 31/07/2031.

Risicoanalyse

Risicoanalyse is nog niet beschikbaar voor aanbestedingen uit dit land. Momenteel ondersteund: Estland, Letland, Litouwen, Polen, Frankrijk, VK, Denemarken, Nederland, Noorwegen en Finland.

Winststrategie

Ontvang een AI-gestuurde winnende strategie, afgestemd op deze aanbesteding. Inclusief winstkansscore, belangrijke kansen en uitdagingen, aanbevolen focusgebieden voor de inschrijving, inzichten in concurrentiepositie en actiegerichte aanbevelingen om je kansen te maximaliseren.

Inloggen

Concurrenten

Upgrade om te zien welke bedrijven waarschijnlijk op deze aanbesteding zullen inschrijven, gebaseerd op historische inkoopgegevens.

Inloggen

Vereisten & Kwalificaties

21 vereisten over 5 categorieën

Indiening (5)
Verplicht (1)
Naleving (3)
Technisch (8)
Financieel (4)
SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS5
--Tender to be submitted via the Delta eSourcing portal.
--Two-stage procurement process: Stage 1 - Procurement Specific Questionnaire (PSQ), Stage 2 - Invitation To Tender (ITT).
--Minimum score of 60% required to progress from Stage 1 to Stage 2.
MANDATORY EXCLUSION GROUNDS1
--No specific mandatory exclusion grounds are detailed in the provided text.
ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS3
--Minimum annual turnover of £1 million.
--Must be able to provide excellent cleaning services.
--Must be keen to work in partnership and deliver to highest abilities.
TECHNICAL CAPABILITY REQUIREMENTS8
--Provide excellent cleaning services across all 7 schools (8 sites).
--Ability to provide core term time cleaning.
--Ability to provide periodic deep cleaning throughout the year.
FINANCIAL REQUIREMENTS4
--Contract value: £2,165,000 for the initial 3-year term.
--Contract type: Fixed price contract.
--Invoices to be raised monthly to the schools.

Voorbeeld van vereisten

Meld je aan om volledige vereisten en analyse te bekijken

Documenten

3 documenten beschikbaar met AI-samenvattingen

OCDS RecordDOC
023901-2026_ocds_record.json

Geen samenvatting beschikbaar voor dit document.

OCDS Release PackageDOC
023901-2026_ocds_release.json

Geen samenvatting beschikbaar voor dit document.

Official PDF VersionPDF
023901-2026_official.pdf

Geen samenvatting beschikbaar voor dit document.

Voorbeeld van documenten

Meld je aan om document samenvattingen en analyse te bekijken

75
Goed

Kwaliteitsscore aanbesteding

This tender for cleaning services is generally well-structured with clear requirements and a defined process. However, it lacks explicit details on evaluation criteria beyond the price/quality split and has limited information on sustainability aspects.

Scoreoverzicht

Wettelijke naleving75/100

The tender specifies a competitive flexible procedure with a two-stage approach, which is a recognized procurement method. The CPV code is appropriate. Deadlines are provided, though the submission deadline relative to the contract start date might be tight. No disputes are indicated. Regulatory compliance is assumed but not explicitly detailed.

Duidelijkheid80/100

The description of the Trust and the scope of services is clear. Requirements for service quality, management style, and staff development are articulated. The two-stage process and evaluation weighting (price/quality) are specified. However, the exact evaluation criteria for the quality component are not detailed.

Missing evaluation criteria beyond price/quality weighting.
Volledigheid70/100

Most basic information is present, including title, reference, organization, description, estimated value, and contract duration. The contract start and end dates are provided, along with an option for extension. However, no document content is available, and the 'reveal date' is missing.

No document content available.
Missing reveal date.
Eerlijkheid85/100

The tender is open, and the estimated value is disclosed. The competitive flexible procedure with a minimum score to progress promotes fairness. The criteria for progression and evaluation are generally objective, although specific quality criteria are not detailed. The use of an e-sourcing portal is positive.

Praktische uitvoerbaarheid65/100

The tender utilizes an e-sourcing portal for submission, which is practical. The contract start date is provided. Financing information is not explicitly detailed beyond the contract value. The duration is clearly stated with an extension option.

Financing information not explicitly detailed.
Gegevensconsistentie90/100

Key fields such as title, reference, organization, value, and dates are populated. There are no indications of suspension or disputes. The dates provided (submission deadline, contract start, contract duration) are logically presented, although the submission deadline is very close to the contract start date.

Submission deadline is very close to the contract start date.
Duurzaamheid50/100

There is no explicit mention of green procurement, social aspects, or innovation as mandatory criteria, although innovation is welcomed. The tender is not indicated as EU funded.

No explicit green procurement criteria.
No explicit social criteria.

Sterke punten

Clear description of the Trust and service scope.
Defined two-stage procurement process.
Disclosure of estimated value and contract duration.
Use of an e-sourcing portal for submission.

Aandachtspunten

Lack of detailed evaluation criteria for the quality component.
No document content available for review.
Limited explicit focus on sustainability aspects.

Aanbevelingen

1. Provide detailed criteria for the quality evaluation in Stage 2.
2. Make tender documents accessible through the portal.
3. Consider incorporating specific sustainability or social value objectives.

Voorbeeld van AI-score

Meld je aan om volledige vereisten en analyse te bekijken

Volledige analyse van de kwaliteitsscore
Gedetailleerde uitsplitsing van subscores
Inzichten in sterke en zwakke punten
Strategische aanbevelingen

Geen creditcard vereist • Setup in 2 minuten

Toevoegen aan pipeline