Aanbesteding van totaalkostadvies in verband met het Møns Klint Trappenconcept

This tender for total advisory services for the Møns Klint Staircase Concept is generally well-structured, with clear objectives and relevant CPV codes. However, it lacks specific financial requirements and detailed evaluation criteria, impacting completeness and fairness.

The tender adheres to general legal compliance by specifying an open procedure and providing a CPV code. Deadlines appear reasonable given the project's scope. No disputes are noted. The procedure type is listed as 'competition' which is a bit vague but acceptable.

The description of the project's purpose and scope is clear, emphasizing the need for resilient access to a UNESCO World Heritage site. Eligibility and technical capability requirements are outlined, providing a good understanding of the expected expertise.

While basic information like title, organization, and description are present, crucial details such as estimated value and contract duration are missing. The absence of specific financial requirements and detailed evaluation criteria reduces the overall completeness.

The tender is an open procedure, promoting broad participation. Requirements are generally objective, focusing on technical capabilities. However, the lack of disclosed value and specific evaluation criteria could be perceived as less transparent, slightly impacting fairness.

The tender specifies e-procurement and provides a URL for external documents, which is positive. However, the absence of information regarding contract start date and financing details, along with the lack of explicit e-submission instructions (beyond general e-procurement mention), limits practicality.

Key fields such as title, reference, organization, and deadline are populated. The status is 'active', and no disputes are reported, indicating good data consistency.

The tender does not explicitly mention any green procurement, social aspects, or innovation requirements. While the project's context (UNESCO site) implies environmental consideration, it's not formally integrated into the procurement criteria.