Wil je inschrijven op overheidsaanbestedingen? Bekijk onze TaaS aanbestedingsvoorbereidingsservice
Aanbestedingen

Ontwerp en bouw van een kas

Open
Deadline
6 dagen resterend
April 22, 2026
Contractdetails
Categorie
Bouw
Referentie
307610
Waarde
€250,000
Locatie
Estonia, Estland
Gepubliceerd
Maart 27, 2026
CPV-code
Beoordelingscriteria
Total bid cost100%
Projecttijdlijn

Aanbesteding gepubliceerd

Maart 27, 2026

Deadline voor vragen

April 15, 2026

Deadline voor inschrijving

April 22, 2026

Opening van de aanbesteding

April 22, 2026

Startdatum contract

Mei 10, 2026

WinstkansPRO
🔒
Upgrade naar Professional
Bekijk je geschatte winstkans op basis van historische gegevens.
Upgrade naar Professional →
Buyer IntelligencePRO
🔒
Ontgrendel Buyer Intelligence
Bekijk uitgavenpatronen, voorkeursprocedures en meer.
Upgrade naar Professional →
SectorinzichtenPRO
🔒
Ontgrendel Sectorinzichten
Bekijk gemiddelde winnende prijzen, concurrentieniveaus en markttrends.
Upgrade naar Professional →
Budget
€250,000
Looptijd
Niet gespecificeerd
Locatie
Estonia
Type
Bouw
75
Kwaliteitsscore/100
Goed
Marktbenchmark
Gem. Winnende Prijs
€524,963
Gem. Inschrijvingen
4.7
Concurrentie
Gemiddeld
MKB-winnaars
94%
5,932 geanalyseerde aanbestedingen

Originele aanbestedingsbeschrijving

Ontwerp en bouw één kas met minimale afmetingen van 25 x 53 meter, inclusief de benodigde externe netwerken voor service, bij kwekerij RMK Kullenga (provincie Lääne-Viru, gemeente Tapa, dorp Porkuni, boswachterij Porkuni 65, kadastrale eenheid 78701:004:0640), volgens de technische specificatie en schetsmatige tekening.
Elektronische indiening

Risicoanalyse uitvoeren

Identificeer potentiële risico's, inconsistenties en rode vlaggen in alle aanbestedingsdocumenten. Ontvang een gedetailleerd risicorapport met ernstniveaus en aanbevelingen voor mitigatie.

Inloggen

Winststrategie

AI-gestuurde analyse van de vereisten, kansen en uitdagingen van deze aanbesteding. Krijg strategische inzichten om je winstkans te maximaliseren.

70%
Geschatte winstkansMatige match

This tender for the design and construction of a greenhouse at RMK Kullenga nursery presents a clear opportunity for a technically competent bidder focused on cost-efficiency. The primary evaluation driver is price, necessitating a lean, optimized bid. Key to success will be demonstrating a streamlined design and construction process that minimizes costs while adhering strictly to technical specifications and deadlines.

Kernboodschappen voor winst

Cost-Effective Design and Construction Excellence

Guaranteed On-Time Delivery and Compliance

Streamlined Project Execution without Subcontractors

Belangrijke Kansen
The explicit emphasis on the lowest price receiving maximum score is a significant opportunity for cost-focused bidders.
The prohibition of subcontractors simplifies the bid and reduces potential coordination risks, allowing a single entity to control costs and timelines.
The clear construction and occupancy permit deadlines provide a defined scope for project planning and resource allocation.
Belangrijke Uitdagingen
The absence of specified evaluation criteria beyond price means that price will be the sole determinant of success, potentially leading to aggressive bidding.

Develop a highly accurate cost model that accounts for all design, material, labor, and permitting costs, while ensuring profitability. Explore efficiencies in material sourcing and construction methods to achieve the lowest possible price without compromising quality or compliance.

The requirement for bidders to obtain permits and connect external networks can be time-consuming and subject to external delays.

Proactively engage with local authorities and utility providers during the bid preparation phase to understand permit timelines and connection processes. Build buffer time into the project schedule for these activities and clearly outline the proposed approach in the bid.

The tender is for a single, integrated project, requiring a bidder with comprehensive design and construction capabilities.

Ensure the bid team has all necessary in-house expertise for both design and construction, or clearly demonstrate how integrated project management will be achieved. Highlight past experience in delivering similar end-to-end projects.

Ideaal Inschrijversprofiel
An experienced construction company with a proven track record in designing and building specialized agricultural or horticultural structures. The ideal bidder will have strong project management capabilities, efficient supply chain management, and a deep understanding of cost optimization in construction, particularly within the Estonian context. They should also have a robust process for obtaining permits and managing external network connections.
Belangrijkste Vereisten
Design and construction of a greenhouse (min. 25 x 53 meters) with external network connections.
Demolition work included in the scope.
Obtaining necessary permits.
Adherence to construction deadline (16.10.2026) and occupancy permit deadline (30.11.2026).
Submission of a Hankepass (ESPD) electronically.
Confirmation of site visit.
No subcontractors allowed.
Belangrijkste onderscheidende factoren
Demonstrated ability to deliver projects within tight cost constraints while maintaining high quality.
A clear, efficient, and well-documented plan for permit acquisition and external network connections.
A highly optimized design that meets functional requirements with minimal material and construction complexity.
Kansen voor sociale waarde
While not explicitly required, consider a commitment to using locally sourced materials where feasible to support the local economy, and to implement waste reduction strategies during construction.
Focusgebieden voor de inschrijving
PriceMaximum Score

Conduct a thorough cost analysis, identify all direct and indirect costs, and optimize the design for cost-efficiency. Benchmark against similar projects to ensure competitiveness while maintaining a healthy profit margin. Consider bulk purchasing of materials and efficient construction methodologies.

Aanbevelingen5
Thorough Site Visit and Technical Specification Review
KritiekGemiddelde inspanning

Conduct a mandatory site visit and meticulously review the technical specification and sketch drawings. Understand the existing site conditions, potential challenges for demolition, and the exact requirements for external network connections. This will inform a more accurate and competitive cost estimate.

Ensures accurate pricing, identification of potential risks, and a bid that fully meets technical requirements.
Price Optimization Strategy
KritiekHoge inspanning

Given that price is the primary evaluation criterion, develop a lean and cost-effective design and construction plan. Focus on material efficiency, streamlined construction processes, and minimizing labor hours. Explore innovative but proven construction techniques that reduce overall cost.

Maximizes score for the price criterion, significantly increasing win probability.
Proactive Permit and Network Connection Planning
HoogGemiddelde inspanning

Investigate the permit acquisition process and external network connection requirements early. Engage with relevant authorities and utility providers to understand timelines, procedures, and potential costs. Incorporate realistic timelines for these activities into the project schedule.

Reduces risk of delays and cost overruns related to external dependencies.
Demonstrate Integrated Project Management Expertise
GemiddeldLage inspanning

Highlight the company's capability to manage the entire project lifecycle from design to construction, including all permitting and network connections, without subcontractors. Emphasize internal expertise and robust project management systems.

Builds confidence in the contracting authority regarding the bidder's ability to deliver efficiently and on time.
Accurate Hankepass (ESPD) Completion
KritiekLage inspanning

Ensure the Hankepass (ESPD) is completed accurately and electronically, providing all necessary self-declarations. Pay close attention to any specific instructions or clarifications provided in 'Hankepass täiendatavate selgitustega'.

Avoids disqualification due to administrative errors.
Concurrentiepositie
Position the bid as the most cost-effective solution that guarantees timely delivery and full compliance with all technical requirements, leveraging the absence of subcontractors as a strength for streamlined execution.

Concurrenten

Upgrade om te zien welke bedrijven waarschijnlijk op deze aanbesteding zullen inschrijven, gebaseerd op historische inkoopgegevens.

Inloggen

Vereisten & Kwalificaties

25 vereisten over 5 categorieën

Indiening (11)
Verplicht (1)
Naleving (4)
Technisch (6)
Financieel (3)
SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS11
--The tender is for a single, integrated construction project.
--The contracting authority has the right to change the expected contract award date.
--The contracting authority has the right to award the contract earlier than expected.
MANDATORY EXCLUSION GROUNDS1
--Bidders must not have criminal convictions for fraud, money laundering, or terrorist financing.
ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS4
--Bidders must confirm site visit.
--If submitting a joint bid, a power of attorney for joint bidders must be submitted.
--Bidders must define business secrets.
TECHNICAL CAPABILITY REQUIREMENTS6
--The project involves the design and construction of a covered seed greenhouse.
--Scope includes demolition work.
--Scope includes obtaining permits.
FINANCIAL REQUIREMENTS3
--The total cost of the bid will be evaluated.
--The lowest price will receive the maximum score.
--The estimated value of the tender is 250,000.0 EUR.

Voorbeeld van vereisten

Meld je aan om volledige vereisten en analyse te bekijken

Documenten

9 documenten beschikbaar met AI-samenvattingen

Alltöövõtjate kontrollimise tingimused lepingu täitmise etapisPDF
307610_alltoovotjate_kontrollimise_tingimused... -- 41.1 KB

The contracting authority will check subcontractors' backgrounds regarding criminal convictions for fraud, money laundering, or terrorist financing, requiring relevant explanations and proof of reliability.

VastavustingimusedPDF
307610_vastavustingimused.pdf -- 8.1 KB

Bidders must confirm site visit, submit power of attorney for joint bids, define trade secrets, and confirm non-engagement of subcontractors to ensure their bid complies with tender conditions.

Hindamiskriteeriumid ja hinnatavad näitajadPDF
307610_hindamiskriteeriumid.pdf -- 4.1 KB

The tender evaluates the total bid cost, where the lowest price receives the maximum score, covering design and construction works.

Hankepass täiendatavate selgitustegaPDF
307610_hankepass_taiendavate_selgitustega.pdf -- 72.4 KB

The Procurement Pass (ESPD) is a self-declaration by the economic operator, serving as preliminary evidence instead of certificates issued by authorities or third parties, and is filled out electronically.

Tehnilise kirjelduse lisa- Fotod olemasolevast olukorrastZIP
Fotod.zip -- 62.2 MB

Geen samenvatting beschikbaar voor dit document.

HankedokumentDOC
HD_307610_3700.docx -- 60.1 KB

The State Forest Management Centre is seeking bids for the design and construction of a greenhouse for seedling production, with a completion deadline of 16.10.2026 and occupancy permit by 30.11.2026.

Ühispakkujate volikiri ja kinnitusDOC
HD Lisa 1, vorm 1 - Ühispakkujate volikiri (3... -- 35.5 KB

This document is a joint bidder authorization and confirmation, required for tender submission.

Tehniline kirjeldusDOC
Lisa 1 - Tehniline kirjeldus.docx -- 248.2 KB

The tender seeks proposals for the design and construction of a covering seedling greenhouse, including demolition, permit acquisition, and external network connections.

Hankelepingu vormDOC
Lisa 2- Hankelepingu vorm_307610_3700.docx -- 51.8 KB

The tender contract form defines the terms, parties, contract object, and general provisions for design and construction works, including insurance requirements and deadlines.

Voorbeeld van documenten

Meld je aan om document samenvattingen en analyse te bekijken

75
Goed

Kwaliteitsscore aanbesteding

This tender for greenhouse design and construction is generally well-structured, with clear technical requirements and a reasonable process. However, it lacks explicit sustainability considerations and some practical aspects of e-submission could be improved.

Scoreoverzicht

Wettelijke naleving75/100

The tender appears to comply with general procurement regulations, including the use of a proper CPV code and a clear procedure. Deadlines are reasonable, and no disputes are noted. The procedure is classified as 'A' (Open Procedure), which is standard.

Duidelijkheid80/100

The description of the project is clear, detailing the scope of work for designing and constructing a greenhouse with specific dimensions and external network connections. Technical specifications and site location are well-defined. Requirements are documented.

Volledigheid70/100

Most basic information is present, including estimated value, duration, and deadlines. However, the contract start date is presented in a format that might require interpretation. While many documents are attached, the AI could not analyze all file types.

Eerlijkheid85/100

The tender offers full document access and discloses the estimated value. Criteria are objective (relative weighting, lowest price gets max score). E-procurement is utilized. There are no obvious requirements tailored to specific companies, promoting fairness.

Praktische uitvoerbaarheid65/100

E-submission is mandated, and a document URL is provided for the opening place. The contract start date is specified. Financing information is not explicitly detailed, and the duration is defined by 'PERIOD' which is standard but could be more precise in the summary.

Gegevensconsistentie90/100

Key fields such as title, reference, organization, and deadlines are populated. There are no noted suspensions or disputes. Dates appear logically sequenced, with a reasonable gap between submission and opening.

Duurzaamheid50/100

The tender does not explicitly mention green procurement, social aspects, or innovation. It is not indicated as EU funded. This area is underdeveloped.

Lack of explicit green procurement criteria
Absence of social responsibility considerations

Sterke punten

Clear technical description and scope of work
Well-defined project location and CPV code
Use of e-procurement and electronic submission
Objective evaluation criteria (price-based weighting)

Aandachtspunten

Limited explicit sustainability considerations
Some practicalities of e-submission could be clearer (e.g., file format compatibility)
Financing information not explicitly detailed

Aanbevelingen

1. Incorporate specific sustainability criteria (e.g., energy efficiency, material sourcing) in future tenders.
2. Ensure all attached documents are in AI-analyzable formats or provide summaries for all.
3. Provide more explicit details on financing arrangements if applicable.

Voorbeeld van AI-score

Meld je aan om volledige vereisten en analyse te bekijken

Volledige analyse van de kwaliteitsscore
Gedetailleerde uitsplitsing van subscores
Inzichten in sterke en zwakke punten
Strategische aanbevelingen

Geen creditcard vereist • Setup in 2 minuten

Toevoegen aan pipeline