Wil je inschrijven op overheidsaanbestedingen? Bekijk onze TaaS aanbestedingsvoorbereidingsservice
Aanbestedingen

Preparation of a battery bank feasibility study

Gesloten

Deadline voor indiening verstreken

De deadline voor het indienen van deze aanbesteding is verstreken en er worden geen aanvragen meer geaccepteerd. De onderstaande informatie wordt ter referentie bewaard.

Bekijk actieve aanbestedingen
Deadline
Verlopen
Maart 31, 2026
Contractdetails
Categorie
Diensten
Referentie
307566
Waarde
€1,000
Locatie
Estonia, Estland
Gepubliceerd
Maart 13, 2026
Organisatie
CPV-code
Beoordelingscriteria
Cost of the analysis100%
Projecttijdlijn

Aanbesteding gepubliceerd

Maart 13, 2026

Deadline voor vragen

Maart 24, 2026

Deadline voor inschrijving

Maart 31, 2026

Opening van de aanbesteding

Maart 31, 2026

WinstkansPRO
🔒
Upgrade naar Professional
Bekijk je geschatte winstkans op basis van historische gegevens.
Upgrade naar Professional →
Buyer IntelligencePRO
🔒
Ontgrendel Buyer Intelligence
Bekijk uitgavenpatronen, voorkeursprocedures en meer.
Upgrade naar Professional →
SectorinzichtenPRO
🔒
Ontgrendel Sectorinzichten
Bekijk gemiddelde winnende prijzen, concurrentieniveaus en markttrends.
Upgrade naar Professional →
Budget
€1,000
Looptijd
Niet gespecificeerd
Locatie
Estonia
Type
Diensten
75
Kwaliteitsscore/100
Goed
Marktbenchmark
Gem. Winnende Prijs
€71,415
Gem. Inschrijvingen
4.8
Concurrentie
Gemiddeld
MKB-winnaars
99%
2,006 geanalyseerde aanbestedingen

Originele aanbestedingsbeschrijving

The subject is the preparation of a feasibility study for a battery bank (energy storage) for the Vastseliina school building, in accordance with the technical specification (HD Annex 1) and the contracting authority's conditions. The purpose of the study is to determine the economic and technical feasibility of the battery bank, a suitable solution for ensuring backup power, and to provide recommendations for making an investment decision.
Elektronische indiening

Risicoanalyse uitvoeren

Identificeer potentiële risico's, inconsistenties en rode vlaggen in alle aanbestedingsdocumenten. Ontvang een gedetailleerd risicorapport met ernstniveaus en aanbevelingen voor mitigatie.

Inloggen

Winststrategie

AI-gestuurde analyse van de vereisten, kansen en uitdagingen van deze aanbesteding. Krijg strategische inzichten om je winstkans te maximaliseren.

70%
Geschatte winstkansMatige match

This tender prioritizes cost above all else, making aggressive pricing the primary driver for success. While technical capability is essential, the low estimated value suggests a focus on efficiency and streamlined delivery. Bidders should leverage their existing expertise and cost-effective delivery models to secure this contract.

Kernboodschappen voor winst

Most Cost-Effective and Efficient Feasibility Study for Vastseliina School.

Proven Expertise in Energy Storage Analysis, Delivered with Maximum Value.

Belangrijke Kansen
Dominant focus on cost allows for aggressive pricing strategies.
Low estimated value may deter larger, more overhead-intensive competitors.
Clear deliverables (report, model, drawings, meeting) provide a defined scope for efficient service delivery.
Absence of specific green or social value requirements simplifies bid preparation, allowing focus on core technical and cost elements.
Belangrijke Uitdagingen
Extremely low budget (1000 EUR) for a comprehensive feasibility study, potentially leading to unrealistic expectations or a race to the bottom on price.

Clearly define the scope and deliverables within the bid to manage expectations. Focus on efficient, streamlined processes and leverage existing templates/tools to minimize delivery costs. Ensure the bid price is sustainable for the required quality.

High competition due to the simplicity of the technical requirements and the cost-driven evaluation.

Aggressively price the bid to be the lowest. Highlight efficiency and cost-effectiveness in the bid narrative, even if not explicitly asked for.

Potential for bidders to underbid and compromise quality, leading to a poor study outcome for the client.

While pricing low, subtly emphasize the quality and thoroughness of the proposed methodology to assure the client that cost savings do not equate to compromised quality. Focus on efficient methodologies rather than cutting corners.

Ideaal Inschrijversprofiel
A small to medium-sized consultancy or an individual expert with a proven track record in energy feasibility studies and a lean operational model. They should possess strong analytical skills and the ability to deliver high-quality reports efficiently, minimizing overheads.
Belangrijkste Vereisten
Preparation of a feasibility study for a battery storage system for Vastseliina school building.
Assessment of economic and technical feasibility.
Identification of suitable solutions and backup power options.
Submission of a complete PDF report, Excel model, conceptual drawings, and a presentation meeting.
Adherence to all conditions in base documents and contract draft.
Declaration confirming bid meets all conditions.
Explanation of business secrets.
Cost breakdown according to specified structure.
Belangrijkste onderscheidende factoren
The lowest price submitted.
Demonstrated efficiency in delivering similar studies.
Clarity and conciseness of the proposed cost breakdown.
Kansen voor sociale waarde
While not a requirement, consider a brief mention of how the proposed battery storage system could contribute to the school's long-term sustainability goals or educational opportunities for students, if applicable and easily integrated into the study's findings. This adds a subtle positive element without increasing bid cost.
Focusgebieden voor de inschrijving
Cost of the analysis100.0%

Submit the absolute lowest viable price. Conduct a thorough cost analysis to ensure profitability while remaining highly competitive. Leverage existing tools, templates, and efficient workflows to minimize labor costs. Consider a lean team or an individual expert.

Aanbevelingen6
Aggressively Price for the Lowest Bid
KritiekHoge inspanning

Given the 100% cost weighting, the primary focus must be on submitting the lowest possible price that is still sustainable. Analyze internal costs meticulously and identify areas for efficiency gains to enable a highly competitive bid.

Directly maximizes score for the primary evaluation criterion.
Ensure Comprehensive Deliverables in Price
KritiekGemiddelde inspanning

The bid price must explicitly cover all listed deliverables: complete PDF report, Excel model, conceptual drawings, and a presentation meeting. Ensure the cost breakdown reflects these components accurately to avoid perceived omissions.

Prevents disqualification and ensures all client expectations are met within the bid.
Streamline Study Methodology
HoogGemiddelde inspanning

Develop a highly efficient and standardized methodology for conducting the feasibility study. Utilize templates, pre-existing data analysis tools, and a focused approach to minimize time and resources spent on each task.

Reduces internal costs, enabling a lower bid price while maintaining quality.
Manage Scope Expectations Clearly
HoogLage inspanning

While not explicitly required to detail scope in the bid, ensure the internal understanding of the scope is precise. If any ambiguity exists, consider a brief clarification in the bid submission (if permitted) or be prepared to address it during the presentation to avoid scope creep that could erode profitability.

Protects profitability and ensures client satisfaction within the defined budget.
Highlight Efficiency and Speed (Subtly)
GemiddeldLage inspanning

Although not a formal evaluation criterion, subtly emphasize in the bid narrative (if space allows) the bidder's ability to deliver high-quality analysis efficiently. This can be achieved through phrasing like 'our streamlined approach ensures timely and cost-effective delivery'.

Positions the bidder as a smart choice, even if cost is paramount.
Accurate Cost Breakdown
KritiekGemiddelde inspanning

Adhere strictly to the specified cost breakdown structure. Ensure all costs are clearly itemized and justifiable, demonstrating a transparent and well-managed approach to pricing.

Meets submission requirements and builds client confidence in the pricing.
Concurrentiepositie
Position the bid as the most economically advantageous offer, emphasizing efficiency and a lean operational model that allows for superior cost savings without compromising essential deliverables. Highlight the ability to deliver precisely what is asked for, at the lowest possible price.

Concurrenten

Upgrade om te zien welke bedrijven waarschijnlijk op deze aanbesteding zullen inschrijven, gebaseerd op historische inkoopgegevens.

Inloggen

Vereisten & Kwalificaties

12 vereisten over 5 categorieën

Indiening (4)
Verplicht (1)
Naleving (2)
Technisch (3)
Financieel (2)
SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS4
--Bids will be evaluated primarily based on the cost of the analysis, with the lowest price receiving the maximum score.
--The deadline for submission is 2026-03-31 12:00:00.
--The bid must adhere to all conditions set forth in the tender's base documents.
MANDATORY EXCLUSION GROUNDS1
--No specific mandatory exclusion grounds are detailed in the provided documents.
ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS2
--Bidders must submit a declaration confirming their bid meets all conditions specified in the tender documents.
--Bidders must provide an explanation of their business secrets.
TECHNICAL CAPABILITY REQUIREMENTS3
--The service provider must be able to prepare a feasibility study for a battery storage system.
--The study should assess the economic and technical feasibility of a battery storage system for the Vastseliina school building.
--The study should identify suitable solutions and backup power options.
FINANCIAL REQUIREMENTS2
--The total value of the tender is 1000.0 EUR.
--Bids must be submitted with a cost according to the specified structure.

Voorbeeld van vereisten

Meld je aan om volledige vereisten en analyse te bekijken

Documenten

6 documenten beschikbaar met AI-samenvattingen

VastavustingimusedPDF
307566_vastavustingimused.pdf -- 3.7 KB

Bidders must provide a clarification of their business secrets and confirm that their bid meets all conditions set forth in the tender documents, including submitting the cost according to the provided structure.

Hindamiskriteeriumid ja hinnatavad näitajadPDF
307566_hindamiskriteeriumid.pdf -- 2.9 KB

The contracting authority will evaluate bids primarily based on the cost of the analysis, with the lowest price receiving the maximum score.

Hankepass täiendatavate selgitustegaPDF
307566_hankepass_taiendavate_selgitustega.pdf -- 33.8 KB

The tender pass is an initial self-declaration by the economic operator, intended for familiarization with the contracting authority's conditions, not for completion.

Hankedokument (HD)DOC
Hankedokument (HD).docx -- 31.3 KB

The Võru Municipality is seeking a service provider to prepare a feasibility study for a battery storage system, including guidance for proposal preparation.

Lisa 1 Tehniline kirjeldus (TK)DOC
Lisa 1_Lähteülesanne (LÜ)_akupanga tasuvusana... -- 23.7 KB

The contracting authority seeks a service provider to prepare a feasibility study for a battery energy storage system for the Vastseliina school building, assessing its economic and technical viability, suitable solutions, and backup power capabilities.

Lisa 2 Hankelepingu projektDOC
Lisa 2_Hankelepingu projekt_akupanga tasuvusa... -- 34.9 KB

This document is a draft of the service contract outlining the terms and conditions, rights, and obligations of the parties involved in preparing a feasibility study for a battery storage system.

Voorbeeld van documenten

Meld je aan om document samenvattingen en analyse te bekijken

75
Goed

Kwaliteitsscore aanbesteding

This tender for a feasibility study on a battery storage system is generally well-structured, with clear technical requirements and a straightforward evaluation based on price. However, it lacks explicit sustainability considerations and could benefit from a more detailed procurement process.

Scoreoverzicht

Wettelijke naleving75/100

The tender includes a clear CPV code, reasonable deadlines, and a disclosed estimated value. The procedure is defined, and there are no immediate indications of disputes or regulatory non-compliance. The financing condition is somewhat vague, referring to a contract project.

Duidelijkheid80/100

The description of the service required (feasibility study for a battery storage system) is clear. Technical specifications are provided, and the evaluation criteria (primarily cost) are specified. Conditions for submission are outlined.

Volledigheid70/100

Basic information such as title, organization, and deadline is present. The estimated value and duration type are specified. However, the financing condition is not fully elaborated, and the reliance on a contract project for performance details could be more explicit.

Eerlijkheid85/100

The tender is open for electronic submission and e-procurement. The evaluation criteria are objective (lowest price). Full document access is implied through the listed documents. No specific tailoring to individual companies was identified.

Praktische uitvoerbaarheid65/100

Electronic submission and e-procurement are supported. The contract start date is not explicitly mentioned, and financing is stated as 'According to the contract project', which lacks specific detail. The duration is specified in days, aligning with the tender valid period.

Financing condition is vague.
Gegevensconsistentie90/100

Key fields like title, reference, organization, and deadline are populated. There are no reported disputes or suspensions. Dates are logical and consistent with the tender lifecycle.

Duurzaamheid50/100

The tender does not explicitly mention any green procurement, social aspects, or innovation focus. It is not stated as EU-funded.

Lack of sustainability considerations.

Sterke punten

Clear technical description
Objective evaluation criteria (price)
Electronic submission and e-procurement enabled
Well-defined CPV code

Aandachtspunten

Vague financing condition
Lack of explicit sustainability criteria
Contract start date not specified

Aanbevelingen

1. Provide more specific details on financing terms.
2. Incorporate sustainability criteria into the evaluation.
3. Specify the contract start date or a range.

Voorbeeld van AI-score

Meld je aan om volledige vereisten en analyse te bekijken

Volledige analyse van de kwaliteitsscore
Gedetailleerde uitsplitsing van subscores
Inzichten in sterke en zwakke punten
Strategische aanbevelingen

Geen creditcard vereist • Setup in 2 minuten

Toevoegen aan pipeline