Atgal į konkursus

Porijõe pėsčiųjų tilto preliminariasis projektas

Uždarytas
Galutinis terminas
Liko 0 dienų
Kovas 03, 2026
Informacija apie sutartį
Kategorija
Paslaugos
Nuoroda
306478
Vertė
€10,000
Vieta
Estonia, Estija
Paskelbta
Vasaris 19, 2026
Organizacija
CPV kodas
Vertinimo kriterijai
Cost100%
Projekto grafikas

Konkursas paskelbtas

Vasaris 19, 2026

Klausimų pateikimo terminas

Vasaris 24, 2026

Pasiūlymų pateikimo terminas

Kovas 03, 2026

Konkurso atidarymas

Kovas 03, 2026

Laimėjimo tikimybėPRO
🔒
Atnaujinti į Professional
Peržiūrėkite savo apskaičiuotą laimėjimo tikimybę pagal istorinius duomenis.
Atnaujinti į Professional →
Pirkėjo analitikaPRO
🔒
Atrakinkite pirkėjo analitiką
Peržiūrėkite išlaidų modelius, pageidaujamas procedūras ir kita.
Atnaujinti į Professional →
Sektoriaus įžvalgosPRO
🔒
Atrakinkite sektoriaus įžvalgas
Peržiūrėkite vidutines laimėjimo kainas, konkurencijos lygius ir rinkos tendencijas.
Atnaujinti į Professional →
Biudžetas
€10,000
Trukmė
2 mėnesių
Vieta
Estonia
Tipas
Paslaugos
84
Kokybės įvertinimas/100
Puikiai
Rinkos lyginamoji analizė
Vidutinė laimėjimo kaina
€71,415
Vidutinis pasiūlymų skaičius
4.8
Konkurencija
Vidutinė
MVĮ laimėtojai
99%
2,006 išanalizuotų pirkimų skaičius

Originalus konkurso aprašymas

Pirkimo tikslas – pirmajame etape užsakyti Porijõe tilto preliminariąją projektą, neatliekant fizinių statybos tyrimų.
Elektroninis pateikimas

Rizikos analizė

Prisijunkite, kad galėtumėte naudoti rizikos analizę.

Prisijungti

Laimėjimo strategija

Prisijunkite, kad galėtumėte naudoti laimėjimo strategijos rekomendacijas.

Prisijungti

Konkurentai

Atnaujinkite, kad matytumėte, kurios įmonės greičiausiai pateiks pasiūlymą šiam konkursui, remiantis istoriniais viešųjų pirkimų duomenimis.

Prisijungti

Reikalavimai ir kvalifikacija

25 reikalavimų 5 kategorijose

Pateikimas (8)
Privalomas (1)
Atitiktis (5)
Techninis (8)
Finansinis (3)
SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS8
--Submit the bid by the deadline: 2026-03-03 09:00:00.
--Submit an electronically filled European Single Procurement Document (ESPD) in the expected format.
--Submit the "Application for participation in the procurement procedure" form.
MANDATORY EXCLUSION GROUNDS1
--Not be subject to any mandatory exclusion grounds as defined in the European Single Procurement Document (ESPD).
ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS5
--Confirm compliance with qualification requirements.
--Confirm agreement with the tender conditions.
--If submitting a joint bid, provide a power of attorney.
TECHNICAL CAPABILITY REQUIREMENTS8
--The project involves the preliminary design of the Porijõe pedestrian bridge.
--The preliminary design must specify the bridge type.
--The preliminary design must specify the bridge dimensions (gabariidid).
FINANCIAL REQUIREMENTS3
--Submit a financial offer for the preliminary design project.
--The preliminary design must include cost estimates (as part of the deliverable).
--Bids will be evaluated solely on price, with the lowest price receiving maximum points.

Reikalavimų peržiūra

Prisiregistruokite, kad peržiūrėtumėte visus reikalavimus ir analizę

Dokumentai

Yra 8 dokumentų su AI santraukomis

VastavustingimusedPDF
306478_vastavustingimused.pdf -- 6.6 KB

This document outlines the compliance conditions for submitting a tender, covering power of attorney for joint bids, declaration of business secrets, subcontractor involvement, and confirmation of bid adherence to terms.

Hindamiskriteeriumid ja hinnatavad näitajadPDF
306478_hindamiskriteeriumid.pdf -- 2.8 KB

This document describes the evaluation criteria for the Porijõe light traffic bridge preliminary design tender, where bids will be assessed solely based on cost, with the lowest bid receiving maximum points.

Hankepass täiendatavate selgitustegaPDF
306478_hankepass_taiendavate_selgitustega.pdf -- 40.7 KB

This ESPD is an informational document for the Porijõe pedestrian bridge preliminary design tender, outlining the conditions and expected response format for the electronically submitted ESPD, rather than being a form for direct completion.

HankedokumentDOC
Hanke alusdokument.docx -- 27.1 KB

This document is the basic public procurement document from Kambja Rural Municipality Government for the Porijõe light traffic bridge sketch project, outlining the procurement procedure type, deadlines, and contact information.

Lisa 2 Hankelepingu projektDOC
Hankelepingu projekt.docx -- 32.4 KB

This document is a draft service contract between Kambja Rural Municipality Government and a contractor, outlining the terms and scope for the preliminary design of the Porijõe light traffic bridge.

Lähteülesanne ja tehniline kirjeldusDOC
Lähteülesanne ja tehniline kirjeldus.docx -- 537.9 KB

This document outlines the terms of reference for the Porijõgi pedestrian bridge preliminary design, specifying requirements for bridge type, dimensions, load capacity, cost, and location.

Lisa 1 Jõeveere DP põhijoonisPDF
Lisa 1 Jõeveere DP põhijoonis.pdf -- 2.0 MB

This document is the main drawing of the Jõeveere detailed plan, providing background information and context for the design of the Porijõe pedestrian bridge.

Taotlus hankemenetluses osalemiseksDOC
Taotlus hankemenetluses osalemiseks.docx -- 23.4 KB

This document is an application for participation in the procurement procedure, where the tenderer confirms their agreement with the tender conditions and compliance with the qualification requirements.

Dokumentų peržiūra

Prisiregistruokite, kad peržiūrėtumėte dokumentų santraukas ir analizę

84
Puikiai

Konkurso kokybės įvertinimas

This tender for the preliminary design of the Porijõe pedestrian bridge is well-structured and transparent, particularly regarding its clear requirements and objective evaluation criteria. While generally compliant and complete, minor inconsistencies in metadata and a lack of explicit sustainability focus are noted.

Įvertinimo detalės

Atitiktis teisės aktams85/100

The tender adheres to national regulations for simplified procedures, with reasonable deadlines and proper CPV codes. A minor inconsistency in the evaluation criteria description is present but clarified by the detailed documents.

Minor inconsistency in evaluation criteria description (relative weighting vs. price-only) in high-level metadata.
Aiškumas90/100

The project description, technical requirements, and evaluation criteria are clearly defined and easily understandable, supported by comprehensive documentation.

Užbaigtumas95/100

All essential information, including basic details, financial data, timelines, and a full set of relevant documents, is provided. The XML document not being AI-analyzed is not a critical human-readable information gap.

Sąžiningumas95/100

The procurement ensures fairness through transparent evaluation criteria (lowest price), disclosed value, reasonable deadlines, and enabled e-procurement. Requirements are generic and not tailored to a specific company.

Praktiškumas80/100

Electronic submission is supported, and the contract duration is clearly specified. However, the contract start date and specific financing details are not explicitly provided.

Contract start date not explicitly provided.
Specific financing details (beyond estimated value) are not available.
Duomenų nuoseklumas80/100

Most data fields are consistent. A minor discrepancy exists between the high-level evaluation criteria description (relative_weighting) and the detailed document, which specifies price-only evaluation.

Inconsistency between 'Evaluation Criteria: relative_weighting' in basic info and 'Bids will be evaluated solely on price' in AI-extracted requirements/documents.
Tvarumas20/100

The tender does not explicitly include green, social, or innovation-related sustainability criteria. This is common for small, technical service procurements but results in a low score for this category.

No explicit green procurement criteria.
No explicit social criteria.

Privalumai

Clear and specific technical requirements for the preliminary design.
Transparent and objective evaluation criteria (lowest price).
Comprehensive documentation provided, including draft contract and technical specifications.
Electronic submission and e-procurement enabled, promoting accessibility.
Reasonable submission deadline for the scope and value of the project.

Problemos

Minor inconsistency in the stated evaluation criteria (relative weighting vs. price-only) in the metadata, though clarified in documents.
Lack of explicit sustainability, social, or innovation criteria.
Absence of a specified contract start date.

Rekomendacijos

1. Ensure consistency in all tender metadata, particularly regarding evaluation criteria, to avoid potential confusion.
2. Consider incorporating basic sustainability or social responsibility clauses, even for small procurements, where applicable.
3. Provide an estimated contract start date for better planning by potential bidders.

AI įvertinimo peržiūra

Prisiregistruokite, kad peržiūrėtumėte visus reikalavimus ir analizę

Išsami kokybės balo analizė
Detali sub-balų analizė
Privalumų ir trūkumų įžvalgos
Strateginės rekomendacijos

Nereikia kreditinės kortelės • Sąranka per 2 minutes

Įtraukti į „Pipeline“