Atgal į konkursus

Valstybinio kelio Nr. 11206 Vardja-Ravila 2,847 km esančio Ravilos tilto (103) rekonstravimo pagrindinio projekto parengimas

Atviras
Galutinis terminas
Liko 7 dienų
Kovas 09, 2026
Informacija apie sutartį
Kategorija
Paslaugos
Nuoroda
306465
Vertė
€30,000
Vieta
Estonia, Estija
Paskelbta
Vasaris 26, 2026
Organizacija
CPV kodas
Vertinimo kriterijai
Cost of the main project for the reconstruction of State Road No. 11206 Vardja-Ravila road km 2.847 Ravila bridge (103)100%
Projekto grafikas

Konkursas paskelbtas

Vasaris 26, 2026

Klausimų pateikimo terminas

Kovas 02, 2026

Pasiūlymų pateikimo terminas

Kovas 09, 2026

Konkurso atidarymas

Kovas 09, 2026

Laimėjimo tikimybėPRO
🔒
Atnaujinti į Professional
Peržiūrėkite savo apskaičiuotą laimėjimo tikimybę pagal istorinius duomenis.
Atnaujinti į Professional →
Pirkėjo analitikaPRO
🔒
Atrakinkite pirkėjo analitiką
Peržiūrėkite išlaidų modelius, pageidaujamas procedūras ir kita.
Atnaujinti į Professional →
Sektoriaus įžvalgosPRO
🔒
Atrakinkite sektoriaus įžvalgas
Peržiūrėkite vidutines laimėjimo kainas, konkurencijos lygius ir rinkos tendencijas.
Atnaujinti į Professional →
Biudžetas
€30,000
Trukmė
Nenurodyta
Vieta
Estonia
Tipas
Paslaugos
75
Kokybės įvertinimas/100
Gerai
Rinkos lyginamoji analizė
Vidutinė laimėjimo kaina
€71,415
Vidutinis pasiūlymų skaičius
4.8
Konkurencija
Vidutinė
MVĮ laimėtojai
99%
2,006 išanalizuotų pirkimų skaičius

Originalus konkurso aprašymas

Valstybinio kelio Nr. 11206 Vardja-Ravila 2,847 km esančio Ravilos tilto (103) rekonstravimo pagrindinio projekto parengimas, vadovaujantis viešojo pirkimo dokumentuose nustatytomis sąlygomis.
Elektroninis pateikimas

Rizikos analizė

Prisijunkite, kad galėtumėte naudoti rizikos analizę.

Prisijungti

Laimėjimo strategija

Prisijunkite, kad galėtumėte naudoti laimėjimo strategijos rekomendacijas.

Prisijungti

Konkurentai

Atnaujinkite, kad matytumėte, kurios įmonės greičiausiai pateiks pasiūlymą šiam konkursui, remiantis istoriniais viešųjų pirkimų duomenimis.

Prisijungti

Reikalavimai ir kvalifikacija

18 reikalavimų 5 kategorijose

Pateikimas (7)
Privalomas (4)
Atitiktis (4)
Techninis (1)
Finansinis (2)
SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS7
--Bidders must confirm acceptance of tender notice conditions.
--Bidders must justify business secrets.
--Bidders must declare their status regarding joint offers.
MANDATORY EXCLUSION GROUNDS4
--Bidders must confirm acceptance of tender notice conditions.
--Bidders must justify business secrets.
--Bidders must declare their status regarding joint offers.
ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS4
--Bidders must confirm acceptance of tender notice conditions.
--Bidders must justify business secrets.
--Bidders must declare their status regarding joint offers.
TECHNICAL CAPABILITY REQUIREMENTS1
--The tender is for the preparation of the main project for the reconstruction of the Ravila bridge. This implies a need for technical expertise in civil engineering and project design.
FINANCIAL REQUIREMENTS2
--The estimated value of the tender is 30,000.0 EUR.
--Bids will be evaluated primarily based on the total project cost, with the lowest price receiving the maximum score.

Reikalavimų peržiūra

Prisiregistruokite, kad peržiūrėtumėte visus reikalavimus ir analizę

Dokumentai

Yra 5 dokumentų su AI santraukomis

VastavustingimusedPDF
306465_vastavustingimused.pdf -- 6.5 KB

The contracting authority requires bidders to confirm acceptance of tender notice conditions, justify business secrets, state joint tender status, and provide authorized person details.

HD IV Töö osade üleandmise ja maksegraafikXLS
HD IV Too osade uleandmise ja maksegraafik.xl... -- 20.0 KB

This document outlines the work phases, deadlines, handover conditions, and payment schedule for the main design of the Ravila bridge, as part of the design contract.

Hindamiskriteeriumid ja hinnatavad näitajadPDF
306465_hindamiskriteeriumid.pdf -- 3.0 KB

The contracting authority evaluates bids primarily based on the total project cost, where the lowest price receives the maximum score.

Hankepass täiendatavate selgitustegaPDF
306465_hankepass_taiendavate_selgitustega.pdf -- 45.3 KB

The procurement pass (ESPD) is a self-declaration by the economic operator, serving as initial evidence instead of certificates issued by authorities or third parties, and includes the contracting authority's conditions and expected response formats.

Riigihanke alusdokumentDOC
Riigihanke alusdokument.docx -- 33.0 KB

The tender's foundational document contains general information about the procurement procedure, exclusion grounds, and qualification criteria, which are available on the e-procurement platform.

Dokumentų peržiūra

Prisiregistruokite, kad peržiūrėtumėte dokumentų santraukas ir analizę

75
Gerai

Konkurso kokybės įvertinimas

This tender for the design of the Ravila bridge reconstruction is generally well-structured, with clear requirements and a reasonable timeline. However, it lacks explicit sustainability considerations and some document formats are not AI-analyzable.

Įvertinimo detalės

Atitiktis teisės aktams75/100

The tender appears to comply with general legal requirements for public procurement. Deadlines are reasonable, and the procedure is indicated as LM (limited procedure). The CPV code is provided. No disputes are reported. The tender validity period is specified.

Aiškumas80/100

The description of the service required (preparation of the main project for bridge reconstruction) is clear. Key requirements such as mandatory exclusion grounds, eligibility, technical capability, and financial aspects are outlined. The evaluation criteria are mentioned as relative weighting, with price being the primary factor.

Užbaigtumas70/100

Most basic information is present, including title, reference, organization, estimated value, and deadlines. However, the location is specified as 'Täpne piirkond määramata' (precise area not defined), which could be more specific. Several important documents are in formats not supported by AI analysis (XML, ZIP), limiting a full assessment of their completeness.

Location specificity could be improved.
Inability to analyze certain document formats limits completeness assessment.
Sąžiningumas85/100

The tender promotes fairness through e-submission and e-procurement. The evaluation criteria are stated to be based on relative weighting, with price as the primary factor, which is objective. There are no apparent requirements tailored to specific companies. Full document access is implied through the e-procurement platform.

Praktiškumas65/100

E-submission and e-procurement are specified, enhancing practicality. The contract start date is not explicitly mentioned, but the tender valid period and submission deadline provide a timeframe. Financing information is not detailed. The duration type is specified as 'DAYS', but the exact duration is not given.

Contract start date not explicitly stated.
Financing information is not detailed.
Duomenų nuoseklumas90/100

Key fields such as title, reference, organization, estimated value, and deadlines are populated. There are no reported suspensions or disputes. The dates provided (Reveal Date, Submission Deadline, Opening Date) are logically ordered.

Tvarumas50/100

The tender does not explicitly mention green procurement, social aspects, or innovation. It is not indicated as EU funded. This area is underdeveloped.

Lack of explicit green procurement criteria.
Absence of social responsibility considerations.

Privalumai

Clear description of required services.
Use of e-procurement and e-submission.
Reasonable deadlines and validity period.
Objective evaluation criteria (price-focused).

Problemos

Limited sustainability considerations.
Inability to analyze certain document formats.
Vague location information.
Missing contract start date and detailed financing.

Rekomendacijos

1. Incorporate specific sustainability criteria (e.g., environmental impact, use of sustainable materials).
2. Ensure all essential documents are in AI-analyzable formats or provide summaries for them.
3. Provide a more precise location for the project site.

AI įvertinimo peržiūra

Prisiregistruokite, kad peržiūrėtumėte visus reikalavimus ir analizę

Išsami kokybės balo analizė
Detali sub-balų analizė
Privalumų ir trūkumų įžvalgos
Strateginės rekomendacijos

Nereikia kreditinės kortelės • Sąranka per 2 minutes

Įtraukti į „Pipeline“