Atgal į konkursus

Lifto šachtos ir lifto statyba Narvos kalbų licėjaus pastate, siekiant integruoti specialiųjų ugdymosi poreikių turinčius mokinius į mokymo procesą

Atviras
Galutinis terminas
Liko 14 dienų
Kovas 16, 2026
Informacija apie sutartį
Kategorija
Statyba
Nuoroda
306181
Vertė
€74,096
Vieta
Estonia, Estija
Paskelbta
Vasaris 17, 2026
CPV kodas
Vertinimo kriterijai
Total bid cost100%
Projekto grafikas

Konkursas paskelbtas

Vasaris 17, 2026

Klausimų pateikimo terminas

Kovas 09, 2026

Pasiūlymų pateikimo terminas

Kovas 16, 2026

Konkurso atidarymas

Kovas 16, 2026

Laimėjimo tikimybėPRO
🔒
Atnaujinti į Professional
Peržiūrėkite savo apskaičiuotą laimėjimo tikimybę pagal istorinius duomenis.
Atnaujinti į Professional →
Pirkėjo analitikaPRO
🔒
Atrakinkite pirkėjo analitiką
Peržiūrėkite išlaidų modelius, pageidaujamas procedūras ir kita.
Atnaujinti į Professional →
Sektoriaus įžvalgosPRO
🔒
Atrakinkite sektoriaus įžvalgas
Peržiūrėkite vidutines laimėjimo kainas, konkurencijos lygius ir rinkos tendencijas.
Atnaujinti į Professional →
Biudžetas
€74,096
Trukmė
5 mėnesių
Vieta
Estonia
Tipas
Statyba
82
Kokybės įvertinimas/100
Puikiai
Rinkos lyginamoji analizė
Vidutinė laimėjimo kaina
€524,963
Vidutinis pasiūlymų skaičius
4.7
Konkurencija
Vidutinė
MVĮ laimėtojai
94%
5,932 išanalizuotų pirkimų skaičius

Originalus konkurso aprašymas

Pagrindinis pirkėjo tikslas yra laiku ir optimaliomis sąnaudomis atlikti visus statybos darbus, numatytus projektinėje dokumentacijoje ir viešojo pirkimo pagrindiniuose dokumentuose. Pastatas turi atitikti visus teisės aktais ir standartais nustatytus reikalavimus, būti kuo patvaresnis ir ilgaamžiškesnis eksploatuojant, o jo priežiūros išlaidos turėtų būti kuo mažesnės.
Finansuojama ESElektroninis pateikimas

Rizikos analizė

Prisijunkite, kad galėtumėte naudoti rizikos analizę.

Prisijungti

Laimėjimo strategija

Prisijunkite, kad galėtumėte naudoti laimėjimo strategijos rekomendacijas.

Prisijungti

Konkurentai

Atnaujinkite, kad matytumėte, kurios įmonės greičiausiai pateiks pasiūlymą šiam konkursui, remiantis istoriniais viešųjų pirkimų duomenimis.

Prisijungti

Reikalavimai ir kvalifikacija

18 reikalavimų 5 kategorijose

Pateikimas (7)
Privalomas (2)
Atitiktis (5)
Techninis (2)
Finansinis (2)
SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS7
--The bidder must submit the bid price using the "Lisa 2 Pakkumuse maksumustabel (LIFT).xlsx" document.
--The bidder must submit the European Single Procurement Document (ESPD) electronically.
--The bidder must confirm the submission of costs.
MANDATORY EXCLUSION GROUNDS2
--The bidder (and its subcontractors) must not have committed criminal offenses such as fraud or money laundering.
--The bidder must meet the exclusion conditions described in the ESPD guide.
ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS5
--The bidder must confirm compliance with all tender conditions.
--The bidder must meet the qualification conditions described in the ESPD guide.
--In case of a joint bid, a power of attorney must be confirmed/provided.
TECHNICAL CAPABILITY REQUIREMENTS2
--The bidder must be capable of building and installing a lift shaft and lift according to the technical requirements specified in "Lisa 1 Tehniline kirjeldus (LIFT)_1702.doc".
--The lift and shaft must integrate SEN students into the learning process.
FINANCIAL REQUIREMENTS2
--The bidder must submit a detailed breakdown of the bid price.
--The bid price is the sole evaluation criterion, with the lowest price receiving maximum points.

Reikalavimų peržiūra

Prisiregistruokite, kad peržiūrėtumėte visus reikalavimus ir analizę

Dokumentai

Yra 7 dokumentų su AI santraukomis

Alltöövõtjate kontrollimise tingimused lepingu täitmise etapisPDF
306181_alltoovotjate_kontrollimise_tingimused... -- 20.8 KB

This document outlines the conditions for checking subcontractors and the grounds for their exclusion during the contract execution phase, focusing on criminal offenses such as fraud and money laundering.

VastavustingimusedPDF
306181_vastavustingimused.pdf -- 6.8 KB

This document specifies compliance conditions, requiring bidders to confirm joint bid authorization, declare business secrets, ensure subcontractor eligibility, and affirm adherence to all tender terms and cost submission.

Lisa 2. Pakkumuse maksumustabelXLS
Lisa 2 Pakkumuse maksumustabel (LIFT).xlsx -- 51.0 KB

This tender cost table is required for detailed submission of the bid price, including a breakdown of costs and unit prices for various cost groups and works.

Hindamiskriteeriumid ja hinnatavad näitajadPDF
306181_hindamiskriteeriumid.pdf -- 2.8 KB

This document describes the tender evaluation criteria, where the sole criterion is the total bid cost (100% weight), with the lowest price receiving the maximum points.

Hankepass täiendatavate selgitustegaPDF
306181_hankepass_taiendavate_selgitustega.pdf -- 70.3 KB

This document is an explanatory guide for completing the European Single Procurement Document (ESPD), outlining the contracting authority's qualification and exclusion criteria that bidders must submit electronically.

Lisa 1. Tehniline kirjeldusDOC
Lisa 1 Tehniline kirjeldus (LIFT)_1702.doc -- 85.0 KB

This document outlines the technical specifications for the construction of an elevator shaft and the installation of an elevator in the Narva Language Lyceum, aimed at integrating students with special educational needs into the learning process.

Lisa 3. Hankelepingu projektDOC
Lisa 3 Hankelepingu projekt (LIFT)_1702.docx -- 49.6 KB

This document is the draft works contract for the construction of a lift shaft and lift in the Narva Language Lyceum, outlining the contract terms and parties.

Dokumentų peržiūra

Prisiregistruokite, kad peržiūrėtumėte dokumentų santraukas ir analizę

82
Puikiai

Konkurso kokybės įvertinimas

This tender is generally well-structured and comprehensive, demonstrating good legal compliance and fairness. However, a notable inconsistency regarding the evaluation criteria and the lack of explicit green or innovation aspects slightly detract from its overall quality.

Įvertinimo detalės

Atitiktis teisės aktams85/100

The tender appears to comply with EU/national procurement regulations, utilizing ESPD and electronic submission for an EU-funded project. Deadlines are reasonable, and CPV codes are appropriately assigned. The procedure type is indicated by a code, which is common but could be more explicitly described for universal clarity.

Aiškumas75/100

The description and AI-extracted requirements are generally clear and well-documented, referring to specific annexes for technical specifications and submission forms. However, there is a direct contradiction between the 'Evaluation Criteria: relative_weighting' characteristic and the explicit statement in Document 2 and AI-extracted financial requirements that the 'sole criterion is the total bid cost (100% weight)'. This inconsistency significantly reduces clarity.

Contradiction in evaluation criteria description (relative weighting vs. lowest price only).
Užbaigtumas90/100

The tender is highly complete, providing all basic information, financial details, timelines, and location. All essential documents, including technical specifications, draft contract, and submission forms, are listed and appear to be available, ensuring bidders have comprehensive information.

Sąžiningumas95/100

Fairness is excellent, with full document access, disclosed value, and reasonable preparation time. The evaluation criterion (lowest price) is objective and transparent, and e-procurement ensures equal access. There is no indication that requirements are tailored to a specific company.

Praktiškumas80/100

The tender supports electronic submission and e-procurement, which enhances practicality. The contract duration and financing information are clearly specified. While a specific contract start date is not provided, this is typical for the tender stage.

Duomenų nuoseklumas70/100

Most key fields are populated, and dates are logical. However, the significant inconsistency regarding the evaluation criteria (relative weighting vs. 100% lowest price) is a notable flaw in data consistency.

Inconsistent description of evaluation criteria.
Tvarumas60/100

The tender explicitly addresses a strong social aspect by aiming to integrate SEN students into the learning process, which is commendable. It is also EU-funded, implying adherence to higher standards. However, there are no explicit green procurement or innovation-focused criteria mentioned.

Lack of explicit green procurement criteria.
No explicit innovation focus.

Privalumai

Clear social objective (integrating SEN students).
Comprehensive documentation provided.
High transparency and fairness in process.
Electronic submission and e-procurement enabled.
EU-funded project, implying robust standards.

Problemos

Contradiction in evaluation criteria description.
Lack of explicit green procurement criteria.
No explicit innovation focus.

Rekomendacijos

1. Clarify and harmonize the description of evaluation criteria to avoid ambiguity.
2. Consider incorporating explicit green procurement criteria where applicable.
3. Explore opportunities to include innovation-focused aspects in future tenders.

AI įvertinimo peržiūra

Prisiregistruokite, kad peržiūrėtumėte visus reikalavimus ir analizę

Išsami kokybės balo analizė
Detali sub-balų analizė
Privalumų ir trūkumų įžvalgos
Strateginės rekomendacijos

Nereikia kreditinės kortelės • Sąranka per 2 minutes

Įtraukti į „Pipeline“