Atgal į konkursus

Parksepos lietaus vandens sistemos projektavimas ir statyba

Atviras
Galutinis terminas
Liko 13 dienų
Kovas 16, 2026
Informacija apie sutartį
Kategorija
Statyba
Nuoroda
306097
Vertė
€16,100
Vieta
Estonia, Estija
Paskelbta
Vasaris 27, 2026
Organizacija
CPV kodas
Vertinimo kriterijai
Total cost of works100%
Projekto grafikas

Konkursas paskelbtas

Vasaris 27, 2026

Klausimų pateikimo terminas

Kovas 09, 2026

Pasiūlymų pateikimo terminas

Kovas 16, 2026

Konkurso atidarymas

Kovas 16, 2026

Laimėjimo tikimybėPRO
🔒
Atnaujinti į Professional
Peržiūrėkite savo apskaičiuotą laimėjimo tikimybę pagal istorinius duomenis.
Atnaujinti į Professional →
Pirkėjo analitikaPRO
🔒
Atrakinkite pirkėjo analitiką
Peržiūrėkite išlaidų modelius, pageidaujamas procedūras ir kita.
Atnaujinti į Professional →
Sektoriaus įžvalgosPRO
🔒
Atrakinkite sektoriaus įžvalgas
Peržiūrėkite vidutines laimėjimo kainas, konkurencijos lygius ir rinkos tendencijas.
Atnaujinti į Professional →
Biudžetas
€16,100
Trukmė
4 mėnesių
Vieta
Estonia
Tipas
Statyba
75
Kokybės įvertinimas/100
Gerai
Rinkos lyginamoji analizė
Vidutinė laimėjimo kaina
€524,963
Vidutinis pasiūlymų skaičius
4.7
Konkurencija
Vidutinė
MVĮ laimėtojai
94%
5,932 išanalizuotų pirkimų skaičius

Originalus konkurso aprašymas

Viešojo pirkimo objektas yra Parksepos lietaus vandens sistemos projektavimo ir statybos darbai Võru savivaldybėje, Võru apskrityje, kaip generalinis rangovas, pagal techninę specifikaciją ir perkančiosios organizacijos sąlygas.
Elektroninis pateikimas

Rizikos analizė

Prisijunkite, kad galėtumėte naudoti rizikos analizę.

Prisijungti

Laimėjimo strategija

Prisijunkite, kad galėtumėte naudoti laimėjimo strategijos rekomendacijas.

Prisijungti

Konkurentai

Atnaujinkite, kad matytumėte, kurios įmonės greičiausiai pateiks pasiūlymą šiam konkursui, remiantis istoriniais viešųjų pirkimų duomenimis.

Prisijungti

Reikalavimai ir kvalifikacija

11 reikalavimų 5 kategorijose

Pateikimas (4)
Privalomas (1)
Atitiktis (2)
Techninis (2)
Finansinis (2)
SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS4
--Bids must be prepared and submitted according to the instructions in the invitation to tender (HD Pakkumuse kutse Parksepa sademeveesüsteem.docx).
--Bidders must fulfill the conditions for submitting a bid, including submitting the cost in the prescribed form and justifying any business secrets (306097_vastavustingimused.pdf).
--The Hankepass must be completed electronically.
MANDATORY EXCLUSION GROUNDS1
--Bidders must not be subject to exclusion grounds as per Estonian Public Procurement Act.
ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS2
--Bidders must provide initial proof of qualification and compliance with tender conditions electronically via the Hankepass.
--Bidders must comply with the stated conditions for submitting a bid.
TECHNICAL CAPABILITY REQUIREMENTS2
--Bidders must fulfill the requirements defined in the technical specification (Lisa 2_Tehniline kirjeldus (TK)Parksepa sademeveesüsteem.docx).
--The work area boundaries are defined in TK Lisa2_Töömaa_piir.pdf.
FINANCIAL REQUIREMENTS2
--The bid price must be submitted in the prescribed form (Lisa 1_Maksumuse vorm.xlsx), detailing prices for different design and construction works of the stormwater system.
--The total cost of the works will be the basis for bid evaluation, with the lowest price receiving maximum points.

Reikalavimų peržiūra

Prisiregistruokite, kad peržiūrėtumėte visus reikalavimus ir analizę

Dokumentai

Yra 7 dokumentų su AI santraukomis

VastavustingimusedPDF
306097_vastavustingimused.pdf -- 6.4 KB

The contracting authority requires compliance with the conditions of conformity for tender submission, including submitting the cost in the prescribed format and justifying any business secrets.

Lisa 1: Maksumuse vormXLS
Lisa 1_Maksumuse vorm.xlsx -- 14.5 KB

The contracting authority requests the submission of a cost form detailing the prices for various works related to the design and construction of the stormwater system.

Hindamiskriteeriumid ja hinnatavad näitajadPDF
306097_hindamiskriteeriumid.pdf -- 3.1 KB

In the tender "Parksepa rainwater system design and construction", bids are evaluated based on the total cost of works, with the lowest price receiving the maximum score.

Hankepass täiendatavate selgitustegaPDF
306097_hankepass_taiendavate_selgitustega.pdf -- 33.7 KB

The tender pass is an initial confirmation of the bidder's qualifications and compliance with tender conditions, to be filled out electronically.

Hankedokument (HD)DOC
HD Pakkumuse kutse Parksepa sademeveesüsteem.... -- 38.5 KB

This document provides instructions for preparing and submitting a bid for the design and construction of the Parksepa stormwater system under a simplified procurement procedure.

HD Lisa 2-Tehniline kirjeldus (TK)DOC
Lisa 2_Tehniline kirjeldus (TK)Parksepa sadem... -- 25.1 KB

This technical specification outlines the requirements for the design and construction of the Parksepa stormwater system, which bidders must fulfill.

TK Lisa 2 Töömaa piirPDF
TK Lisa2_Töömaa_piir.pdf -- 8.0 MB

This document defines the boundaries of the work site for the Parksepa stormwater system design and construction project.

Dokumentų peržiūra

Prisiregistruokite, kad peržiūrėtumėte dokumentų santraukas ir analizę

75
Gerai

Konkurso kokybės įvertinimas

This tender for stormwater system design and construction in Parksepa is generally well-structured, with clear technical specifications and submission requirements. However, it lacks explicit sustainability considerations and relies on a simplified procurement procedure.

Įvertinimo detalės

Atitiktis teisės aktams75/100

The tender appears to comply with general public procurement regulations, including the use of a proper CPV code and a clear procedure. Deadlines are reasonable for the scope. No disputes are indicated. The procedure type (LM) suggests a simplified process, which is generally acceptable if applied correctly.

Aiškumas80/100

The description of the works is clear, and technical specifications are referenced. Requirements for submission and evaluation criteria are documented, although the evaluation criteria are stated as 'relative_weighting' without further detail on how this weighting is applied beyond the lowest price receiving maximum points.

Evaluation criteria could be more detailed regarding the 'relative_weighting' beyond price.
Užbaigtumas70/100

Most basic information is present, including value, duration, and deadlines. Key documents like technical specifications and cost forms are attached or referenced. However, the contract start date is not explicitly stated, and the financing condition is a general reference to the contract project.

Contract start date is not explicitly specified.
Financing condition is a general reference.
Sąžiningumas85/100

The tender allows for electronic submission and e-procurement, promoting accessibility. The estimated value is disclosed. Criteria are objective, focusing on total cost. There are no apparent requirements tailored to specific companies, suggesting a fair process.

Praktiškumas65/100

Electronic submission and e-procurement are supported. However, the contract start date is missing, and while financing is mentioned, specific details are not provided beyond a reference to the contract project. The duration is specified in months.

Contract start date is not specified.
Detailed financing information is absent.
Duomenų nuoseklumas90/100

Key fields such as title, reference, organization, and deadlines are populated. Dates are logical, and there are no indications of suspension or disputes. The tender status is '11', which typically signifies an active tender.

Tvarumas50/100

The tender does not explicitly mention any green procurement, social aspects, or innovation requirements. It is not indicated as EU funded, which often implies adherence to higher sustainability standards.

Lack of explicit green procurement criteria.
Absence of social or innovation considerations.

Privalumai

Clear technical specifications and requirements.
Electronic submission and e-procurement enabled.
Objective evaluation criterion (lowest price).
Well-defined CPV code and location.

Problemos

Absence of explicit sustainability criteria (green, social, innovation).
Missing contract start date.
Limited detail on financing conditions.

Rekomendacijos

1. Incorporate specific sustainability objectives (e.g., material choices, waste management) into the technical specifications.
2. Clearly state the contract start date or the conditions for its determination.
3. Provide more detailed information on financing arrangements.

AI įvertinimo peržiūra

Prisiregistruokite, kad peržiūrėtumėte visus reikalavimus ir analizę

Išsami kokybės balo analizė
Detali sub-balų analizė
Privalumų ir trūkumų įžvalgos
Strateginės rekomendacijos

Nereikia kreditinės kortelės • Sąranka per 2 minutes

Įtraukti į „Pipeline“