Atgal į konkursus

Inkontinencijos produktų pirkimas Otepės sveikatos centre

Atviras
Galutinis terminas
Liko 2 dienų
Kovas 05, 2026
Informacija apie sutartį
Kategorija
Tiekimas
Nuoroda
306037
Vertė
€115,000
Vieta
Estonia, Estija
Paskelbta
Vasaris 17, 2026
CPV kodas
Vertinimo kriterijai
Cost100%
Projekto grafikas

Konkursas paskelbtas

Vasaris 17, 2026

Klausimų pateikimo terminas

Vasaris 26, 2026

Pasiūlymų pateikimo terminas

Kovas 05, 2026

Konkurso atidarymas

Kovas 05, 2026

Sutarties pradžios data

Kovas 15, 2026

Laimėjimo tikimybėPRO
🔒
Atnaujinti į Professional
Peržiūrėkite savo apskaičiuotą laimėjimo tikimybę pagal istorinius duomenis.
Atnaujinti į Professional →
Pirkėjo analitikaPRO
🔒
Atrakinkite pirkėjo analitiką
Peržiūrėkite išlaidų modelius, pageidaujamas procedūras ir kita.
Atnaujinti į Professional →
Sektoriaus įžvalgosPRO
🔒
Atrakinkite sektoriaus įžvalgas
Peržiūrėkite vidutines laimėjimo kainas, konkurencijos lygius ir rinkos tendencijas.
Atnaujinti į Professional →
Biudžetas
€115,000
Trukmė
36 mėnesių
Vieta
Estonia
Tipas
Tiekimas
76
Kokybės įvertinimas/100
Gerai
Rinkos lyginamoji analizė
Vidutinė laimėjimo kaina
€92,792
Vidutinis pasiūlymų skaičius
2.2
Konkurencija
Žema
MVĮ laimėtojai
86%
3,220 išanalizuotų pirkimų skaičius

Originalus konkurso aprašymas

Pirkimo tikslas yra sudaryti pagrindų sutartį inkontinencijos produktų ir medicinos reikmenų pirkimui, remiantis pavadinimais ir aprašymais, pateiktais pirkimo dokumentų 1 priede.
Elektroninis pateikimas

Rizikos analizė

Prisijunkite, kad galėtumėte naudoti rizikos analizę.

Prisijungti

Laimėjimo strategija

Prisijunkite, kad galėtumėte naudoti laimėjimo strategijos rekomendacijas.

Prisijungti

Konkurentai

Atnaujinkite, kad matytumėte, kurios įmonės greičiausiai pateiks pasiūlymą šiam konkursui, remiantis istoriniais viešųjų pirkimų duomenimis.

Prisijungti

Reikalavimai ir kvalifikacija

10 reikalavimų 5 kategorijose

Pateikimas (4)
Privalomas (1)
Atitiktis (3)
Techninis (1)
Finansinis (1)
SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS4
--Submit the application form for participation to confirm interest (Annex 2).
--Submit the cost form (Annex 3), detailing product names, descriptions, and unit prices according to the contracting authority's list and estimated quantities.
--Adhere to the general conditions of the open procurement procedure, including specific submission requirements.
MANDATORY EXCLUSION GROUNDS1
--Confirm non-existence of exclusion grounds as per Public Procurement Act (criminal background, tax debts, sanctions).
ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS3
--(For joint bidders) Appoint a representative.
--(For joint bidders) Confirm joint and several liability.
--(For joint bidders) State if the submission is a joint bid.
TECHNICAL CAPABILITY REQUIREMENTS1
--Offered products must meet detailed technical requirements and standards for incontinence products and hospital supplies.
FINANCIAL REQUIREMENTS1
--Submit a competitive price, as bids will be evaluated solely on cost, with the lowest price receiving maximum points.

Reikalavimų peržiūra

Prisiregistruokite, kad peržiūrėtumėte visus reikalavimus ir analizę

Dokumentai

Yra 8 dokumentų su AI santraukomis

VastavustingimusedPDF
306037_vastavustingimused.pdf -- 3.0 KB

This document specifies the requirement for joint bidders to appoint a representative and submit a power of attorney, confirming their joint and several liability, and asks if it's a joint bid and if the power of attorney has been attached.

Hindamiskriteeriumid ja hinnatavad näitajadPDF
306037_hindamiskriteeriumid.pdf -- 2.8 KB

This document specifies that bids for the Otepää Health Centre's incontinence products procurement will be evaluated solely based on cost, with the lowest price receiving maximum points.

Hankepass täiendatavate selgitustegaPDF
306037_hankepass_taiendavate_selgitustega.pdf -- 70.8 KB

This document serves as an explanatory guide to the conditions and expected information for the European Single Procurement Document (ESPD) for the Otepää Health Centre's incontinence product procurement, intended for familiarization rather than direct submission.

Tehniline kirjeldusDOC
Lisa 1 Tehniline kirjeldus.doc -- 56.5 KB

This document details the technical requirements and standards for the incontinence products to be procured for the Otepää Health Center.

Riigihankes osalemise avaldusDOC
Lisa 2 Riigihankes osalemise avaldus.doc -- 33.0 KB

This document is an application form for participating in the tender, which the bidder must submit to confirm their intent to participate.

MaksumusvormXLS
Lisa 3 Maksumusvorm.xlsx -- 14.0 KB

This document is a pricing form where bidders must provide the names, descriptions, and unit prices of the offered incontinence products according to the contracting authority's list and estimated quantities.

HankepassDOC
Lisa 4 Hankepass.docx -- 18.1 KB

This document requires bidders to confirm they do not meet any of the exclusion criteria specified in the Public Procurement Act, such as criminal background, tax arrears, or sanctions.

RHADDOC
RHAD inko.docx -- 21.7 KB

This document outlines the general terms and conditions for the open procurement procedure for a framework agreement for incontinence products and hospital supplies for Otepää Tervisekeskus, including submission requirements and the contract period from 15.03.2026 to 14.03.2029.

Dokumentų peržiūra

Prisiregistruokite, kad peržiūrėtumėte dokumentų santraukas ir analizę

76
Gerai

Konkurso kokybės įvertinimas

This public procurement is generally well-structured and transparent, but requires clarification regarding the evaluation criteria. The tender provides comprehensive documentation and utilizes e-procurement, enhancing accessibility.

Įvertinimo detalės

Atitiktis teisės aktams75/100

The procedure type and CPV codes are clearly defined, and the submission period of 16 days is reasonable. However, a significant inconsistency exists between the stated 'relative_weighting' evaluation criteria in the basic information and the 'solely on cost' criterion detailed in Document 9 and AI-extracted requirements, posing a legal compliance risk.

Inconsistency in evaluation criteria description ('relative_weighting' vs. 'solely on cost')
Aiškumas80/100

The description of the procurement and its requirements are generally clear and well-documented. However, the conflicting information regarding the evaluation criteria significantly reduces overall clarity for potential bidders.

Inconsistency in evaluation criteria description
Užbaigtumas90/100

The tender is highly complete, providing all essential information such as title, reference, organization, deadlines, estimated value, and duration. All necessary documents are listed and summarized, ensuring bidders have access to comprehensive details.

Sąžiningumas85/100

The estimated value is disclosed, and the use of e-procurement ensures equal access for bidders. The evaluation criterion of 'lowest price' is objective and transparent, although the initial inconsistency with 'relative_weighting' could cause initial confusion. Requirements do not appear tailored to a specific company.

Initial inconsistency in evaluation criteria description
Praktiškumas75/100

Electronic submission is supported, and the contract start date and duration are clearly specified. While the opening place URL is provided, a direct URL to the tender documents would further enhance practicality for bidders.

No direct URL to tender documents provided in basic information
Duomenų nuoseklumas60/100

Most key fields are populated, and dates are logical and consistent. However, the direct contradiction between 'Evaluation Criteria: relative_weighting' and the detailed 'evaluated solely on cost' is a significant data inconsistency that could lead to confusion and potential challenges.

Inconsistency in evaluation criteria description ('relative_weighting' vs. 'solely on cost')
Tvarumas20/100

The tender does not include any explicit green procurement, social, or innovation criteria. While common for commodity procurements, this represents a missed opportunity to integrate broader sustainability objectives.

Absence of green procurement criteria
Absence of social criteria

Privalumai

Clear identification of goods and purpose (incontinence products and hospital supplies)
Comprehensive documentation provided, including technical specifications and required forms
Transparency in estimated value and use of e-procurement for accessibility
Clear timeline and contract duration
Objective evaluation criterion (lowest price) specified in detail within documents

Problemos

Significant inconsistency in evaluation criteria description ('relative_weighting' vs. 'solely on cost')
Lack of explicit sustainability, social, or innovation considerations
Minor ambiguity due to 'Value Classified: Yes' alongside a disclosed estimated value
Absence of a direct URL to tender documents in the basic information

Rekomendacijos

1. Clarify and ensure consistency in the stated evaluation criteria across all tender documents and characteristics to avoid ambiguity.
2. Consider incorporating sustainability or social responsibility clauses, where feasible, even for commodity procurements.
3. Provide a direct link to the tender documents for easier access and improved practicality.

AI įvertinimo peržiūra

Prisiregistruokite, kad peržiūrėtumėte visus reikalavimus ir analizę

Išsami kokybės balo analizė
Detali sub-balų analizė
Privalumų ir trūkumų įžvalgos
Strateginės rekomendacijos

Nereikia kreditinės kortelės • Sąranka per 2 minutes

Įtraukti į „Pipeline“