Atgal į konkursus

Alfa-galaktozidazės (A16AB03) ir beta-galaktozidazės (A16AB04) vaistų pirkimas

Atviras
Galutinis terminas
Liko 9 dienų
Kovas 12, 2026
Informacija apie sutartį
Kategorija
Tiekimas
Nuoroda
305152
Vertė
€1,007,518
Vieta
Estonia, Estija
Paskelbta
Vasaris 05, 2026
CPV kodas
Vertinimo kriterijai
Lowest total cost100%
Projekto grafikas

Konkursas paskelbtas

Vasaris 05, 2026

Klausimų pateikimo terminas

Kovas 05, 2026

Pasiūlymų pateikimo terminas

Kovas 12, 2026

Konkurso atidarymas

Kovas 12, 2026

Laimėjimo tikimybėPRO
🔒
Atnaujinti į Professional
Peržiūrėkite savo apskaičiuotą laimėjimo tikimybę pagal istorinius duomenis.
Atnaujinti į Professional →
Pirkėjo analitikaPRO
🔒
Atrakinkite pirkėjo analitiką
Peržiūrėkite išlaidų modelius, pageidaujamas procedūras ir kita.
Atnaujinti į Professional →
Sektoriaus įžvalgosPRO
🔒
Atrakinkite sektoriaus įžvalgas
Peržiūrėkite vidutines laimėjimo kainas, konkurencijos lygius ir rinkos tendencijas.
Atnaujinti į Professional →
Biudžetas
€1,007,518
Trukmė
Nenurodyta
Vieta
Estonia
Tipas
Tiekimas
79
Kokybės įvertinimas/100
Gerai
Rinkos lyginamoji analizė
Vidutinė laimėjimo kaina
€92,792
Vidutinis pasiūlymų skaičius
2.2
Konkurencija
Žema
MVĮ laimėtojai
86%
3,220 išanalizuotų pirkimų skaičius

Originalus konkurso aprašymas

Viešojo pirkimo tikslas – sudaryti pagrindų susitarimus alfa-galaktozidazės (A16AB03) ir beta-galaktozidazės (A16AB04) vaistams pirkti SA Pärnu Haigla iki 2028-03-31. Techninė specifikacija ir prognozuojami kiekiai pateikiami HD 1 priede. Perkančioji organizacija užsako produktus pagal faktinį poreikį, kuris gali skirtis nuo prognozuojamų kiekių.
Elektroninis pateikimas

Rizikos analizė

Prisijunkite, kad galėtumėte naudoti rizikos analizę.

Prisijungti

Laimėjimo strategija

Prisijunkite, kad galėtumėte naudoti laimėjimo strategijos rekomendacijas.

Prisijungti

Konkurentai

Atnaujinkite, kad matytumėte, kurios įmonės greičiausiai pateiks pasiūlymą šiam konkursui, remiantis istoriniais viešųjų pirkimų duomenimis.

Prisijungti

Reikalavimai ir kvalifikacija

15 reikalavimų 5 kategorijose

Pateikimas (7)
Privalomas (2)
Atitiktis (3)
Techninis (2)
Finansinis (1)
SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS7
--The bid must be submitted by 2026-03-12 10:00:00.
--The tenderer must complete and submit the European Single Procurement Document (ESPD) electronically.
--The tenderer must complete and submit the tender submission application (Annex 3 Form I).
MANDATORY EXCLUSION GROUNDS2
--The tenderer must not fall under any exclusion grounds, which must be declared in the European Single Procurement Document (ESPD).
--The tenderer must submit an anti-sanctions declaration.
ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS3
--The tenderer must fulfill and declare qualification requirements in the European Single Procurement Document (ESPD).
--The tenderer must confirm compliance with the tender conditions and qualification requirements in the tender submission application.
--The tenderer must agree to the terms of the draft framework agreement.
TECHNICAL CAPABILITY REQUIREMENTS2
--The tenderer must provide technical data for the medicines alfaagalsidase (A16AB03) and betaagalsidase (A16AB04) according to the technical specification.
--The tenderer must be capable of supplying the medicines alfaagalsidase and betaagalsidase according to the conditions described in the tender documents.
FINANCIAL REQUIREMENTS1
--The tenderer must submit unit prices for the medicines alfaagalsidase and betaagalsidase for two years on the price quotation form.

Reikalavimų peržiūra

Prisiregistruokite, kad peržiūrėtumėte visus reikalavimus ir analizę

Dokumentai

Yra 8 dokumentų su AI santraukomis

VastavustingimusedPDF
305152_vastavustingimused.pdf -- 18.0 KB

This document outlines the compliance conditions for the procurement of alpha-galactosidase and beta-galactosidase medicines, requiring bidders to submit an application, power of attorney (if applicable), a declaration against sanctions, and the technical specification and price offer form.

HD lisa 1 Tehniline kirjeldus ja hinnapakkumuse vormXLS
HD lisa 1 Tehniline kirjeldus ja hinnapakkumu... -- 17.9 KB

This document is a price offer form requiring bidders to submit technical specifications and unit prices for alfaagalsidase and betaagalsidase drugs for a two-year period, including fields for bidder information.

HD lisa 3 vorm I - AvaldusDOC
HD lisa 3 vorm I - Avaldus.docx -- 91.6 KB

This form is an application for tender submission, requiring bidder details and confirmations of compliance with tender conditions and qualification criteria.

Hindamiskriteeriumid ja hinnatavad näitajadPDF
305152_hindamiskriteeriumid.pdf -- 5.3 KB

This document outlines the evaluation criteria and methodology for the procurement of alfaagalsidase and betaagalsidase medicines, where the sole evaluation criterion is the lowest total cost (with a 100% weighting).

Hankepass täiendatavate selgitustegaPDF
305152_hankepass_taiendavate_selgitustega.pdf -- 70.6 KB

This document serves as an explanatory guide for the European Single Procurement Document (ESPD), detailing the contracting authority's qualification requirements and exclusion grounds that bidders must declare electronically.

Hankedokument (HD)DOC
Hankedokument.docx -- 93.9 KB

This document outlines the open procurement procedure for the purchase of alpha-galactosidase (A16AB03) and beta-galactosidase (A16AB04) medicines, detailing the general terms of the tender.

HD lisa 2 Raamlepingu projektPDF
HD lisa 2 Raamlepingu projekt.pdf -- 4.2 MB

This document is a draft framework agreement outlining the terms and legal framework for the procurement of alpha-galactosidase and beta-galactosidase drugs.

HD lisa 3 PakkumusvormidDOC
HD lisa 3 Pakkumusvormid.docx -- 95.6 KB

This document contains required tender submission forms, including a power of attorney for signing the tender and an application for participation in the procurement procedure with bidder details.

Dokumentų peržiūra

Prisiregistruokite, kad peržiūrėtumėte dokumentų santraukas ir analizę

79
Gerai

Konkurso kokybės įvertinimas

This tender for specific pharmaceutical products demonstrates good clarity and fairness, leveraging e-procurement effectively. However, it presents a notable inconsistency regarding evaluation criteria and lacks explicit sustainability considerations.

Įvertinimo detalės

Atitiktis teisės aktams85/100

The tender adheres to legal requirements with reasonable deadlines (35 days), appropriate CPV codes, and no detected disputes. The use of ESPD and an open procedure aligns with national regulations. The generic procedure type code is a minor point.

Aiškumas70/100

While the overall description and requirements are well-documented and understandable, there is a significant inconsistency regarding the evaluation criteria. The basic information states 'relative_weighting,' but the dedicated document specifies 'lowest total cost (100% weighting),' which can cause confusion for bidders.

Inconsistency in evaluation criteria description (relative_weighting vs. 100% lowest cost).
Užbaigtumas85/100

The tender is largely complete, providing all basic information, estimated value, and clear deadlines. The duration of the framework agreement until 31.03.2028 is specified in the description, and all necessary documents and forms are attached.

Sąžiningumas90/100

This tender scores highly on fairness, offering full document access, disclosing the estimated value, and providing reasonable deadlines for preparation. The use of e-procurement and objective 'lowest total cost' evaluation criteria ensures equal access and transparency. Requirements appear generic for the product type and not tailored.

Praktiškumas80/100

The tender is practical, supporting electronic submission and e-procurement. The opening place URL is provided, and the duration of the framework agreement is clear. The absence of an explicit contract start date is a minor detail.

Duomenų nuoseklumas70/100

Key fields are populated, and dates are logical. However, the inconsistency between the stated 'relative_weighting' evaluation criteria in the basic characteristics and the 'lowest total cost (100% weighting)' in the evaluation document is a notable data inconsistency. The 'Value Classified: Yes' while the value is disclosed is also a minor inconsistency.

Inconsistent description of evaluation criteria.
Contradiction between 'Value Classified: Yes' and disclosed estimated value.
Tvarumas40/100

The tender does not explicitly include green procurement, social aspects, or innovation focus. While common for specific medical supplies, this represents a missed opportunity to integrate broader sustainability considerations into the procurement process.

No explicit green procurement criteria.
No explicit social criteria.

Privalumai

Comprehensive documentation provided, including ESPD guide, draft contract, and detailed forms.
Strong commitment to e-procurement and electronic submission, enhancing accessibility and efficiency.
Clear and reasonable submission deadline, allowing sufficient time for preparation.
Transparency in disclosing the estimated value and using objective evaluation criteria (lowest cost).
Clear definition of the procurement objective and contract duration for the framework agreement.

Problemos

Inconsistency in evaluation criteria: The basic information states 'relative_weighting,' while the dedicated document specifies 'lowest total cost (100% weighting).'
Generic procedure type codes (Type A, Procedure A) in the basic information, although clarified in the main tender document.
Lack of explicit sustainability, social, or innovation criteria, which is a missed opportunity for modern procurement practices.
Contradiction between 'Value Classified: Yes' and the disclosed estimated value.
Contract start date is not explicitly stated, though the end date of the framework agreement is clear.

Rekomendacijos

1. Rectify the inconsistency regarding evaluation criteria by ensuring all tender documents and metadata consistently reflect either 'relative weighting' with specified criteria or 'lowest total cost.'
2. Consider integrating relevant sustainability criteria, such as environmentally friendly packaging or logistics, where feasible for pharmaceutical procurement.
3. Provide a more specific procedure type in the basic metadata to enhance clarity and compliance with reporting standards.

AI įvertinimo peržiūra

Prisiregistruokite, kad peržiūrėtumėte visus reikalavimus ir analizę

Išsami kokybės balo analizė
Detali sub-balų analizė
Privalumų ir trūkumų įžvalgos
Strateginės rekomendacijos

Nereikia kreditinės kortelės • Sąranka per 2 minutes

Įtraukti į „Pipeline“