Atgal į konkursus

Väimelos sveikatos centro automobilių stovėjimo aikštelės projektavimas ir statyba

Uždarytas
Galutinis terminas
Liko 0 dienų
Kovas 02, 2026
Informacija apie sutartį
Kategorija
Statyba
Nuoroda
304351
Vertė
€80,000
Vieta
Estonia, Estija
Paskelbta
Vasaris 03, 2026
Organizacija
CPV kodas
Vertinimo kriterijai
Total cost of construction works.100%
Projekto grafikas

Konkursas paskelbtas

Vasaris 03, 2026

Klausimų pateikimo terminas

Vasaris 23, 2026

Pasiūlymų pateikimo terminas

Kovas 02, 2026

Konkurso atidarymas

Kovas 02, 2026

Laimėjimo tikimybėPRO
🔒
Atnaujinti į Professional
Peržiūrėkite savo apskaičiuotą laimėjimo tikimybę pagal istorinius duomenis.
Atnaujinti į Professional →
Pirkėjo analitikaPRO
🔒
Atrakinkite pirkėjo analitiką
Peržiūrėkite išlaidų modelius, pageidaujamas procedūras ir kita.
Atnaujinti į Professional →
Sektoriaus įžvalgosPRO
🔒
Atrakinkite sektoriaus įžvalgas
Peržiūrėkite vidutines laimėjimo kainas, konkurencijos lygius ir rinkos tendencijas.
Atnaujinti į Professional →
Biudžetas
€80,000
Trukmė
5 mėnesių
Vieta
Estonia
Tipas
Statyba
69
Kokybės įvertinimas/100
Gerai
Rinkos lyginamoji analizė
Vidutinė laimėjimo kaina
€524,963
Vidutinis pasiūlymų skaičius
4.7
Konkurencija
Vidutinė
MVĮ laimėtojai
94%
5,932 išanalizuotų pirkimų skaičius

Originalus konkurso aprašymas

Užsakovo tikslas yra rekonstruoti ir išplėsti Väimelos sveikatos centro automobilių stovėjimo aikštelę, padaryti pastato lauko erdvę atitinkančią prieinamumo reikalavimus ir užtikrinti kuo patogesnį jos naudojimą lankytojams (įskaitant specialių poreikių turinčius lankytojus).
Finansuojama ESElektroninis pateikimas

Rizikos analizė

Prisijunkite, kad galėtumėte naudoti rizikos analizę.

Prisijungti

Laimėjimo strategija

Prisijunkite, kad galėtumėte naudoti laimėjimo strategijos rekomendacijas.

Prisijungti

Konkurentai

Atnaujinkite, kad matytumėte, kurios įmonės greičiausiai pateiks pasiūlymą šiam konkursui, remiantis istoriniais viešųjų pirkimų duomenimis.

Prisijungti

Reikalavimai ir kvalifikacija

11 reikalavimų 5 kategorijose

Pateikimas (6)
Privalomas (1)
Atitiktis (1)
Techninis (2)
Finansinis (1)
SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS6
--The bid must be submitted according to the instructions for the open procurement procedure.
--The bid cost must be presented according to the specified structure.
--The bid must be submitted using the provided cost form (Maksumuse vorm_Väimela TK parkla.xlsx), specifying unit prices and total cost for different work stages.
MANDATORY EXCLUSION GROUNDS1
--The tenderer and its first-tier subcontractors must not have grounds for exclusion related to criminal offenses or other ethical violations as specified in the subcontractor control conditions.
ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS1
--Joint tenderers must submit a power of attorney.
TECHNICAL CAPABILITY REQUIREMENTS2
--The design and construction of the parking lot must ensure universal accessibility, considering the needs of people with various disabilities and factors affecting accessibility.
--The bid must comply with the technical requirements and specifications for the design and construction of the Väimela Health Centre parking lot.
FINANCIAL REQUIREMENTS1
--No explicit financial capability requirements (e.g., turnover, financial ratios) for the bidder are stated in the document summaries.

Reikalavimų peržiūra

Prisiregistruokite, kad peržiūrėtumėte visus reikalavimus ir analizę

Dokumentai

Yra 8 dokumentų su AI santraukomis

Alltöövõtjate kontrollimise tingimused lepingu täitmise etapisPDF
304351_alltoovotjate_kontrollimise_tingimused... -- 20.7 KB

This document outlines the conditions for controlling subcontractors during the contract execution phase, focusing on exclusion grounds for first-tier subcontractors related to criminal offenses and other ethical violations, and requires the tenderer to provide answers regarding these.

VastavustingimusedPDF
304351_vastavustingimused.pdf -- 7.4 KB

This document details tender compliance conditions, including requirements for joint bids, the mandatory structure for submitting tender costs, and general principles for tender submission and equivalence.

HD Lisa 1_Maksumuse vormXLS
Maksumuse vorm_Väimela TK parkla.xlsx -- 16.9 KB

This is a cost form for submitting a tender for the design and construction of the Väimela Health Centre parking lot, requiring bidders to specify unit prices and total costs for various work stages.

Hindamiskriteeriumid ja hinnatavad näitajadPDF
304351_hindamiskriteeriumid.pdf -- 3.2 KB

This document specifies that bids for the design and construction of Väimela Health Center's parking lot will be evaluated solely based on the total cost of construction works, with the lowest-priced bid receiving the maximum score.

Hankepass täiendatavate selgitustegaPDF
304351_hankepass_taiendavate_selgitustega.pdf -- 65.3 KB

This document is an explanatory European Single Procurement Document (ESPD) outlining the qualification requirements and exclusion grounds for the Väimela Health Center parking lot design and construction tender, intended for review, not for submission.

Hankedokument (HD)DOC
Hankedokument HD- Väimela Tervisekeskuse park... -- 37.8 KB

This is the tender document for Võru Rural Municipality Government's public procurement "Design and Construction of Väimela Health Center Parking Lot," providing instructions for preparing a bid in an open tender procedure.

HD Lisa 2-Tehniline kirjeldus (TK)DOC
Tehniline kirjeldus (TK)_Väimela TK parkla.do... -- 26.8 KB

This document outlines the technical requirements and specifications for the design and construction of the Väimela Health Center parking lot.

TK Lisa 3 - ligipääsetavuse hinnangPDF
TK Lisa 3 - ligipääsetavuse hinnang.pdf -- 1.7 MB

This document is an accessibility assessment for Väimela Health Centre, detailing the needs of people with various disabilities and factors affecting accessibility to ensure universal access in the design and construction of the parking lot.

Dokumentų peržiūra

Prisiregistruokite, kad peržiūrėtumėte dokumentų santraukas ir analizę

69
Gerai

Konkurso kokybės įvertinimas

This tender is generally well-structured with clear basic information and a strong focus on accessibility. However, a critical inconsistency in the stated evaluation criteria significantly impacts its clarity and data consistency.

Įvertinimo detalės

Atitiktis teisės aktams75/100

The tender appears largely compliant with legal requirements, including reasonable deadlines and proper CPV codes. The 'Negotiation Allowed' characteristic for an 'Open Procedure' is a minor ambiguity that could warrant clarification.

'Negotiation Allowed' characteristic for an 'Open Procedure' (Type A) is unusual and potentially ambiguous.
Aiškumas60/100

While the project description and individual requirements are clear, there is a direct contradiction between the stated 'relative_weighting' evaluation criteria in the characteristics and the document specifying 'solely based on total cost'. This is a significant clarity issue.

Direct contradiction in evaluation criteria (relative weighting vs. lowest price only).
Užbaigtumas70/100

Most essential information is provided, including basic details, value, and duration. However, the lack of explicit financial capability requirements for bidders and the inability to analyze key technical and contractual documents (due to file formats) represent minor gaps.

No explicit financial capability requirements for bidders.
Key technical and contractual documents (e.g., draft contract, detailed project plans) are in unanalyzed .zip/.png formats, limiting full content assessment.
Sąžiningumas80/100

The tender promotes fairness through full document access, disclosed value, reasonable deadlines, and e-procurement. The evaluation criteria, if 'lowest price only', are objective, though the contradiction noted under clarity slightly impacts transparency.

Contradiction in evaluation criteria slightly impacts transparency.
Praktiškumas75/100

Electronic submission is supported, and the duration is clearly specified. While a contract start date isn't explicit, the overall process appears practical. Financing conditions are mentioned but not fully detailed.

Financing conditions are mentioned but lack full detail.
Contract start date is not explicitly stated.
Duomenų nuoseklumas50/100

There is a critical inconsistency regarding the evaluation criteria, with 'relative_weighting' stated in characteristics but 'lowest price only' in the evaluation document. This is a major flaw in data consistency.

Critical contradiction in evaluation criteria (relative weighting vs. lowest price only).
Inconsistency between 'Open Procedure' and 'Negotiation Allowed' characteristic.
Tvarumas60/100

The tender includes a strong social aspect by emphasizing universal accessibility for people with disabilities. However, it lacks explicit green procurement or innovation-focused criteria, as noted by automated checks.

Lack of explicit green procurement criteria.
No specific innovation focus.

Privalumai

Clear project description and objectives, including universal accessibility.
Comprehensive set of supporting documents provided.
Electronic submission and e-procurement enabled.
Value disclosed and reasonable submission deadline.
Strong social aspect through accessibility requirements.

Problemos

Critical contradiction in evaluation criteria (relative weighting vs. lowest price only).
Lack of explicit financial capability requirements for bidders.
Key technical and contractual documents are in unanalyzed formats (.zip, .png).
Ambiguity regarding 'Negotiation Allowed' in an 'Open Procedure'.
Absence of explicit green procurement or innovation criteria.

Rekomendacijos

1. Immediately clarify and correct the contradictory statements regarding evaluation criteria to ensure transparency and avoid bidder confusion.
2. Consider adding explicit financial capability requirements to mitigate risks for a construction project.
3. Provide summaries or accessible formats for key technical and contractual documents to enhance transparency and completeness.

AI įvertinimo peržiūra

Prisiregistruokite, kad peržiūrėtumėte visus reikalavimus ir analizę

Išsami kokybės balo analizė
Detali sub-balų analizė
Privalumų ir trūkumų įžvalgos
Strateginės rekomendacijos

Nereikia kreditinės kortelės • Sąranka per 2 minutes

Įtraukti į „Pipeline“