KT programos turinio ir užduočių, pritaikytų skaitmenizavimui, sukūrimas (KVALIFIKACIJOS TOBULINIMO PROGRAMOS „ATEITIES KARJERAI BŪTINŲ KOMPETENCIJŲ UGDYMAS ŠVIETIMO PRAKTIKOJE“ )

This tender for developing digital content for a qualification program is generally well-structured but lacks detail on evaluation criteria and financial information, impacting its completeness and practicality. The direct mention of EU funding positively impacts its sustainability score.

The tender follows EU procurement directives (2014/24/EU) and uses a standard open procedure. Key information like CPV code and organization are present. The submission deadline is set but the 'missing reveal date' is a minor concern regarding transparency of the opening process. No explicit disputes are reported.

The core service description is understandable (creating digital content for a 40 academic hour qualification program). However, there's a significant lack of clarity regarding evaluation criteria, which are not specified. Requirements for exclusion, eligibility, technical, and financial capabilities are also missing from the provided extract, making it difficult for potential bidders to fully understand the scope of requirements.

Basic information such as title, reference, organization, and contract duration (7 months) are provided. However, the estimated value is not disclosed, which is a significant omission. Crucially, many core requirements (exclusion grounds, eligibility, technical, financial, submission requirements) are listed as 'No information provided', severely impacting the completeness of the tender documentation for potential bidders.

The tender is listed as 'E-Procurement', suggesting a fair digital process. Access to documents appears to be provided (18 total). The lack of disclosed estimated value could be a concern for fair bidding, but there are no overtly tailored requirements suggesting favoritism towards specific companies. The objective criteria for evaluation are unfortunately missing.

While the tender is 'E-Procurement', the lack of explicit mention of e-submission in the requirements and the absence of a document URL for direct access is a drawback. The contract start date is not specified, and financing information is missing. The contract duration of 7 months is clear.

Key fields such as title, reference, organization, CPV code, and deadlines are populated. The tender status is 'active'. There are no reported disputes or suspensions. The dates provided (Submission Deadline, Opening Date) appear logical in sequence. The value is not disclosed, which is an omission rather than an inconsistency.

The tender explicitly states 'EU Funded', which is a positive indicator for the sustainability category. However, there is no mention of green procurement criteria, social aspects, or innovation, leading to a moderate score in this area.