AI reikalavimų analizė šiam konkursui dar nepasiekiama.
Reikalavimai bus sugeneruoti automatiškai, kai bus apdoroti konkurso dokumentai.
Yra 14 dokumentų su AI santraukomis
No content extracted
No content extracted
No content extracted
No content extracted
No content extracted
No content extracted
No content extracted
No content extracted
No content extracted
No content extracted
No content extracted
No content extracted
Šis dokumentas yra Lietuvos inovacijų centro pirkimo skelbimas dėl mokymams skirtų patalpų nuomos ir mokymų dalyvių kavos/arbatos pertraukų paslaugų Vilniuje, su pasiūlymų pateikimo terminu iki 2026 m. vasario 25 d.
Šiame dokumente pateikiama XML struktūra, apibrėžianti supaprastinto atvirojo konkurso pasiūlymo teikimo reikalavimus, įskaitant privalomą failo įkėlimą visapusiškam pasiūlymo įvertinimui.
Prisiregistruokite, kad peržiūrėtumėte dokumentų santraukas ir analizę
This tender provides clear requirements and evaluation criteria but suffers from significant data inconsistencies, particularly regarding the submission method, and lacks transparency due to an undisclosed estimated value.
The tender defines an open procedure and uses an appropriate CPV code. Mandatory exclusion grounds are referenced, indicating adherence to basic procurement law. No disputes or suspensions are reported.
The tender description is clear, and the AI-extracted requirements are well-defined and understandable. The evaluation criterion ("lowest price") is explicitly stated in the XML document, enhancing transparency.
Basic information like title, reference, organization, description, deadlines, and duration are provided. Location information is also present. However, the estimated value and liable person are not disclosed. While 14 documents are listed, most lack extracted content, limiting a full assessment of their detail.
The evaluation criteria ("lowest price") are objective and transparent. Requirements appear generic and not tailored. However, the non-disclosure of the estimated value hinders fair competition by preventing bidders from aligning their offers with the budget. The contradiction regarding e-procurement (E-Procurement characteristic vs. "offline envelope" submission) raises concerns about equal access.
Practicality is significantly hampered by the conflicting information regarding the submission method; while "E-Procurement" is listed, the XML document specifies an "offline envelope" submission, and automated checks indicate "No e-submission". This creates confusion and potential logistical challenges for bidders. The absence of a specific contract start date and financing details (estimated value) further reduces practicality.
There are several missing key fields, including the estimated value, liable person, and the tender's reveal date. A major inconsistency exists between the "E-Procurement" characteristic and the "offline envelope" submission method mentioned in the XML and automated checks.
The tender does not include any specific criteria or mentions related to green procurement, social aspects, or innovation. It is also not indicated as EU-funded.
Prisiregistruokite, kad peržiūrėtumėte visus reikalavimus ir analizę
Nereikia kreditinės kortelės • Sąranka per 2 minutes
Prisijunkite, kad galėtumėte naudoti laimėjimo strategijos rekomendacijas.
PrisijungtiLoading competitor predictions...
Sveiki! Aš esu Jūsų AI asistentas, skirtas šiam konkursui. Galiu padėti Jums suprasti reikalavimus, terminus, tinkamumo kriterijus ir pateikti strateginių įžvalgų.
Nereikia kreditinės kortelės