Atgal į konkursus

P­2026/14290 Autobusų sustojimo stotelių...naujos statybos aprašo parengimas...naujos statybos

Atviras
Galutinis terminas
Liko 17 dienų
Kovas 20, 2026
Informacija apie sutartį
Kategorija
Kita
Nuoroda
6529004
Vertė
Neatskleista
Vieta
Klaipeda County, Lietuva
Paskelbta
Vasaris 23, 2026
CPV kodas
Projekto grafikas

Konkursas paskelbtas

Vasaris 13, 2026

Klausimų pateikimo terminas

Kovas 13, 2026

Pasiūlymų pateikimo terminas

Kovas 20, 2026

Konkurso atidarymas

Kovas 20, 2026

Laimėjimo tikimybėPRO
🔒
Atnaujinti į Professional
Peržiūrėkite savo apskaičiuotą laimėjimo tikimybę pagal istorinius duomenis.
Atnaujinti į Professional →
Pirkėjo analitikaPRO
🔒
Atrakinkite pirkėjo analitiką
Peržiūrėkite išlaidų modelius, pageidaujamas procedūras ir kita.
Atnaujinti į Professional →
Sektoriaus įžvalgosPRO
🔒
Atrakinkite sektoriaus įžvalgas
Peržiūrėkite vidutines laimėjimo kainas, konkurencijos lygius ir rinkos tendencijas.
Atnaujinti į Professional →
Biudžetas
Neatskleista
Trukmė
10 mėnesių
Vieta
Klaipeda County
Tipas
Kita
70
Kokybės įvertinimas/100
Gerai
Rinkos lyginamoji analizė
Vidutinė laimėjimo kaina
€131,412
Vidutinis pasiūlymų skaičius
3.9
Konkurencija
Vidutinė
MVĮ laimėtojai
98%
2,076 išanalizuotų pirkimų skaičius

Originalus konkurso aprašymas

Autobusų sustojimo stotelės su paviljonu Klaipėdos raj., Kunkių k., Zeigių g., naujos statybos aprašo
Žaliasis pirkimasFinansuojama ES

Rizikos analizė

Prisijunkite, kad galėtumėte naudoti rizikos analizę.

Prisijungti

Laimėjimo strategija

Prisijunkite, kad galėtumėte naudoti laimėjimo strategijos rekomendacijas.

Prisijungti

Konkurentai

Atnaujinkite, kad matytumėte, kurios įmonės greičiausiai pateiks pasiūlymą šiam konkursui, remiantis istoriniais viešųjų pirkimų duomenimis.

Prisijungti

Reikalavimai ir kvalifikacija

AI reikalavimų analizė šiam konkursui dar nepasiekiama.

Reikalavimai bus sugeneruoti automatiškai, kai bus apdoroti konkurso dokumentai.

Dokumentai

Yra 7 dokumentų su AI santraukomis

Pirkimo bendrosios sąlygosDOC
26 02 12 _ Pirkimo bendrosios sąlygos.docx

This document defines key terms and abbreviations relevant to the procurement process, including definitions for participants, contracting authority, and various types of agreements.

Pirkimo specialiosios sąlygosDOC
26 02 12 _ Pirkimo specialiosios sąlygos.docx

This document details the special procurement conditions for design services of new bus stops in Klaipėda district, including general information, procurement principles, and contact details for bidders.

Sutarties projektasDOC
26 02 12 _ Sutarties projektas.docx

This document is a draft service procurement contract outlining the general and special conditions for preparing new construction descriptions and technical projects for bus stops in Klaipėda district.

Techninė specifikacija (I pirkimo dalis)PDF
2026 01 _Kunkiu k.– aprasas (1) (2).pdf

This document outlines the technical specifications for preparing a new construction description for a bus stop with a pavilion in Klaipėda district, detailing the scope of design services and required standards.

Techninė specifikacija (II pirkimo dalis)PDF
26 01 06_TS_Svencelė techninis darbo proj. – ...

This document outlines the technical specifications for the design and supervision services required for the new construction of a bus stop with a turning loop, driver rest infrastructure, canopy, and sanitary facilities in Svencelė, Klaipėda district.

espd-request.pdfPDF
espd-request.pdf -- 79.8 KB

This document outlines the European Single Procurement Document (ESPD) requirements, detailing the qualification criteria and information bidders must provide to demonstrate their eligibility for the engineering design services tender for a bus stop.

NoticePDF
Notice_6529004.pdf

Šiame dokumente pateikiamas Klaipėdos rajono savivaldybės administracijos skelbimas apie atvirą viešąjį pirkimą inžinerinio projektavimo paslaugoms, skirtoms naujai autobusų stotelės su paviljonu ir galinės/pradinės stotelės su apsisukimo žiedu statybai Klaipėdos rajone.

Dokumentų peržiūra

Prisiregistruokite, kad peržiūrėtumėte dokumentų santraukas ir analizę

70
Gerai

Konkurso kokybės įvertinimas

This tender presents a generally compliant and well-documented procurement for engineering design services, benefiting from EU funding and e-procurement. However, the undisclosed estimated value and the critical absence of explicit evaluation criteria significantly hinder transparency and fairness for potential bidders.

Įvertinimo detalės

Atitiktis teisės aktams75/100

The tender specifies an open procedure compliant with EU directives (2014/24/ES), provides appropriate CPV and NUTS codes, and lists mandatory exclusion grounds. It is EU Funded, suggesting adherence to broader EU procurement principles. However, the explicit absence of evaluation criteria in the summary is a legal transparency concern, though these are likely detailed in the full tender documents.

Missing explicit evaluation criteria in the summary
Aiškumas65/100

The description is somewhat brief but supplemented by CPV and AI-extracted requirements for eligibility and technical capability, which are generally clear. However, the critical absence of explicitly stated evaluation criteria significantly reduces the clarity for bidders on how their proposals will be assessed. The financial requirement is too generic.

Missing explicit evaluation criteria
Generic financial requirements
Užbaigtumas70/100

The tender includes all basic identifying information, contact details, deadlines, duration, and location. A comprehensive set of 10 documents, including general/special conditions, technical specifications (divided into parts), and a draft contract, are provided. The major omission is the undisclosed estimated value, which is crucial for bidders. Evaluation criteria are also flagged as missing from the summary.

Estimated value not disclosed
Missing explicit evaluation criteria in the summary
Sąžiningumas60/100

The tender benefits from being an open procedure, supporting e-procurement, and being divided into parts, which generally promotes fair access. Requirements for eligibility and technical capability appear generic and not tailored. However, the undisclosed estimated value and the critical absence of explicit evaluation criteria severely undermine transparency and fairness, making it difficult for bidders to prepare competitive and relevant offers.

Estimated value not disclosed
Missing explicit evaluation criteria
Praktiškumas80/100

The tender supports e-procurement, which enhances accessibility and ease of submission. The contract duration is clearly specified, and financing as 'EU Funded' is indicated. While a specific contract start date is not explicitly stated, this is a minor detail. The availability of all documents is practical for bidders.

Contract start date not explicitly known
Duomenų nuoseklumas90/100

Most key fields are populated, and the dates provided are logical and consistent. There are no reported disputes or suspensions. The minor inconsistency between 'E-Procurement' characteristic and 'No e-submission' automated check result is assumed to be an error in the automated check's interpretation, given the explicit characteristic.

Tvarumas30/100

The tender does not explicitly include green procurement criteria, social aspects, or an innovation focus, as indicated by the automated checks. While it is EU Funded, which often implies higher standards, these are not translated into specific requirements within the tender documentation summary. This represents a missed opportunity for a public project.

No explicit green procurement criteria
No explicit social criteria

Privalumai

Clear legal procedure type and compliance with EU directives
Comprehensive set of tender documents provided
E-procurement enabled and project divided into parts, promoting access
Detailed contact information for liable person
EU Funded, suggesting higher standards and oversight

Problemos

Estimated value is not disclosed, hindering fair competition
Evaluation criteria are not explicitly specified, impacting clarity and fairness
Financial requirements are generic and lack specific metrics
Absence of explicit sustainability, social, or innovation criteria
Brief project description in the summary, though clarified by other details

Rekomendacijos

1. Disclose the estimated value to ensure transparency and enable more informed bidding.
2. Clearly define and publish all evaluation criteria to enhance fairness and clarity for bidders.
3. Integrate specific sustainability, social, and innovation criteria, especially given the EU funding.

AI įvertinimo peržiūra

Prisiregistruokite, kad peržiūrėtumėte visus reikalavimus ir analizę

Išsami kokybės balo analizė
Detali sub-balų analizė
Privalumų ir trūkumų įžvalgos
Strateginės rekomendacijos

Nereikia kreditinės kortelės • Sąranka per 2 minutes

Įtraukti į „Pipeline“