DIDELIŲ GABARITŲ ATLIEKŲ SURINKIMO AIKŠTELĖS SU DAIKTŲ KEITIMOSI STOTELE

This tender exhibits significant deficiencies in clarity, completeness, and fairness due to undisclosed estimated value, missing specific requirements, and a critical absence of evaluation criteria, despite being EU-funded and promoting green procurement.

Legal compliance is moderate due to the missing tender reveal date, undisclosed estimated value, and a significant contradiction regarding the tender's status (active vs. suspended). However, the procedure type and CPV codes are clearly defined, and it references EU directives.

Clarity is poor due to the critical absence of specific mandatory exclusion grounds, eligibility, technical capability, and financial requirements. Furthermore, no evaluation criteria are specified, making it extremely difficult for bidders to understand how their proposals will be assessed.

Completeness is poor, largely mirroring the clarity issues. The estimated value is not disclosed, and crucial details such as specific eligibility, technical, financial requirements, and evaluation criteria are explicitly stated as not detailed or specified. This leaves significant gaps in the tender documentation.

Fairness is poor due to the undisclosed estimated value and, most critically, the complete absence of specified evaluation criteria. This lack of transparency makes it impossible for bidders to understand the basis of award, severely undermining the objectivity and fairness of the process. The lack of detailed requirements also creates ambiguity.

Practicality is good. The tender supports e-procurement, the contract duration is clearly specified, and financing information (EU Funded) is available. Minor issues include the contract start date not being known and no explicit document URL provided (though implied by document listing). There is a contradiction on e-submission, but 'E-Procurement' is listed as a characteristic.

Data consistency is poor, primarily due to a major contradiction between the tender's 'active' status and an automated check indicating it is 'suspended'. Additionally, key fields like 'Estimated Value' and 'Liable Person' are empty, and the reveal date is missing, further impacting consistency.

Sustainability aspects are moderately addressed. The tender explicitly emphasizes green procurement and is EU-funded, which often implies higher environmental standards. However, there is no explicit mention of social aspects or an innovation focus within the provided summaries.