Strateginis skaitmeninis partneris svetainei ir mobiliosioms programėlėms

This tender provides a clear description of the required services but is significantly hampered by the absence of evaluation criteria and a failed document download, raising concerns about legal compliance, clarity, and fairness.

The tender defines the procedure type and CPV codes correctly, and there are no disputes. However, the absence of specified evaluation criteria, missing explicit mandatory exclusion grounds, and a missing reveal date are significant legal compliance deficiencies.

The description of the existing platform and the scope of work, including technical requirements, is very clear and unambiguous. However, the complete lack of evaluation criteria severely diminishes the overall clarity for potential bidders on how their proposals will be assessed.

Basic information, financial details, and duration are provided. However, the critical 'Tender Notice' document failed to download, and evaluation criteria are entirely missing. There are also missing codes for the procedure type and liable person.

The lack of specified evaluation criteria is a major fairness concern, as bidders cannot understand the basis of selection. The failed download of a key document also impedes equal access to information. While technical requirements are specific, they appear justified by the existing platform.

The tender states 'E-Procurement' but this is contradicted by an automated check, creating ambiguity. The failed download of a tender document is a significant practical barrier. The contract start date is not specified, though duration is clear.

Most key fields are populated, and dates are logical. However, there are missing codes for the procedure type, a missing liable person, and a missing reveal date. The contradiction regarding e-procurement is also a data inconsistency.

The tender mentions 'community benefit expectations' and the capability for 'innovation' as part of the long-term vision, indicating some consideration for social and innovation aspects. However, these are not explicitly detailed as evaluation criteria, nor is there a focus on green procurement.