Patalpų išorinės sienos vertikalios ir horizontalios izoliacijos atkarpos renovacija Jaworzna mokyklos-darželio komplekse Nr. 2, Chropaczowkos g. 101

This tender for renovation works exhibits significant deficiencies in legal compliance, clarity, and fairness due to missing critical information such as the procedure type, estimated value, and evaluation criteria. While basic information and documents are present, these omissions create substantial risks for transparency and fair competition.

The tender lacks a clearly defined procurement procedure type, which is a fundamental legal requirement. The estimated value is not disclosed, and the reveal date is missing. While CPV codes are correctly assigned and no disputes are present, these omissions significantly undermine legal compliance.

The description of the works is clear and detailed. However, the critical absence of specified evaluation criteria makes it impossible for bidders to understand how their offers will be judged, severely impacting the clarity of the procurement process. The AI's inability to process .odt files also limits full clarity assessment from the summary.

Basic information like title, reference, organization, and location are present. Deadlines and duration are specified. However, the tender is incomplete due to the missing estimated value, the absence of evaluation criteria, and the 'Liable Person' field being unpopulated. While documents are attached, the lack of key data points is a significant drawback.

The tender supports e-procurement and provides access to documents, which are positive for fairness. However, the lack of specified evaluation criteria is a major impediment to objective and transparent assessment, making the process inherently unfair. The non-disclosure of the estimated value also hinders fair competition.

Electronic submission is supported, which enhances practicality for bidders. The contract duration is clearly specified. However, the absence of a contract start date and the non-disclosure of financing information (estimated value) reduce the practicality for bidders in planning and resource allocation.

Several key fields are unpopulated, including the procurement procedure type, estimated value, and liable person. The reveal date is also missing. While other dates are logical and there are no disputes, these significant gaps indicate poor data consistency.

The tender does not include any specific requirements or considerations related to green procurement, social aspects, or innovation. It is also not indicated as EU-funded, which often correlates with higher sustainability standards.