PS/25/67 - Eismo tyrimų pagrindų sutartis

This tender is generally well-structured with clear basic information and a defined scope. However, it lacks specific details on evaluation criteria and financial value, impacting completeness and potentially fairness.

The tender adheres to open procedure and specifies a CPV code. Deadlines are provided, though the submission deadline might be considered short given the scope. No disputes are reported. Regulatory compliance is assumed but not explicitly detailed.

The description of the required services (Traffic Surveys) is clear. The framework agreement structure is understandable. However, the absence of specified evaluation criteria makes it difficult for bidders to fully understand how their submissions will be assessed.

Basic information such as title, reference, organization, and deadline is present. The contract duration is specified. However, the estimated value is not disclosed, and the content of the tender documents is not available for review, leaving a significant gap in completeness.

The tender is an open procedure, promoting broad participation. The value is classified, which can sometimes obscure transparency. The lack of disclosed evaluation criteria could lead to perceived bias. E-procurement is indicated, which is a positive for fairness.

E-procurement is mentioned, which is positive. However, the lack of explicit mention of e-submission as the sole method and the absence of a contract start date reduce practicality. Financing information is not detailed.

Key fields like title, reference, organization, and deadline are populated. The status is 'active', and no disputes are reported. Dates appear logical within the context of a tender. The absence of a reveal date is a minor inconsistency.

There is no explicit mention of green procurement, social aspects, or innovation within the provided tender information. This suggests a lack of focus on these areas.