Venue Cymru – Sąnaudų konsultantas

This tender for a Cost Consultant at Venue Cymru is generally well-structured, with clear basic information and a reasonable estimated value. However, it lacks specific evaluation criteria and details on e-submission, impacting its overall practicality and fairness.

The tender adheres to general legal compliance by providing a clear procedure (open procedure), a proper CPV code, and no reported disputes. The deadlines appear reasonable within the context of the project timeline. The absence of specific regulatory compliance details prevents a higher score.

The description of the project and the role of the Cost Consultant is clear. The requirements for experience are specified, although detailed evaluation criteria are missing. The conditions for submission are generally understood.

Most basic information is present, including the estimated value, contract duration, and start date. However, the lack of content in the tender documents and the absence of specified evaluation criteria reduce its completeness.

The tender is open, and the estimated value is disclosed, promoting fairness. The criteria for eligibility (experienced Cost Consultant) and technical capability are objective. However, the lack of specified evaluation criteria and the absence of e-submission details could be perceived as less fair.

The tender specifies a contract start date and duration. However, the lack of information regarding e-submission and the absence of document content make the practical execution of the submission process less straightforward.

Key fields such as title, reference, organization, value, and dates are populated consistently. There are no reported suspensions or disputes, and the dates provided are logically sequenced.

The tender does not explicitly mention any green procurement, social aspects, innovation, or EU funding, which limits its sustainability score. This is an area for potential improvement.