Prisijunkite, kad galėtumėte naudoti laimėjimo strategijos rekomendacijas.
PrisijungtiAtnaujinkite, kad matytumėte, kurios įmonės greičiausiai pateiks pasiūlymą šiam konkursui, remiantis istoriniais viešųjų pirkimų duomenimis.
Prisijungti7 reikalavimų 5 kategorijose
Prisiregistruokite, kad peržiūrėtumėte visus reikalavimus ir analizę
Šiam konkursui nėra apdorotų dokumentų.
Dokumentai čia pasirodys, kai tik jie bus atsisiųsti ir išanalizuoti.
This is a preliminary market engagement notice for a stadium feasibility study. While offering good access via an e-procurement portal and clear objectives, it lacks detailed technical and financial requirements and does not address sustainability aspects.
The notice generally adheres to legal requirements for pre-tender engagement, providing a clear reference and CPV code. Deadlines are stated, and the process is conducted via a recognized e-procurement platform. The absence of a 'reveal date' is a minor point for this stage.
The description of the purpose for the feasibility study is clear, focusing on determining the future role and function of the stadium. However, specific technical capability requirements are vague, essentially asking for market interest rather than detailed criteria.
Basic information like title, organization, reference, and a deadline are present. The contract duration and start date are specified. However, the estimated value is undisclosed, and there are no attached documents with content, hindering a full assessment of requirements.
The process is conducted via a public e-procurement portal ('The Chest'), ensuring broad access. The objective is to gauge market interest, which is a fair approach for a PME. The lack of specific, potentially restrictive, technical criteria enhances fairness at this stage.
The use of an e-submission platform ('The Chest') is practical. Financing information is not detailed, which is common for a PME. The contract start date and duration are provided, offering clarity on the intended timeline post-procurement.
Key fields such as title, reference, organization, deadline, CPV, and contract dates are consistently populated and logical. No disputes or suspensions are indicated, contributing to high data consistency.
There is no mention of green procurement, social aspects, innovation, or EU funding, indicating a complete lack of focus on these areas. This significantly impacts the sustainability score.
Prisiregistruokite, kad peržiūrėtumėte visus reikalavimus ir analizę
Nereikia kreditinės kortelės • Sąranka per 2 minutes
Sveiki! Aš esu jūsų AI asistentas, skirtas šiam konkursui. Galiu padėti jums suprasti reikalavimus, terminus, tinkamumo kriterijus ir pateikti strateginių įžvalgų.
Nereikia kreditinės kortelės