Retour aux appels d'offres

Modélisation du bruit des éoliennes

Ouvert
Date limite
15 jours restants
Mars 17, 2026
Détails du contrat
Catégorie
Services
Référence
306876
Valeur
€40,000
Lieu
Estonia, Estonie
Publié
Mars 02, 2026
Organisation
Code CPV
Critères d'évaluation
Total bid cost (euros, excluding VAT)100%
Calendrier du projet

Publication de l'appel d'offres

Mars 02, 2026

Date limite pour les questions

Mars 10, 2026

Date limite de soumission

Mars 17, 2026

Ouverture de l'appel d'offres

Mars 17, 2026

Probabilité de gainPRO
🔒
Passer au Professionnel
Consultez votre probabilité de gain estimée basée sur les données historiques.
Passer au Professionnel →
Intelligence acheteurPRO
🔒
Débloquer l'intelligence acheteur
Consultez les modèles de dépenses, les procédures préférées et plus encore.
Passer au Professionnel →
Aperçu du secteurPRO
🔒
Débloquer les aperçus du secteur
Consultez les prix gagnants moyens, les niveaux de concurrence et les tendances du marché.
Passer au Professionnel →
Budget
€40,000
Durée
2 mois
Lieu
Estonia
Type
Services
75
Score de qualité/100
Bon
Référentiel de marché
Prix moyen gagnant
€71,415
Offres moyennes
4.8
Concurrence
Moyenne
PME gagnantes
99%
2,006 appels d'offres analysés

Description originale de l'appel d'offres

L'objectif de la présente procédure d'appel d'offres est de conclure un contrat d'approvisionnement pour la modélisation du bruit des éoliennes conformément aux conditions énoncées dans les documents d'appel d'offres (y compris l'annexe 1).
Soumission électronique

Analyse des risques

Veuillez vous connecter pour utiliser l'analyse des risques.

Se connecter

Stratégie gagnante

Connectez-vous pour accéder aux recommandations de stratégie gagnante.

Se connecter

Concurrents

Passez à un plan supérieur pour voir quelles entreprises sont susceptibles de soumissionner pour cet appel d'offres, basé sur les données historiques.

Se connecter

Exigences et qualifications

18 exigences dans 5 catégories

Soumission (7)
Obligatoire (1)
Conformité (3)
Technique (4)
Financier (3)
SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS7
--Bids must be submitted electronically via eRHR.
--The deadline for bid submission is 2026-03-17 14:00:00.
--Bidders have the right to offer equivalent products, even if a specific source, brand, patent, type, origin, or production method is mentioned, as per RHS § 88 lg 3, 6, and 7.
MANDATORY EXCLUSION GROUNDS1
--Bidders must not be under sanctions.
ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS3
--Bidders must confirm they meet the tender conditions.
--Bidders must be aware of all tender document requirements.
--Bidders must submit a confirmation (ESPD) as initial evidence instead of certificates from authorities or third parties.
TECHNICAL CAPABILITY REQUIREMENTS4
--Bidders must provide a technical description of wind turbine noise modeling.
--The technical description must include details of the software and methods used.
--The technical description must comply with provided standards and scenarios.
FINANCIAL REQUIREMENTS3
--The total value of the tender is 40000.0 EUR.
--The duration of the contract is 2 months.
--Bids will be evaluated primarily based on the total cost of the bid, with the lowest price receiving the maximum score.

Aperçu des exigences

Inscrivez-vous pour consulter les exigences et l'analyse complètes

Documents

9 documents disponibles avec des résumés IA

VastavustingimusedPDF
306876_vastavustingimused.pdf -- 7.1 KB

The bidder must submit confirmations of compliance with tender procedures, absence of sanctions, and awareness of all tender document requirements.

Hindamiskriteeriumid ja hinnatavad näitajadPDF
306876_hindamiskriteeriumid.pdf -- 3.3 KB

The contracting authority, University of Tartu, will evaluate bids for wind turbine noise modeling primarily based on the total bid price, where the lowest price receives the maximum score.

Hankepass täiendatavate selgitustegaPDF
306876_hankepass_taiendavate_selgitustega.pdf -- 70.6 KB

The Procurement Pass, or European Single Procurement Document (ESPD), is a bidder's self-declaration serving as preliminary evidence instead of certificates issued by authorities or third parties, and includes conditions set by the contracting authority.

Juhised hankemenetluses osalemiseksPDF
Juhised hankemenetluses osalemiseks.pdf -- 127.1 KB

This document provides instructions for participating in the procurement procedure, clarifying the base documents, communication, and submission process for bids.

Lisa 1 Tehniline kirjeldusPDF
Lisa 1 Tehniline kirjeldus.pdf -- 138.8 KB

Bidders must submit a technical description for modeling wind turbine noise, including details of the software and methods used, according to the provided standards and scenarios.

Lisa 2 Pakkuja esindaja volikiri (vorm)DOC
Lisa 2 Pakkuja esindaja volikiri (vorm).docx -- 28.9 KB

This document is a power of attorney authorizing a bidder's representative to submit a bid for Tartu University's public procurement tender "Modeling of noise from wind turbines".

Lisa 3 Ühispakkujate volikiri ja kinnitus (vorm)DOC
Lisa 3 Ühispakkujate volikiri ja kinnitus (vo... -- 29.3 KB

This document is a joint bidder authorization and confirmation, empowering one joint bidder to represent others in submitting a bid and fulfilling the contract, confirming joint and several liability.

Lisa 4 Hankelepingu kavandPDF
Lisa 4 Hankelepingu kavand.pdf -- 212.0 KB

This document is a draft contract outlining the terms, objective, deadline, cost, and obligations of the parties for the wind turbine noise modeling service.

Pakkumuse esitamise ettepanekPDF
Pakkumuse esitamise ettepanek - nõuded pakkuj... -- 151.4 KB

The University of Tartu invites bidders to participate in an open tender procedure for modeling wind turbine noise, with proposals to be submitted electronically via eRHR by March 17, 2026, at 2:00 PM.

Aperçu des documents

Inscrivez-vous pour consulter les résumés et l'analyse des documents

75
Bon

Score de qualité de l'appel d'offres

This tender for wind turbine noise modeling is generally well-structured with clear requirements and a straightforward evaluation process. However, it lacks explicit sustainability considerations and has some minor practical limitations regarding document access.

Répartition du score

Conformité légale75/100

The tender appears to comply with general legal requirements for public procurement. Deadlines are specified and seem reasonable for the scope. The CPV code is provided, and there is no indication of existing disputes or regulatory non-compliance. The procedure type (Open Procedure) is standard.

Clarté80/100

The tender provides a clear title and description of the service required. The AI-extracted requirements further detail the technical and submission stipulations. The evaluation criteria are mentioned as 'relative_weighting', suggesting a structured approach, though specifics of non-price criteria are not detailed beyond the primary cost focus.

Exhaustivité70/100

Most essential information is present, including estimated value, contract duration, and reveal/opening dates. Key documents like the technical specification, draft contract, and required authorization forms are attached or referenced. However, the specific details for 'relative_weighting' evaluation beyond price are not fully elaborated in the provided AI-extracted text.

Specific details on non-price evaluation criteria under 'relative_weighting' could be clearer.
Équité85/100

The tender is an open procedure, and bidders are allowed to offer equivalent products, which promotes fairness. The evaluation is primarily based on price, which is transparent. The use of ESPD as preliminary evidence is a standard fair practice. Access to documents is provided via URLs and attachments.

Aspect pratique65/100

The tender mandates electronic submission, which is practical. However, one of the ESPD documents is in an XML format not supported for AI analysis, which might pose a minor hurdle for some bidders' automated processing. The contract start date is not explicitly stated, only the duration.

One ESPD document format (.xml) is not machine-readable for AI analysis, potentially creating a minor accessibility issue.
Contract start date is not explicitly mentioned, only duration.
Cohérence des données90/100

Key fields such as title, reference, organization, value, and deadlines are consistently populated. There are no indications of suspension or disputes. The dates provided (Reveal, Submission Deadline, Opening) are logical in sequence.

Durabilité50/100

The tender does not explicitly mention any green procurement criteria, social aspects, or innovation focus. While EU funding is not explicitly stated, it is common for public tenders. The lack of specific sustainability clauses limits this score.

No explicit mention of green procurement criteria.
No explicit mention of social aspects or innovation.

Points forts

Clear description of the service and objective.
Open procedure with allowance for equivalent products.
Electronic submission and e-procurement.
All required authorization forms are provided.

Préoccupations

Lack of explicit sustainability considerations (green, social, innovation).
Ambiguity in non-price evaluation criteria beyond cost.
One ESPD document format is not AI-readable.

Recommandations

1. Incorporate specific green procurement or social responsibility clauses if applicable.
2. Clarify the detailed weighting of non-price evaluation criteria.
3. Ensure all provided document formats are easily accessible and parsable.

Aperçu de la notation IA

Inscrivez-vous pour consulter les exigences et l'analyse complètes

Analyse complète du score de qualité
Répartition détaillée des sous-scores
Aperçu des forces et des préoccupations
Recommandations stratégiques

Aucune carte de crédit requise • Configuration en 2 minutes

Ajouter au Pipeline